Jump to content

Black exhaust deposits


Recommended Posts

Posted

2014 Silverado 5.3 80k. Wouldn’t start the other day when it was -30 F. It acted like it was flooded. Couldn’t mess with it for too long since the battery went dead(original battery). Got it going today with a jump from another truck and a lot of cranking since I think the plugs were fouled. It runs great now, but I saw all these deposits in the snow? Is it just carbon deposits, and do you think that could have been partially what was keeping it from starting? Maybe plugged injectors?

A0CF2164-AD08-45C5-A2B7-99F044FCCC6E.jpeg

Posted

It was probably the flapper valve frozen shut

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Posted

Good to know and yeah it was frozen shut. I tried to turn it with a big pliers, but I couldn’t get it to budge until the truck had warmed up. Same thing with a 2015 Sierra I compared it too. I thought maybe if it was froze shut that could have been what was keeping it from running, but once it was warmed up and able to move it stayed in the same spot as when it was frozen. So it’s default position must still allow adequate exhaust flow. I left that detail out since I think that rules that out for what was keeping it from starting, unless I’m wrong. 

Posted

After 4-5 years and 80k there will no doubt be carbon buildup just about everywhere.

Especially on the valves and in the exhaust system.

These DI engines spit out "normal" black soot on cold startup.

Could have been your flapper valve frozen. This is a common issue in sub zero temps.

Posted
Good to know and yeah it was frozen shut. I tried to turn it with a big pliers, but I couldn’t get it to budge until the truck had warmed up. Same thing with a 2015 Sierra I compared it too. I thought maybe if it was froze shut that could have been what was keeping it from running, but once it was warmed up and able to move it stayed in the same spot as when it was frozen. So it’s default position must still allow adequate exhaust flow. I left that detail out since I think that rules that out for what was keeping it from starting, unless I’m wrong. 

Yeah but if there was ice blocking the default passages in the closed flapper position the truck wouldn't have started. Water is a byproduct of combustion.

 

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Posted

Yeah I suppose that ice could have obstructed it. By the pictures of the flapper I can find online it looks like it wouldn’t take much. I’ll have to see if my scope can reach in there so I can see how it looks for the heck of it. Otherwise I see people put a clamp on it so it stays open all the time.

I’ll look into doing something for the carbon buildup like seafoam. I’ve always seen mixed reviews on seafoam for stuff in general, so I’ll do a little research first.

Posted
8 hours ago, snowboundrmk said:

Yeah I suppose that ice could have obstructed it. By the pictures of the flapper I can find online it looks like it wouldn’t take much. I’ll have to see if my scope can reach in there so I can see how it looks for the heck of it. Otherwise I see people put a clamp on it so it stays open all the time.

I’ll look into doing something for the carbon buildup like seafoam. I’ve always seen mixed reviews on seafoam for stuff in general, so I’ll do a little research first.

Hey, if you’re gonna dog out the scope, think you could take a look at your intake valves? Would love to see (if you have a way to capture a picture...some don’t) what your DI valves look like at 80K miles without a catch can...or for that matter if you do run one see how they look under that scenario.

Posted

I didn’t have any luck with the scope. I need to buy a better one one of theses days. It wouldn’t focus at all. I couldn’t get it past the resonator, and in the intake it was too blurry, but it did seem really crudy inside. The camera kept getting covered with crud. 

Posted
22 hours ago, snowboundrmk said:

I didn’t have any luck with the scope. I need to buy a better one one of theses days. It wouldn’t focus at all. I couldn’t get it past the resonator, and in the intake it was too blurry, but it did seem really crudy inside. The camera kept getting covered with crud. 

Well thank you for trying! Have a feeling with the crud you aren’t running a catch can?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Are we talking about the same thing, though? The 7 versus 3 wear metals was from Lakespeed's 3.0-specific oil brand comparison test between AcDelco oil and Mobil ESP. The filter remains a constant so whatever excess particles the AcDelco oil is producing aren't being filtered out.   I'm assuming there's a parallel comparison to be made; IF the filter can filter down those particles, engine life increases, and your graph makes the case that a better filter (lower micron rating) can increase engine life. Introducing fewer particles AND filtering those particles with higher efficiency is the best of all worlds. Good oil, good filter.   Where we may disagree is the "baseline relative engine life". I'm more apt to believe the base engine life value is 200k+ on very average oil and filters, "bulk oil of unknown brand and white-label generic fleet-grade filter, Jiffy Lube"   Going from a 10 micron filter to a 5 micron filter should boost a base 200k to 275k in a vacuum as a single factor alone.   Here's the whatabout: How does regularly changing the oil and filter ahead of recommended schedule influence baseline engine life? Most people aren't going to science the heck out of this stuff or ask about Micron ratings, HTHS, or wear comparison tests at Jiffy Lube. Most of the Jiffy lube techs would say they need to call their tech support line to even try to get an answer.   --   Because we love anecdotes here, when I was fishing for 4.3 parts at a local yard this weekend, ALL of the 4.3 vehicles had well over 200k. I love looking at odometers of junked vehicles. How far did THIS go before landing at the crusher? The ones that still had engines weren't seized. None of them were vehicles I'd consider were Amsoil queens, in fact most of them had some kind of service cling-sticker in the corner of the windshield indicating it probably had very average maintenance services. Even the fresh parts rigs- I'm not sure taking an S/T series to 400k has much value considering the running value of those vehicles was probably somewhere around $1,000. 25+ years is a good run on time alone.   The intake manifold I salvaged had clean and bright pool areas. As expected, I found the fuel lines in the manifold rubbed through, just like mine. I'm guessing the lines on that donor truck started leaking, the truck started running rough, and its owner said that's enough I'm unwilling or can't take it out of service for several days, or spend $1000+ to repair it at a shop, it's simply time for a newer more reliable vehicle (or, more than likely, this is the 2nd, 3rd time this has happened in the truck's lifetime). While I don't count on my Blazer for reliability, the thought of giving it away for parts at certain points during my adventure, and being mentally free from its needs has has crossed my mind. I'd be losing $1500 or so, but I can only make more money; not time.
    • still $4.00 85 oct.
    • Always here to help. Discount Code: TIFF5OFF
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...