Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

if you have the V4 mode tuned out, then remove the flapper. If you do not, leave flapper.

 

 

Bam. Lock the thread haha.

 

My friend owns a muffler shop so I tried 4 different configurations and this is 10000% accurate.

 

 

Will the Magnaflow 12909 fit with the flapper in place?

Posted

I just went through the muffler delete process. For me it sounded good/deep but it was loud with flapper clamped open and any accleration. On idle it had a good clean rumble. The unclamped flapper made a strange flutter sound so I had to remove. It was loud enough my wife and neighbors could hear me come from slightly down the street and on highway you definitely had more cabin rumble noise even without v4. So I removed flapper and resonator also and added back in a Magnaflow 12909 22" muffler. This seems to be more my style. Nice low growl, calm in the neighborhood, but nice when you lay into it, I barely have any v4 chopper noise with this setup. Everyone on this forum has a different level of what is acceptable sound and for some it will never be loud enough. To note as well I have an AFE CAI on the truck and feel it does add to the sound as well. Keep that in mind if you plan to upgrade your intake as well. Good luck on finding your sound.

 

Sent from my Note 5 using Tapatalk

 

Very well stated. :thumbs:

 

I've had people say, "This is too dang loud! How can you stand it?!"

 

And Others say, "I thought you were going to put exhaust on this thing, I can't even hear it!"

 

:lol:

  • Like 1
  • 2 years later...
Posted

I still own a 2000 Mustang GT with a Kenne Bell Twin Screw 2.1 kit and recently replaced the Flowmasters  with some quieter mufflers because it was just too loud. They were the first mod I did to the car back in 2000 and now I'm a little older and wanted to hear the radio.  I do remember Ford made mufflers for the old FR500 Mustang M-5230-M58 that were  quiet until you open it up and a flapper inside the muffler would activate.  I would definitely consider something like that for my 19 Silverado. Nice and subdued until you get a little rowdy.

Posted

Just came across this

On 1/1/2020 at 9:17 AM, Weaverstreet said:

I still own a 2000 Mustang GT with a Kenne Bell Twin Screw 2.1 kit and recently replaced the Flowmasters  with some quieter mufflers because it was just too loud. They were the first mod I did to the car back in 2000 and now I'm a little older and wanted to hear the radio.  I do remember Ford made mufflers for the old FR500 Mustang M-5230-M58 that were  quiet until you open it up and a flapper inside the muffler would activate.  I would definitely consider something like that for my 19 Silverado. Nice and subdued until you get a little rowdy.

 

Posted (edited)
On 1/30/2017 at 5:34 PM, tjd2003 said:

Interior sound is mild. It sounds about the same as the stock exhaust on my wife's 07 Yukon Denali with the 6.2. For some reason GM decided these newer vehicles needed to be quiet. I felt like I needed to undo that haha. Under normal driving its barely louder than stock inside. Under acceleration you can definitely hear it. I installed the Range AFM module to turn the V4 mode off. When it switched to V4 it sounded terrible, but I removed the flapper with mine as well.

LOL ....As said earlier, EVERYONE has their own thoughts on what's loud.  I just did the muffler and flapper valve delete and left the resonator, earlier this week, and as a side note, my V4  is turned off. 

My thoughts are that at start up, it sound awesome !  In drive  but idling, it sounds great.  Accelerating, it sounds freakin fantastic.  But .... just running down the road at minimum throttle, it has an annoying drone inside the truck.  Mine has the 3.42 gears IIRC, and with a light load, I just don't like how it sounds or feels.  My own opinion is that it may have lost a bit of low end torque by opening up the exhaust, and it almost sounds like its bogging down until it gets up past about 1300/1500 rpm.  I haven't run it long enough yet to be sure, but  I also may have lost about 1 MPG from what I'm seeing so far.  I've had a hand held tuner but have not loaded any tune on it yet, just turned off the V4 and corrected for the tire size.  I plan to load one of the tunes soon, but wanted to get a good feel for it currently, and to better see what the MPG's are doing.  If nothing else, I may put a shorty  (maybe 14-18 inch) straight thru glass-pack or  Magnaflow on it to bring the drone down to where I like it.

Edited by T-Town-Z
  • Thanks 1
  • 3 months later...
Posted

I tried the flapper clamped open and I feel that the throttle was a little dead off the line like that so I unclamped it and the response returned. I'll wait for a programmer especially one that lets you adjust the rev limiter/ shift points. The truck shifts way too soon. My 07 with a 4.8 and 35 inch tires was shifting north of 6k and it really woke up above 5000 rpm.

  • 7 months later...
Posted

Does this void any warranties doing this? I have a 2020TrailBoss and have been thinking about doing it. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,737
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Christopher Miller
    Newest Member
    Christopher Miller
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,354 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Without knowing how bad your banging is, one suggestion is the intermediate steering shaft on the steering wheel. These used to be a problem on 800 and earlier series. The feeling/sound was sometimes described as "clunking" and was felt in the wheel. Also there is a plastic piece in the lower column that is referred to as a bearing. Not your traditional looking bearing though. Your ball joints, bushings and tie rods or steering rack (if equipped) are the main point of issues. You never mention total unit miles, only that you've put 60k on it.   You can search the site for help on the ISS description. Plenty of these have been replaced   https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=site%3Agm-trucks.com+intermediate+steering+shaft&ia=web
    • Yes I have is set with the 1mm disk (Minumim Tension), for spring spacing and I raised my truck in the rear 1.5". You can go 2mm  and I think 3mm if you need.Minimum. We are on our way to TN from GA.. My wife is driving and stated she cannot believe  and   stated she can not belive the difference.
    • Most 1 ton trucks come with the factory overload spring, which need to be removed for installation of RoadActive Suspension. Removing the overload allows proper fitment and ensures the system works as intended. The RAS® Mega-Duty kit will reduce squat and provide significant improvement vs the factory overload spring.
    • I wonder as well, why they would send me a text message with links to these suggested procedures totalling over $10,000 without even the slightest hint of how they arrived at these being necessary.
    • https://precisionlubrication.com/articles/oil-filter-efficiency/     For them it is a problem of $$$$ and compliance. To cover both they have to lie from the heart.    Government wants low waste oil numbers so the bar needs to be very low on contamination to met that requirement.  Consumer wants cheap maintenance (perceived cost). Again requiring a low bar.  OEM wants high margins at a cost effective warranty rate and lots of repeat customers. More low bar.  Filter manufacture wants the same thing the OEM wants. See the pattern?   Consumers are fickle and also want perfection requiring a HIGH bar. Inconsistent with all of the above. Consumers can be, when the put their minds to it, inquisitive, love winning arguments which requires some useful information to be available to support them. And this is where it gets sticky and the lies begin.    Information needs a solid well grounded point of reference if we are to compare in a useful way. There is a standard for this.  ISO 4548-12. This standard sets the particle size at a specific Beta ratio and darn few are faithful to its intent.    If they don't state the test method they change the particle size or the Beta ratio to hit a perceived favorable standard. They obscure the information in a way as to prevent direct comparisons leaving the consumer with one method. UOA's with an ISO 4406 test result. Pricey and not allot of labs willing to do the work. Lobby work happens everywhere, not just at the seat of government.       
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...