Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Power down tailgates... the solution to a problem nobody had [emoji23]
[emoji3516]Right!? THANK YOU!

The tailgate is light. Give me a manual latch and the ability to seal my tonneau cover. I'm good.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, NWI Denali said:

Power down tailgates... the solution to a problem nobody had ?

Exactly what I thought as well! It's kind of a cool "toy", but I don't really know a practical use for it. My first question was, "is there a way to open it if the battery is dead?" Answer, "charge the battery".  I didn't think to ask, "what if the latch goes bad?" You need to open the tailgate to get the inside panel off to gain access to the latch! This will turn out to be a GM dud I'm thinking.

 

  • Like 2
Posted
On 2/23/2020 at 9:00 PM, DogMom said:

19 Silverado RST and mine does not have the alert either. I have to make sure to slam my tailgate closed due to the dealer installed tonneau cover, otherwise it will click and look closed but has come open while driving. I have tried every way possible to get an alert including hitting the interior button, exterior button, not fully latched then driving, engine on or off first... Nothing.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

If the dealer installed the tonneau, he installed the wrong tonneau cover for the electric drop gate. My RST has the dealer installed off road appearance package which includes the OEM rollup tonneau cover with the chevy logo on top of the cover. This cover is designed with a rear curtain seal that goes touches the back of the tailgate and there is a 3/4" gap between the tonneau cover and the top of the tailgate........no part of the cover or rails touch the gate when closed so it can be closed with one finger.

 

No alert? You have to shift from Park to get into gear.....when you  pull the lever through Reverse look at the camera image and if you are looking at the ground, the tailgate is open.

 

DSCN0724.JPG.ba0d8f52b9c842f15e2067a837fdb527.JPGDSCN0726.JPG.40a3b2481db553b465d2f1fbaa417249.JPG

Posted
If the dealer installed the tonneau, he installed the wrong tonneau cover for the electric drop gate. My RST has the dealer installed off road appearance package which includes the OEM rollup tonneau cover with the chevy logo on top of the cover. This cover is designed with a rear curtain seal that goes touches the back of the tailgate and there is a 3/4" gap between the tonneau cover and the top of the tailgate........no part of the cover or rails touch the gate when closed so it can be closed with one finger.
 
No alert? You have to shift from Park to get into gear.....when you  pull the lever through Reverse look at the camera image and if you are looking at the ground, the tailgate is open.
 
DSCN0724.JPG.ba0d8f52b9c842f15e2067a837fdb527.JPGDSCN0726.JPG.40a3b2481db553b465d2f1fbaa417249.JPG
To each their own on the tonneau cover but I'm a hard top girl myself. This particular tonneau cover was already recalled by GM once for safety issues (flying off while driving) but all they did was change the hardware, attach it way too snug in the middle of the bed and didn't adjust it properly. I purchased weather stripping to attach to the back to keep out the rain and realign the cover again myself as the dealers don't seem to care how they function after install. I will be replacing the cover completely with a Bakflip or retractable tonneau in the future but in the meantime I'll work with what I've got.

As for shifting into drive and passing reverse... If you read the whole comment you responded to I mentioned the tailgate clicks and looks closed but later opens when driving. This would indicate the reverse camera shows the tailgate in the closed position when shifting into reverse [emoji6]

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I had the ReTrax powered roll up w/remote tonneau on my 15 1/2 ton. It was nice.  Didn't put one on my 3500 Duramax because of the 5th wheel hitch. When I considered it for this 2020 1/2 ton, I decided I'd just keep my truck a truck and not try and turn it into a wagon/SUV. Toolbox, bed mat, done.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
I had the ReTrax powered roll up w/remote tonneau on my 15 1/2 ton. It was nice.  Didn't put one on my 3500 Duramax because of the 5th wheel hitch. When I considered it for this 2020 1/2 ton, I decided I'd just keep my truck a truck and not try and turn it into a wagon/SUV. Toolbox, bed mat, done.
 
Thanks for the ReTrax tip. I'm glad the toolbox solution works out for you as that helps with the tailgate issue.

Living in the Pacific Northwest and hauling more than just tools leaves about 2-3 months of the year of bed usage without a tonneau cover unless I want everything to get soaked or easily stolen. A toolbox also takes up considerable bedspace when loading quads and other toys so an SUV style vehicle with optional bed works for me [emoji4]

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

Posted
7 hours ago, DogMom said:

Thanks for the ReTrax tip. I'm glad the toolbox solution works out for you as that helps with the tailgate issue.

Living in the Pacific Northwest and hauling more than just tools leaves about 2-3 months of the year of bed usage without a tonneau cover unless I want everything to get soaked or easily stolen. A toolbox also takes up considerable bedspace when loading quads and other toys so an SUV style vehicle with optional bed works for me emoji4.png

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

I understand that. I used mine differently when I had the ReTrax as well. Put the rubber gasket around the tailgate, and it was totally waterproof.

  • Like 1
  • 2 years later...
Posted

I had a 2020 Denali and it had a warning for tailgate open as well as inner tailgate open

i just traded in the 2020 for a 2023 Denali ultimate and I only have inner tailgate open warning

not sure if it’s not working or gm took away the option of tail gate open warning

this sucks because it’s very easy to hit the button by accident when you’re reaching in the centre console in front of the gear selector to get something

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 473 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
    • I guess no surprise my guesses were wrong !, at least now I know if I ever happen to see it grayed out in my own truck as to what is going on.    I never happened to catch my truck with it grayed out, it seemed every time I would test to see if there was an update it never found anything and yet more than once I would check to see if there was an update and there was nothing, then a day later or even that same morning I would drive to town and after more than one engine shut down in town as I did my errands it would pop up that there is an update now ready to install and the only place I have a connection to the internet is at home by wifi so its not as if it grabbed the download while driving. I don't trust these new vehicles due to all the crap they can decide to do while sitting for some days not running and run the battery down so most of the time if I know the truck will sit for a few days I plug in the battery tender I have mounted under the hood and so the only time the truck must have downloaded software was when it was sitting in the garage where the signal is awful but I have that tender plugged in and somehow it managed to download it. I honestly detest all this crap, way to easy to leave a person stranded.    Since I don't trust any of it I don't do the install of the already downloaded software until I get home and sometimes have even sat in the truck to watch what its doing as its going through the process to its conclusion as its not like it is set up that it will tell you the next time you fire up the engine that the update that was initialed actually installed or installed properly. Yes I can go into the updates and see the list. After I go through the install where I feel its safe to do so in case it breaks down as a result, I will plug in the battery tender after the fact to recharge as I don't know how much power its taking just to do the install and that can take a while for it to install. 
    • Thanks for the reply. All settings were correct and the engine was off, as it was supposed to be. It turned out to be something simple. I took a drive for about an hour. I must have had a low battery without knowing it. The voltage gauge on the display looked ok. At the end of my drive, I shut off the engine and the update prompt came up and it updated normally. It’s ironic because one of the features of the update is a reduction of battery drain. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...