Jump to content

Intakes?


Recommended Posts

Posted
On 6/24/2019 at 11:06 AM, OnTheReel said:

Aftermarket seems a bit behind in general for the ‘19s. I’ve almost bought the GM Performance intake about 10 times now. Probably will eventually. Seems like the best option since it’s the only one that comes with a reflash to match. Paired with their exhaust it’s good for 15hp on the 6.2. Probably similar gains on the 5.3.

Am I reading this wrong? Typo? Does it really improve the 5.3L that much?

 

"Thanks to these additions, the AT4 Off-Road Package delivers 435 horsepower and 469 lb-ft of torque - increases of 15 horsepower and 9 lb-ft of torque over a Sierra equipped with a conventional 6.2L V8 engine, and 80 horsepower and 86 lb-ft of torque over Sierra AT4 models equipped with the standard 5.3L V8."

 

https://www.gmc.com/gmc-life/trucks/sierra-at4-off-road-performance-package

 

EDIT: Or is this suggesting the performance package includes a 6.2L ? heh.  Not something you get added to a 5.3L.  Wonder what just the package costs w/o the engine/transmission?

Posted
23 minutes ago, Maverick0984 said:

Am I reading this wrong? Typo? Does it really improve the 5.3L that much?

 

"Thanks to these additions, the AT4 Off-Road Package delivers 435 horsepower and 469 lb-ft of torque - increases of 15 horsepower and 9 lb-ft of torque over a Sierra equipped with a conventional 6.2L V8 engine, and 80 horsepower and 86 lb-ft of torque over Sierra AT4 models equipped with the standard 5.3L V8."

 

https://www.gmc.com/gmc-life/trucks/sierra-at4-off-road-performance-package

 

EDIT: Or is this suggesting the performance package includes a 6.2L ? heh.  Not something you get added to a 5.3L.  Wonder what just the package costs w/o the engine/transmission?

As far as I know that package isn’t it available anymore for 2020, but it was a “6.2 only” deal and the option price was sort of high as the 6.2 was rolled into it.

 

Nevertheless, the intake and exhaust were dealer installed on that truck, and can be added after the fact to any DFM 5.3 and 6.2. The exhaust is around $1250 online and figure another $100-200 install at the dealer. Intake is around $450.

 

The exhaust clearly makes up the majority of the power increase in the AT4 performance package, GM claims it alone will give a 13hp increase on the 6.2 (7hp on the 5.3). Simple math then leaves just a 2 hp increase attributed to the intake, and that hasn’t motivated me to get it yet.

Posted
39 minutes ago, Maverick0984 said:

Am I reading this wrong? Typo? Does it really improve the 5.3L that much?

 

"Thanks to these additions, the AT4 Off-Road Package delivers 435 horsepower and 469 lb-ft of torque - increases of 15 horsepower and 9 lb-ft of torque over a Sierra equipped with a conventional 6.2L V8 engine, and 80 horsepower and 86 lb-ft of torque over Sierra AT4 models equipped with the standard 5.3L V8."

 

https://www.gmc.com/gmc-life/trucks/sierra-at4-off-road-performance-package

 

EDIT: Or is this suggesting the performance package includes a 6.2L ? heh.  Not something you get added to a 5.3L.  Wonder what just the package costs w/o the engine/transmission?

Yeah, it was a typo. It should be 10 HP & 6 lb-ft torque for the 5.3 with duals.

 

Here's a different link.

https://www.chevrolet.com/performance/vehicle-upgrades/new-silverado/exhaust

Posted
5 minutes ago, OnTheReel said:

As far as I know that package isn’t it available anymore for 2020, but it was a “6.2 only” deal and the option price was sort of high as the 6.2 was rolled into it.

 

Nevertheless, the intake and exhaust were dealer installed on that truck, and can be added after the fact to any DFM 5.3 and 6.2. The exhaust is around $1250 online and figure another $100-200 install at the dealer. Intake is around $450.

 

The exhaust clearly makes up the majority of the power increase in the AT4 performance package, GM claims it alone will give a 13hp increase on the 6.2 (7hp on the 5.3). Simple math then leaves just a 2 hp increase attributed to the intake, and that hasn’t motivated me to get it yet.

Yeah, interesting.  That's just what showed up when I searched for performance package.  Mine's a 2019 anyway so I don't really care about the 2020's.  Seems confusing.

Posted
4 minutes ago, CAE AT4 said:

Yeah, it was a typo. It should be 10 HP & 6 lb-ft torque for the 5.3 with duals.

 

Here's a different link.

https://www.chevrolet.com/performance/vehicle-upgrades/new-silverado/exhaust

I'm not sure 10 (5.3) and 13 (6.2) are worth that sort of cost to be honest.  Marginal boost most won't notice other than noise I'm guessing.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,938
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    C. Hart
    Newest Member
    C. Hart
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 1 Anonymous, 605 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Thanks everyone for the help!   I'm going to stop into the scales one of these days and weigh my axels, for the time being, I am going to run Toyo's recommendations and also do a chalk test. I have a tire shop that's going to try their scanner to reprogram and set the the factory psi values lower, and if they can't I'm going to order a scanner and do it myself!
    • You won’t do better than stock exhaust without headers. Just put your favorite muffler on it and it will do the job. 
    • I have seen different people in different places post different sizes of exhaust as stock for my 2014 Sierra L83. Some say 2.5 some say 2.75. I am considering replacing the muffler with a Dynomax Super Turbo, perhaps 17739.  I had the factory L83 5.3 replaced with another L83 5.3 from Jasper Engines. I also put new Walker Cat / Y pipe on. I would appreciate opinions suggestions about what would be a good muffler setup. My main interest is a low rumble and the best flow / fuel mileage I can get. Not interested in straight through glass packs or loud exhaust. Those days are way behind me now.  Thanks Guys.  
    • Its coolant disguised as oil.   TSB 20-NA-166 -  20-NA-166 1..3   "To inspect for this concern, add coolant dye to the system, run the engine through warm up, pressurize the cooling system after warming the engine to operating temperature (let the engine cool overnight) and inspect the suspect cylinder with a borescope for coolant dye evidence. At times it may be necessary to remove the head for inspection. If the head casting line is the concern, the intake port will be wet with a coolant oil mix"     I'd say its the head, and its either leaking at the casting line and dripping down the intake into the cylinder, or its another spot on the casting itself at the cylinder that is getting wet.  
    • Can you sample the pooled liquid, enough to confirm it is oil?   ...That its not fuel or coolant.   Also, make sure combustion gases aren't entering the cooling system.   Simply put, either oil being pushed up past the rings (this really isn't possible), oil leaking past the head gasket, oil leaking past the valve, oil entering through the intake air path. If none of this is likely - it may not be oil.   What could be likely is the fuel injector leaking down. A puddle of gas would still smoke and rough idle. (Same cylinder has the same problem after injector replacement?)   What is the crank time first thing in the morning, when the puddle would be present? Does it seem like the high pressure fuel pump needs an extra second or two to rebuild the pressure that injector 8 may have let bleed off? Check the fuel pressure via a scanner prior to starting the engine.    
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...