Jump to content

Question for any AT4 owners that have the 1.5” leveling kit


Recommended Posts

Posted

If you have this kit on your AT4 do you have any issues?  Any issues during installation?  Someone said with the RC 2” leveling kit they needed 1/4” shorter bolts, just wondering if that would be the same with the Motofab kit.  

 

I would hate to get the front end a part then find out I have to go to the bolt store when this is my only vehicle at the moment lol. 

 

 

A53B4E14-B4B0-402A-A9A8-456B936A300A.jpeg

Posted
If you have this kit on your AT4 do you have any issues?  Any issues during installation?  Someone said with the RC 2” leveling kit they needed 1/4” shorter bolts, just wondering if that would be the same with the Motofab kit.  
 
I would hate to get the front end a part then find out I have to go to the bolt store when this is my only vehicle at the moment lol. 
 
 
A53B4E14-B4B0-402A-A9A8-456B936A300A.thumb.jpeg.e57fd0642257ef4cc09b839b1e1c8a32.jpeg
I had the 1.5"motofab kit and had no issues for 6k miles. I just installed the RC 4" lift which is why I removed the motofab. If you have not bought yours yet and are local to Orlando, I'll give it to you for $10e13c24ad768f24493318848d2910fe8a.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
13 minutes ago, destrada127 said:

I had the 1.5"motofab kit and had no issues for 6k miles. I just installed the RC 4" lift which is why I removed the motofab. If you have not bought yours yet and are local to Orlando, I'll give it to you for $10e13c24ad768f24493318848d2910fe8a.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
 

You had this on a AT4?  I already ordered it but thanks. 

Posted
I had the 1.5"motofab kit and had no issues for 6k miles. I just installed the RC 4" lift which is why I removed the motofab. If you have not bought yours yet and are local to Orlando, I'll give it to you for $10e13c24ad768f24493318848d2910fe8a.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk



If you want to sell it for that, I’ll take it and pay shipping.
Posted
You had this on a AT4?  I already ordered it but thanks. 
Yes I ordered that the day I picked up my truck. Here are some pics of my AT4 on 35s and the leveling kitd651658c236be4e0af02b45a70439a11.jpg5403f505c297db9e3c58be03c39e9f9a.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
Any issues with the 35’s rubbing? I have the 1 inch motofab on my at4
No issues on the 35s but that was on the stock wheels +32 offset

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Posted
Yes I ordered that the day I picked up my truck. Here are some pics of my AT4 on 35s and the leveling kitd651658c236be4e0af02b45a70439a11.jpg5403f505c297db9e3c58be03c39e9f9a.jpg

Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Any more photos of this set up on your truck? Which tires were you running?

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,202 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...