Jump to content

2015 Silverado LT wouldnt start and has CEL after jump


cubangt

Recommended Posts

Posted

So i have a 2015 Silverado LT Crew Cab, yesterday truck worked and drove fine.. up until the late afternoon when we got in the truck and turned it on, it was weird.. the radio was on, but adjusting the volumn up or down, still couldnt hear the sound. Then i noticed that the clicking from the turn signal couldnt be heard either.. that was weird.. got home, parked, turn off and on the truck, still same results, but truck started fine.. no struggle or indiciation of potential issues..

 

Come out this morning and wouldnt turn on, barely clicked when turning the key, when i attempted to start and leave the key in the on position, there are 2 messages on the dash..

"Service - Theft Deterrent System"

"Service - Engine Power is reduced"

 

when i checked with the scan tool i got back 2 faults,, both showed up as

N/A - 01/02

N/A - 02/02

 

I was able to jump start the truck, but the 2 messaged still appeared and the CEL was on as well as the little lock icon. While idle in the driveway you could tell that it wasnt running at full power, if that makes sense, it was NOT idling rough, but was lacking power.. battery showed 14+ on the needle, but if i turned it off and on, wouldnt start back up unless i jumped it again..

 

I did not want to attempt to drive it to the dealership in this condition

 

I am taking it to the dealership after work today, but wanted to get idea of what it could possibly be?

Only mods i have on the truck are the throttle control harness and a Offroad LED bar

I have since pulled the fuse for the LED bar and the throttle control is still connected..

 

I may remove before taking to dealership so they cant refuse service, but could i have done anything to cause this? or just something else.

 

only have 24k miles, so better still be under warranty, just looking for idea of what it could be..

Posted

bad battery already? bought it new 2 years ago and only has about 24k miles..

 

If it is the battery, could my LED bar have cause issues, i mean i havent used the light since i installed it, and the fuse is pulled for it.. It is connected directly to the battery posts, if that matters. but not used or turned on.

 

I just noticed i forgot to post in the original post above, that we did receive a onstar email that says it detected a critical issue with the engine and transmission system.

Posted

I can do that when i get home, but wouldnt that just tell me how many volts it has currently since i cant start it without jumping the truck?

By the time i get home i have about 2hrs before the dealership service center closes.. so id like to check and make sure of things before i take it and have an idea of what to expect from them. I dont want to give them any reason to say its my fault if its not..

Posted

Fully charged battery = 12.5 volts. :happysad:

Posted

thanks, i check once i get home.. if i check it before jump starting and reads less than 12.5v, that isnt 100% battery issue right.. i mean it could just be lower because of the few attempts to start it this morning..

Posted

Remove battery or drive to auto store for free battery test. :happysad:

Posted

So, if its the battery, what brand should i consider.. i was looking at the 3 auto parts locations near me and only 2 of the 3 sites are working, but none seems to carry the optima battery..

If im going to have to spend $219 for a new battery, rather go ahead and get a better than factory battery..

 

Suggestions...

Local parts locations are

Oreillys

Autozone

Advanced Auto Parts

NAPA

Posted

So wife logged into our chevy online account and found that the error reported this morning by the truck was the following:

There is sensor reference voltage volt malfunction. An engine monitoring sensor is reading incorrectly.

Posted

Just wanted to provide an update after yesterdays ordeal..

Got home, jumped the truck and let it idle for as long as i was outside.. checked the battery with volt meter.. read about 14.xx volts.. which is about what it reads inside on the dash.

After a amount of time, wasnt aware i needed to time, but heard a ding and saw on the dash the following message..

Action Required Battery Low Start Vehicle.

I tried and couldnt, so just turned it off..

 

Was able to finally pull a legit code off and it was

P0697 Sensor Reference Voltage C Circuit Open

 

So by this time, i called the chevy roadside number and had them pick it up and tow to the dealership yesterday, waiting to hear back from them today on what they found.

 

When i drove by this morning, i saw it in the service lane with the hood up, so im sure they were trying to get it started..

Posted

Well, dealership called and stated it was the Battery, they called my wife instead of me, but ill try to get more from them on the CEL code that was reported..

 

Could a P0697 Sensor Reference Voltage C Circuit Open error be as simple as a bad battery?

Posted

Autozone and Oriellys carries Optima batteries. In my wifes truck we put a Duralst AGM and seems to be doing fine in the Texas heat. It has 3 year warranty and easy to find an autozone if we have a problem. I got batteries from Batteries Plus. The X2 brand which is made by North Star. Batteries Plus offers a 5 year replacement warranty on my main battery and a 4 year on my auxiliary battery because its a marine dual purpose. Odyssey batteries are also very good.

 

 

Could have had both of ours replaced under warranty but didnt want to take a chance on delco batteries, they 1seem to be a gamble on how long they last.

Posted

So far this hasnt cost me a dime, all covered under warranty, so ill let it ride until i need another one..

For the cost of the new battery though i was looking at the Optima and Bosch one and was ready to buy one and not even bother with the dealership

 

Finally spoke to the service dept and alternator and electrical system passed all test, battery failed load test, replaced battery and reset codes and said should be ready to go..

 

We will see how that goes..

 

Now to finish my LED light bars install and not cause any issues..

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 472 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...