Jump to content

C/K to Silverado Rear Axle Swap


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys, newbie here. I have a 99 K1500 Z-71. I love the truck but the brakes SUCK and always have. I have gotten to the point that I have decided to do something about it and install rear discs and maybe beefier master cylinder and or booster.

 

I am thinking that a lower cost mod would be to swap the complete rear axle for one out of a Silverado that already has the disc brakes. Has anyone done this or know if it will work. I am sure the only possible problems would be the spring-pad width and / or the shock braket width.

 

Also, has anyone done any sort of aftermarket brake upgrades they can recommend.

 

Thanks.

Posted

I have a 90 z71 1500. I baught a new rear end/axel complete from a 2500 series. The brakes are still drum but much larger than the 1500 seriesn and stop real good. I also made sure that the gears were the samein the rear before hand :thumbs::jester::thumbs::thumbs: . I also replaced the leaf springs and now can haul larger loads.

Good luck in whatever you do

Posted

Rather than trying disc brakes, where you will encounter problems with the ABS, you might look into upgraded brake components for what you have now. Praise Dyno brakes makes a good setup for our trucks, they have pads with a higher coefficient of friction and cyro-treated slotted rotors. Do this conversion along with stainless steel braided lines to firm up the pedal feel and a fluid flush and you should be set. www.praisedynobrake.com look at stage II kit

Posted

I thought I read that 90% of the stopping power is in the front two wheels. Not entirely sure if that was because I was reading up on cars/Front WD. So changing the back system won't do too much.

 

I agree with PSWired, mainly because it's cheaper! :thumbs:

Posted
I thought I read that 90% of the stopping power is in the front two wheels. Not entirely sure if that was because I was reading up on cars/Front WD. So changing the back system won't do too much.

 

I agree with PSWired, mainly because it's cheaper! :thumbs:

Its because when you are decelerating the weight is shifted toward the front of the vehicle.

The shocks are mounted at a different angle on the NBS trucks, so you would encounter a problem there too. I agree, not really feasible to do the swap when so much could be done with a lot less time and grief.

I want to upgrade the brakes on my Tahoe a bit, so I am thinking:

1. Stainless lines

2. different pads

3. slotted/ drilled rotors

4. Hydro-boost set-up. I think hydratech sells a kit to do this, or you can make your own with a set-up from a 96-00 2500HD or 3500

Posted

I'd like to hear more about this Hyro-Boost you mentioned. I took measurements from my neighbor's 03 GMC Sierra and it looks as if the spring pads and shock brackets would have to move in toward the carrier about 1.5" for it to work. I am also going to look into just replacing my drums with the discs on the NBS trucks - that shouldn't be that big a deal at all as long as no changes were made to the wheel flange on the end of the axle housing tube.

 

The rear brakes are the stock shoes that came on the truck and they still look fairly good - on the front I have replaced the pads 4 times and the rotors 1 time. The brakes have very poor feel and alot of pedal travel. I have recently flushed the fliud and bleed the brakes with no improvement.

Posted

Here is a link to the hydratech site:

Hydratech 97-99 Kit page

 

Also if you are interested in rear disc brakes there are kits available from Baer, AIM, Dynatrac and Traders and other companies to convert without having to change the axle out. The axle swap you are talking about would be a huge undertaking and potential for error is great. I would use one of these disc conversion kits. The key to setting up a rear disc system is proper re-proportioning. Baer also makes a front disc upgrade and so do others. If you can't tell I am trying to dissuade you from attempting to put the NBS axle under your truck. I think you could eventually make it work, but you are looking at a HUGE time investment for minimal gain.

 

BTW :thumbs: to see a 99 classic on here. Not too many of those floating around

Posted

So is the performance increase of the Hydoboost kit really worth the $600 they charge for the kit? How does this effect brake wear/life? I would expect the pads/shoes would need replacing more often since the added force of the hyraulic boost would cause the brakes to work harder?

Posted
So is the performance increase of the Hydoboost kit really worth the $600 they charge for the kit? How does this effect brake wear/life? I would expect the pads/shoes would need replacing more often since the added force of the hyraulic boost would cause the brakes to work harder?

On the corvette forum everybody who has put the kit in their 68-82s really likes it and highly recommends hydratech. If the kit is a bit too pricey (that IS a lot of money) for you, you can get a set-up from a 96-00 3500. That is what I plan to do when I get around to the mod. You will be able to get a used set-up significantly cheaper. Also the hydratech kit installs a t-line into the existing PS set-up. The factory set-up has a different pump, which IMO is a better set-up. My family currently has 2 factory hydroboost trucks. Neither of them seems to wear pads any quicker than the 1/2tons. The 1-tons do have bigger brakes though, so I can't say for sure. I would think that less pressure applied and longer stopping/padslipping distances would create more heat and more wear than a heavier force over less time.

If you have never driven a truck with the hydro set-up, go find a buddy with one and take it for a run. You will be impressed and ready to kick that vacuum can to the curb.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • The engine was done as part of the 6.2 recall?   You'd have to see if your VIN also has the 6.2 engine special coverage on it.  Coverage number is N252494003.  If you have this, your engine is covered under this and NOT the GM replacement part engine warranty which is 3yr/100k from the date of install.  The 3yr/100k mi warranty is in effect for non warranty purchases.     This is not any different if it was replaced under warranty without a recall or special coverage.  So if you had a 5.3 and it popped at 3 years in at 50,000mi during the 5yr/60k powertrain, the replacement engine would not get the 3yr/100k, and instead gets the remainder of the 5yr/60k as coverage.     So N252494003 gives 10 years or 150,000mi of coverage, which ever comes first, starting at the vehicle in service date.  So if your in service date is 01/01/2022, N252494003 gives you special coverage of the engine until 01/01/2032 or 150,000mi, whichever comes first.  So if your start date was 01/01/2022, you'd have left 5 years and 4 months (lets round to august 1st), or 62,000mi left of coverage.   So you need to know your in service date to know how much coverage is left.  
    • Okiee dokie there bud, way to take things to the extreme.   I guess you missed the whole point and take things way to serious. I installed different EV6 style injectors that just so happen to be larger in my car running the same LQ4 engine and with a better spray pattern than the stock style injectors and I noticed no difference in the idle quality. Kinda was my round about way of saying that even if you put the same size but better style injectors in your truck, you will likely see the same thing.    I'm sure you're great to have conversations with in person if that's how you act through a keyboard. One little things sets you off and now I guess my dick is all up in your face.
    • I can't believe that could possibly be the case. It should be 36mo/100k miles from installation. Then again, it also seems like since a dealership installed it, it'd all be in the system and you wouldn't need to worry about registering, either. Shows you what I know. 😄 Hope this one outlives the warranty!
    • I haven't seen inventory recovery from COVID.    In the few random times I 'build my own' truck or SUV, no one has the exact one I want.   GM has been working to lower incentives too for a long time.    A $500 incentive isn't getting me off the couch to go truck shopping.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...