Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, riverbanks said:

Yep,stinks,no pun intended,you went by the book for repair,and still a issue,but,you verified power at solenoid,and followed the ecm ground for a problem?so close,man

Didn't follow the ecm ground but I had power to the solenoid 

Posted

There are two sides to this issue isn't there? You have throw all the mechanical parts at it, it would seem to me that you may be overlooking something in the electrical side. 

This is going to sound stupid, but, when they test do they actually connect a scan tool, or do they simply use a sniffer and look for a light on the dash? Reason I ask is that about 15nyears ago I installed a centrifugal supercharger on a 2000 ML320 Mercedes.  This kit was from Mosselman, and would set a check engine light if you ran under boost too long for the evap syztem.  At the time we had emission testing on rollers.  There was an at idle test and then a simulated.ighway test.  I knew it would fail the highway portion.  When it came time to test it, it passed with flying colours.  Seems AWD vehicles had the idle test, and a test at 2000 rpm in park. The inspection stations only had one set of rollers. And since it couldn't use the rollers, no ECM connection, just an inspection to see if the CEL light was on during the test.  I had pulled the bulb out as a "Hail Mary", ,just in case, effort and it paid off.  They didn't even bring it into the shop.  They backed the truck up to the shop door, ran the sniffer out the door into the exhaust, and used the tach in the dash to do the highway test. It passed the sniffer test easily, he only needed to rest his foot on the gas pedal to get to 2000 rpm.  After I got the truck back to my buddies place I stuck the bulb back in and found it had set the CEL on the way to the shop.  Merging into traffic on the 401 set the light. I finally resolved the CEL issue by putting two big vacuum cans on it.  That truck missed the grandfather limit by a year.  Then the government just killed the entire program last year, saying it served its purpose and got the worst cars off the road. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Doug_Scott said:

There are two sides to this issue isn't there? You have throw all the mechanical parts at it, it would seem to me that you may be overlooking something in the electrical side. 

This is going to sound stupid, but, when they test do they actually connect a scan tool, or do they simply use a sniffer and look for a light on the dash? Reason I ask is that about 15nyears ago I installed a centrifugal supercharger on a 2000 ML320 Mercedes.  This kit was from Mosselman, and would set a check engine light if you ran under boost too long for the evap syztem.  At the time we had emission testing on rollers.  There was an at idle test and then a simulated.ighway test.  I knew it would fail the highway portion.  When it came time to test it, it passed with flying colours.  Seems AWD vehicles had the idle test, and a test at 2000 rpm in park. The inspection stations only had one set of rollers. And since it couldn't use the rollers, no ECM connection, just an inspection to see if the CEL light was on during the test.  I had pulled the bulb out as a "Hail Mary", ,just in case, effort and it paid off.  They didn't even bring it into the shop.  They backed the truck up to the shop door, ran the sniffer out the door into the exhaust, and used the tach in the dash to do the highway test. It passed the sniffer test easily, he only needed to rest his foot on the gas pedal to get to 2000 rpm.  After I got the truck back to my buddies place I stuck the bulb back in and found it had set the CEL on the way to the shop.  Merging into traffic on the 401 set the light. I finally resolved the CEL issue by putting two big vacuum cans on it.  That truck missed the grandfather limit by a year.  Then the government just killed the entire program last year, saying it served its purpose and got the worst cars off the road. 

Since it's obd1, they can't connect a scantool. They use the sniffer and visually inspect it. If I shut the truck off before I take it to the e check, the engine light will turn off. However, when the test actually happens, the sniffer reads high nox. Then back at home, I can check for codes and it shows a code 32. 

Posted

Still researching,so if command is sent,it could possibly be cut off by perameters not staying steady,1,steady throttle with less than 2% change?,so back to vacuum guage, check for steady needle

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Code 32 is a egr solenoid code. Torque converter clutch is also on that circuit. It is on the same driver from the ecm, if your tcc solenoid is shorting out it will prevent your egr solenoid from working. 

  • 3 years later...
Posted
On 1/7/2019 at 6:54 PM, Joeyblaze said:

I have a 1995 GMC k1500 4x4 with the 5.7L TBI engine in it. I just bought the truck and as it is about 24 years old, it only needs to pass one more emisions test before It is grandfathered and therefore immune to e-checks (I live in northern Ohio) and also before I can get plates for it. The problem is, I've failed e check 3 times. A code 32 pops up every time I test it (on my own with a reader) and when I got the emissions test, high nox is the reason it fails. This would make sense, as code 32 is an egr error, and the egr being faulty would definitely trigger high nox, however:

The egr valve has been replaced (yes, a negative one) 

The egr vacuum solenoid has been replaced 

Map sensor replaced 

Spark plugs, cap, rotor, wires. Replaced

Even went as far as to replace the oxygen sensor.  

There doesn't seem to be any vacuum leaks and every test I've done on any part of the egr system points to it all running correctly. 

 

The kicker is: the truck runs great! No loss in power. Idles great. Super clean and well kept truck. 

 

Notes : it does have a Flowmaster super 10 dual exhaust on it, but it isn't a true dual as only one pipe comes from the catalytic into the exhaust, Then two come out. 

 

Also, high nox seems to be caused by high engine Temps, however, my engine temp on my dash shows that it never gets above about 165 or 170*. Idk if this is relevant but it seemed strange. 

 

Any help is greatly appreciated. I'm really at a loss and I'm running out of time before I need to buy another temporary tag. 

Thanks again - Joe 

I know this post is old and this is a Hail Mary shot but I just bought a Chevy version of your truck and it’s throwing the same 32 code. I was wondering if you resolved your issues or what happen? Thanks Dan

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No engine digit "E" for 2019-2026.  Stop reading slop online     All 2026 V8s have functioning DFM.  Hardware and software.  5.3 and 6.2.  The L84 5.3 has "D" as the 8th digit of the VIN, the L87 6.2 has "L" as the 8th digit of the VIN.       If you want a factory DFM disabled 2019-2026, you'd have to find a used 2021 or 2022 chip shortage truck.  The vehicle build data will have a specific RPO code indicating its a factory disabled truck.  RPO code YK9 and only with the L84 5.3 engine.  These still have the hardware installed but are NOT functioning due to the COVID chip shortages that were ongoing.  
    • My post above is the direct reason for my outsized interest in keeping what I have for as long as possible. My memory isn't as short as some. 
    • I don't think so. 😏 Cars? Our experience will diverge there as well. I was buying cars with 200K (1970's) when I started and quite a few were pretty solid cars. (My early stuff was 1964 to 1968)  Some stinkers but not the dismal picture painted above. Now that said, yes, a dealer wouldn't talk to you if your car had more than 60K on the clock and lot cars were 60K or less except the back row where 100-120K was the auction bought for dirt for us poor losers. Kids in my county were not allowed to wear long pants if they couldn't rebuild and repair every part of that beast.    I will agree that many parts are now better. Alternators and charging systems are an envy. But I replaced few water pumps or power steering pumps then. Rebuilt carburetors but replaced few. Mufflers are another place of OEM improvement. Stainless? We didn't have no stink'n stainless.    As long as humans are in charge of governance this $$$$ situation will not improve.    The purchasing power of a dollar in 1955 is significantly higher than in 2025, meaning that a dollar could buy more goods and services in 1955 compared to 2025 due to inflation over the years. For example, what you could buy for $1 in 1955 would require approximately $10.50 in 2025.  Calculator.net inflationtool.com   Comparison of Purchasing Power: 1955 vs 2025 The purchasing power of a dollar has changed significantly from 1955 to 2025 due to inflation. Below is a breakdown of how much more money is needed in 2025 to match the buying power of a dollar in 1955. Purchasing Power Overview Year Equivalent Value of $1 in 1955 1955 $1.00 2025 $10.50 Key Points Inflation Impact: The value of money decreases over time due to inflation, meaning that the same amount of money buys fewer goods and services in the future. Example of Inflation: What could be purchased for $1 in 1955 would require approximately $10.50 in 2025. This illustrates how inflation has eroded the purchasing power of the dollar over the decades. Understanding these changes in purchasing power is crucial for financial planning and assessing economic conditions over time.  Wikipedia Calculator.net
    • The thermometer has been in my wife's 2008 envoy, my sons 2016 chevy, my friends 2020 1500 silverado all showing cooler readings. It's not the guage.
    • Have a question concerning trim levels. Ive not bought a new vehicle since 2006, and I have decided on a 2500 gmc pro or silverado custom. For anyone that has one of these 2 trim levels have you regretted not stepping up to the LT or SLE. I look at things as the more electronics the more problems to arise. I love the look of the old school gauges on the dash as well. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...