Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a 04 Silverado ext cab and was wondering if anyone has converted or seen a conversation of the doors to fold back like the 08 ext cab does? Seems much more convenient while loading or unloading with limited space? Just curious if it's possible without a bunch of custom work.

 

Thanks.

 

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

 

 

Posted

If you're talking about converting the suicide rear doors to front opening rear doors seen on modern double cabs, the short answer to your question is no. It would take a lot of custom fabrication, think about it, the door latches would have to be moved from the B pillar to the C pillar, hinges would have to be relocated from the C pillar to the B pillar with drilling of new holes and plugging of the old ones, preferably with welds, grinding, and then painting. And the biggee, cutting out pockets in the exterior of the door to install exterior door handles not to mention the work needed on the interior of the door to make the new handles work. Not worth it in my opinion. I know the suicide doors on an extended cab of that era are a PITA, but on the flip side I think they look better than the double cabs with the exterior door handles, but I'm an old guy that appreciated the 2 door hardtops of the 60's and early 70's, thought anything with a post or a B pillar was coyote ugly.

 

Posted

No, I think the O.P. wants the rear door to just open further.    The GMT800's extended cab rear doors would swing out maybe 110-130 degrees or so, while with  newer models, the rear door will open up almost 180 degrees (or at least, noticeably more than the GMT800 doors).

 

Anyway, I would expect it to take a fair amount of fabbing.  I know the hinges to the front door are welded both to the cab and the door, the extended door is probably similarly welded,  Trying to use newer hinges in the older door/cab would be a trial and error thing, as both the cab and the door are significantly different.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Yes, I should have been more clear sorry. I was just wondering if the rear extended cab doors could be converted to swing the 180 deg. All the cool stuff out there I figured someone has tried it. Would just make it simpler to load unload in my garage if the rear door opened further out of the way.

 

Thanks.

 

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Example of how the newer trucks ex cab doors opend5559ab2d6f6b11b295d505dbb1c0014.jpg

 

 

  • 2 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,980
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Fishboat
    Newest Member
    Fishboat
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 623 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hey guys, sorry for the confusison about this. This wasn't my experainnce, it was copied and pasted fom the net. 
    • The problem with failure rates or increase failures are there’s people who don’t have a problem. What are you doing wrong they say. We had 4 5.7 GM diesel’s in the family when they came out. One was flawless. My uncle who happened to be the most abusive. Early rotary engines were known to use oil. I abused my first car so bad in six months I replaced the clutch, transmission and rear end. It didn’t use oil. My brother in law has a 2013 Tahoe and an older Yukon. The Yukon has 280K miles. The Tahoe around 175K. He runs them to about 300K. If his lifters fail before that time he would consider it a failure. My Hondas, I know people hate it when I mention them. Identical engines. One with cylinder deactivation one doesn’t have it. One shudders when the eco light goes on or off. Cylinder deactivation. But wait! According to the web. It can happen with lock up too. So now people in the know are changing the oil and transmission fluid more often. Then you read it could be a programing issue. So what do you do? There’s lots of money involved. I see three ways to deal with it. One only works if you don’t drive lots of miles. Lease, never get out of warranty. Or only buy older vehicles with a good track record. They all have bad runs. Usually when there’s a change. Even Toyota and Honda. 
    • Question @diyer2 on this line if you please. Are you saying the shudder is the system turning on and off at the frequency of the shudder? Guess I'm asking if you are saying you have seen it do this with the bi-direction scan tool in graph mode? If so have you been able to discern the 'trigger'. Something is telling to cycle rapidly.    My truck just started doing this recently. 197K on the clock. My response has been M5 anything under 55 mph. I treat it like a lugging stick shift. Gear down and let it spin a bit. Engauge M5, then tow mode and then M6 lets the trans stay in 5th but the AFM is active. Smooth like Skippy.    My thought was that as a machine ages the friction gets lower and as the system is load based, the lower friction would allow it to turn on at ever lower rpm until it reaches the lugging point. And yes I am ignorant of any minimum rpm requirement for the system. If you know that would be useful information.    As you know I run a Scan-Gauge II which allows me to watch the On/Off of the signal to the VLOM. While in the shudder mode I'm not seeing is cycle at that frequency or at all for that matter outside the triggers @newdude posted a few years back. Now is it possible that the refresh rate isn't fast enough to catch it? Maybe. It is why I asked my first question about graphing and trigging parameter.     As we have observed from members here the failure point is all over the map miles wise as you note yourself in your opening post. That by itself begs a few questions like fellows that comment on these lifters failing even after the system has been disabled. Long after. 😬   https://www.enginelabs.com/news/tech-tips-replacing-ls-active-fuel-management-lifters-with-melling/   The Gen5 lifters operate the same as the LS versions. In fact they are the same lifter.    https://www.enginelabs.com/tech-stories/sorting-out-gen-v-lt-lifter-failure-with-a-simple-valvetrain-fix/        
    • UPDATE 2: Steering wheel control backlights and control of the cluster can supposedly be achieved by adding a wire to pin 20 of the cluster and tapping it to pin 2 of the main clock spring harness. I'm going to give it a shot - will update  
    • GM Global A pickups 2019-2022 can do OTA programming for the radio.  GM VIP (GM Global B) can do OTAs for almost every module on board.  So a 2022.5 and newer pickup can do OTAs for recalls like the 2.7 fuel flow recall.  EVs get OTAs that improve one pedal driving, radio issues, HVAC issues, updated battery management software, etc.     So age of the vehicle/what GM electrical platform its on will alter what amount of updates can be pushed on OTAs.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...