Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Closest thing to a real Blazer.  Enough with the crossover soccer mom SUVs with robbed credible model names.  

 

Give me a full frame capable off-road vehicle that is slightly smaller than a Tahoe.  Real 4wd, posi units, gear ratio options, optional diesel, manual transmission, etc.  Now that GM is pulling out of Vietnam, hopefully they will move the tooling for the Colorado platformed Trailblazer to the US and put it on the market.  If not, the new Bronco is going to blow GM away.

Edited by Duntov
Posted (edited)

Closest thing to a real Blazer.  Enough with the crossover soccer mom SUVs with robbed credible model names.  

 

Give me a full frame capable off-road vehicle that is slightly smaller than a Tahoe.  Real 4wd, posi units, gear ratio options, optional diesel, etc.  Now that GM is pulling out of Vietnam, hopefully they will move the tooling for the Colorado platformed Trailblazer to the US and put it on the market.  If not, the new Bronco is going to blow GM away.

a584b18e-fa76-4874-9c90-d6630329bd33.jpg

Edited by Duntov
Posted
19 hours ago, Duntov said:

Closes thing to a real Blazer.  Enough with the crossover socker mom SUVs with robbed credible model names.  

 

Give me a full frame capable off-road vehicle that is slightly smaller than a Tahoe.  Real 4wd, posi units, gear ratio options, optional diesel, etc.  Now that GM is pulling out of Vietnam, hopefully they will move the tooling for the Colorado platformed Trailblazer to the US and put it on the market.  If not, the new Bronco is going to blow GM away.

a584b18e-fa76-4874-9c90-d6630329bd33.jpg

I like it.  Make a ZR2 version of it and I'll have one in my driveway.

  • Like 1
Posted
On 3/10/2020 at 1:24 PM, Duntov said:

Closest thing to a real Blazer.  Enough with the crossover soccer mom SUVs with robbed credible model names.  

 

Give me a full frame capable off-road vehicle that is slightly smaller than a Tahoe.  Real 4wd, posi units, gear ratio options, optional diesel, manual transmission, etc.  Now that GM is pulling out of Vietnam, hopefully they will move the tooling for the Colorado platformed Trailblazer to the US and put it on the market.  If not, the new Bronco is going to blow GM away.

You do understand how limited the sales will be for the Bronco right, especially after the hype dies down. Look at the Gladiator, less than a year later and they have to throw a bunch of money on the hood to move them as they aren't selling.  It is a niche vehicle, the current Blazer will out sell the over seas version, the Bronco and any other off road oriented version people say they want but won't buy or actually use; they will all easily be out sold when people realize how much better everyday the current Blazer is compared to a truck version. And lets be honest, the percentage of people that actually have any actual use for the added capabilities is in the low single digit percent at best. What makes better business sense, building something for 95% of the people or 5%? I am going to guess your needs fall in the 95% group as well. 

 

Watching an overland expedition episode the other night they interviewed a TRD engineer who said they engineer their trucks for that 5%-10% of people who take it off road, that is why they are so much worse than the competition on road. The only reason their sales are so high with an inferior product is people believe they are the same reliable over built vehicle from the 80's, in reality they have slightly above average reliability that most of the manufacturers have equaled or nearly caught up to with much fresher product lines that out perform them in regular driving duties. 

 

So no, as much as I like that idea I know it won't sell here, especially a manual version which will cause it to be cancelled in a few years and be an added expense that could have been put forth to improving or building something else. 

 

Tyler

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted



You do understand how limited the sales will be for the Bronco right, especially after the hype dies down. Look at the Gladiator, less than a year later and they have to throw a bunch of money on the hood to move them as they aren't selling.  It is a niche vehicle, the current Blazer will out sell the over seas version, the Bronco and any other off road oriented version people say they want but won't buy or actually use; they will all easily be out sold when people realize how much better everyday the current Blazer is compared to a truck version. And lets be honest, the percentage of people that actually have any actual use for the added capabilities is in the low single digit percent at best. What makes better business sense, building something for 95% of the people or 5%? I am going to guess your needs fall in the 95% group as well. 
 
Watching an overland expedition episode the other night they interviewed a TRD engineer who said they engineer their trucks for that 5%-10% of people who take it off road, that is why they are so much worse than the competition on road. The only reason their sales are so high with an inferior product is people believe they are the same reliable over built vehicle from the 80's, in reality they have slightly above average reliability that most of the manufacturers have equaled or nearly caught up to with much fresher product lines that out perform them in regular driving duties. 
 
So no, as much as I like that idea I know it won't sell here, especially a manual version which will cause it to be cancelled in a few years and be an added expense that could have been put forth to improving or building something else. 
 
Tyler


I pretty much agree with you. There's a reason people buy the "soccer mom" crossovers. Nobody actually goes off road or pulls anything anyway. If they do, they buy a truck. If they don't, they buy a crossover. There's a reason these things have pretty much gone extinct.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • 5 months later...
Posted
On 3/10/2020 at 12:26 PM, Duntov said:

Closest thing to a real Blazer.  Enough with the crossover soccer mom SUVs with robbed credible model names.  

 

Give me a full frame capable off-road vehicle that is slightly smaller than a Tahoe.  Real 4wd, posi units, gear ratio options, optional diesel, etc.  Now that GM is pulling out of Vietnam, hopefully they will move the tooling for the Colorado platformed Trailblazer to the US and put it on the market.  If not, the new Bronco is going to blow GM away.

a584b18e-fa76-4874-9c90-d6630329bd33.jpg

Mary is working on electric now. All of us angry white men don't have a voice with this company anymore. I agree with you. To me this is what the Blazer should be, instead of just another run of the mill suv.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 2,951 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...