Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I want to mount an amazon auto in the upper dash tray area.  It's the perfect spot for one, so that got me thinking a couple of USB ports would be cool too.   Has anyone taken that tray out, found any good spots for tapping into switched power ?  (or a route to the passenger side fuse box).    

 

thanks

 

 

Posted

Uh oh, I can’t be the only one that wants to see what’s under that tray ?  Has anyone else removed it ?

Posted

Nice ride, I looked at a red trail boss, it literally glows.  They did a good job with color depth in the paint.  
 

Im hoping someone comes up with a tech document on that tray, but my trim tool is calling my name...may do some surgery this week.

Posted

Would have been nice if they included some kind of power port up there. A usb charging port has to cost very few cents. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, bdsilverado said:

Would have been nice if they included some kind of power port up there. A usb charging port has to cost very few cents. 

Seriously !  I bought a couple of direct wire 12v usb devices, one that is a single USB port and another that provides a mini usb for a dash cam.  About $10 on Amazon.  
 

Also ordered the Gen5diy tap for the mirror power, but it ships usps slow motion mail, so who knows when it will arrive. That has an RJ11 connector for a radar detector and a 12v wire set.  
 

so I’ll put the mirror tap in and power dash cam and have the option of putting another usb/or 12v device up on the overhead console. 
 

still doesn’t solve the dash tray issue though.  Does anyone have a parts diagram of the upper dash or know where I might find one?   

  • 4 years later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,737
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Christopher Miller
    Newest Member
    Christopher Miller
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,354 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Without knowing how bad your banging is, one suggestion is the intermediate steering shaft on the steering wheel. These used to be a problem on 800 and earlier series. The feeling/sound was sometimes described as "clunking" and was felt in the wheel. Also there is a plastic piece in the lower column that is referred to as a bearing. Not your traditional looking bearing though. Your ball joints, bushings and tie rods or steering rack (if equipped) are the main point of issues. You never mention total unit miles, only that you've put 60k on it.   You can search the site for help on the ISS description. Plenty of these have been replaced   https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=site%3Agm-trucks.com+intermediate+steering+shaft&ia=web
    • Yes I have is set with the 1mm disk (Minumim Tension), for spring spacing and I raised my truck in the rear 1.5". You can go 2mm  and I think 3mm if you need.Minimum. We are on our way to TN from GA.. My wife is driving and stated she cannot believe  and   stated she can not belive the difference.
    • Most 1 ton trucks come with the factory overload spring, which need to be removed for installation of RoadActive Suspension. Removing the overload allows proper fitment and ensures the system works as intended. The RAS® Mega-Duty kit will reduce squat and provide significant improvement vs the factory overload spring.
    • I wonder as well, why they would send me a text message with links to these suggested procedures totalling over $10,000 without even the slightest hint of how they arrived at these being necessary.
    • https://precisionlubrication.com/articles/oil-filter-efficiency/     For them it is a problem of $$$$ and compliance. To cover both they have to lie from the heart.    Government wants low waste oil numbers so the bar needs to be very low on contamination to met that requirement.  Consumer wants cheap maintenance (perceived cost). Again requiring a low bar.  OEM wants high margins at a cost effective warranty rate and lots of repeat customers. More low bar.  Filter manufacture wants the same thing the OEM wants. See the pattern?   Consumers are fickle and also want perfection requiring a HIGH bar. Inconsistent with all of the above. Consumers can be, when the put their minds to it, inquisitive, love winning arguments which requires some useful information to be available to support them. And this is where it gets sticky and the lies begin.    Information needs a solid well grounded point of reference if we are to compare in a useful way. There is a standard for this.  ISO 4548-12. This standard sets the particle size at a specific Beta ratio and darn few are faithful to its intent.    If they don't state the test method they change the particle size or the Beta ratio to hit a perceived favorable standard. They obscure the information in a way as to prevent direct comparisons leaving the consumer with one method. UOA's with an ISO 4406 test result. Pricey and not allot of labs willing to do the work. Lobby work happens everywhere, not just at the seat of government.       
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...