Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I wouldn't put a lot of faith in the gauge, based on the reports on multiple forums.

 

Fill it, run it for 3000 - 4000 miles and refill and do a hand calc. 

 

Remember, that the initial warnings are range/miles to empty. 

Once it thinks it's empty, there is still 500 miles til the 65 mph speed limit. Should be more than enough miles to get it to the next fuel stop and a def refill location without having any limit on speed.

Posted
19 hours ago, redwngr said:

I wouldn't put a lot of faith in the gauge, based on the reports on multiple forums.

 

Fill it, run it for 3000 - 4000 miles and refill and do a hand calc. 

 

Remember, that the initial warnings are range/miles to empty. 

Once it thinks it's empty, there is still 500 miles til the 65 mph speed limit. Should be more than enough miles to get it to the next fuel stop and a def refill location without having any limit on speed.

Thanks for the info on this.

 

Just as an update, I put almost 1300 daily driven miles on the truck, haven't towed anything yet, and just tried to add some DEF. Ended up getting about 1/2 to 3/4 of a gallon in it. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Happy to hear you’re getting that kind of range not towing. I just did a 5k round trip towing and hand calculated each full up. Consistently saw between 300-400 per gallon depending on how fast and how much climbing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted
On 7/12/2020 at 1:29 AM, cNate said:

Happy to hear you’re getting that kind of range not towing. I just did a 5k round trip towing and hand calculated each full up. Consistently saw between 300-400 per gallon depending on how fast and how much climbing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Time to update your sig and avatar with the new ride info

Posted
Time to update your sig and avatar with the new ride info

Done! Thanks!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
10 hours ago, cNate said:


Done! Thanks!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Avatar info update visible (nice truck !)

 

I'm guessing sigs don't show on tapatalk, but they do in web browser and your sig still has the 2014 info - 

 

2014 GMC Sierra SLT 4x4 CCSB 5.3L 4.10 Yukon gears, Superchips Tune

6" BDS with Toyo R/T 35x12.50r20 on OEM 20x9 wheels

AMP Research Power Steps, G4 Elite Fold-A-Cover, Rockford Fosgate 10" 500

GM DQS Tow Mirror Upgrade, Prodigy Trailer Break, Tow Spring

Build Thread

Posted
On 7/10/2020 at 6:22 PM, gSwift said:

Thanks for the info on this.

 

Just as an update, I put almost 1300 daily driven miles on the truck, haven't towed anything yet, and just tried to add some DEF. Ended up getting about 1/2 to 3/4 of a gallon in it. 

Would you continue to track the mileage?  I am wondering if there is something different between the trucks made last fall and this spring.  I only get about 500 miles per gallon of DEF even when I don't tow anything.

Posted
Would you continue to track the mileage?  I am wondering if there is something different between the trucks made last fall and this spring.  I only get about 500 miles per gallon of DEF even when I don't tow anything.

I just did the module reprogramming recall and topped off my DEF. I’m going to top it off after 1k miles and see what the mileage change is.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Posted
7 hours ago, gjohnston7 said:

Would you continue to track the mileage?  I am wondering if there is something different between the trucks made last fall and this spring.  I only get about 500 miles per gallon of DEF even when I don't tow anything.

Yeah i'll keep an eye on it.

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

So I’ve tracked about 1,600 miles since I topped off the DEF and did the module reprogram. Most of that was towing around California and out to Lake Havasu and back. Hit some grades and average slightly better on my MPG than my last hand calc on def (12 MPG versus my 11 MPG). Got 450 miles per gallon. Better than the 300-400 each time I hand calculated after 1k miles. The sensor also reads accurately all the time now. Will be i retesting to see if I can get close to the 1k per gal mark not towing. Been working remote due to covid and basically only leave if I have the travel trailer in tow these days.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted

I just picked up my new 2500 on Friday (7/31/20).  I have 148 miles and the gauge has gone from full to 1/4 full.  I'm wondering if its the gauge or actually using that much DEF?

 

Hesitated quite a bit on a diesel due to all emission regulation equipment.  Pretty frustrating for 2 days in...

 

 

20200801_205702.jpg

Posted

Hi cr2256,   I would take to the dealership and see if it has the software upgrades they have released.  That should help fix the gauge issue you are seeing.  While my DEF usage isn't great, it is definitely not that bad so I think it probably doesn't have the latest software.  Once you have that fixed, if you would track your DEF usage for me, I would really appreciate it.  I am trying to figure out if my pickup is one off or if across the installed base, everyone is not getting good mileage per gallon of DEF.

 

Posted

Thanks, I'll be taking it in early next week.  I'll let everyone know if that's what they perform.  

 

Also note that it's a 7/2020 build.  Came off the train this last Wednesday in Georgia.  Don't know if there is any relationship between build date and excessive usage.

 

Our family loves the truck besides this.

Posted
10 minutes ago, cr2256 said:

I just picked up my new 2500 on Friday (7/31/20).  I have 148 miles and the gauge has gone from full to 1/4 full.  I'm wondering if its the gauge or actually using that much DEF?

 

Hesitated quite a bit on a diesel due to all emission regulation equipment.  Pretty frustrating for 2 days in...

 

 

20200801_205702.jpg

Fill the def tank and do your own test. 

I probably wasn't full when delivered.

 

Gauge isn't a typical variable gauge -- it's trying to provide some estimate of how remaining range til empty.

If not full when put into service the calcs will give strange results. 

 

DEF tank not full has caused huge amounts of grief ever since it came in use on duramax for the 2011 model year. 

 

 

 

From https://gm-techlink.com/?p=13143

 

Segmented DEF Level Gauge

The current 2020 Silverado 1500 and Sierra 1500 models have a DEF level gauge on the instrument cluster that provides drivers with a representation of how much DEF is in the DEF tank up. (Fig. 2) The DEF level gauge does not operate like a typical float-style gauge that is used in a fuel tank. The Engine Control Module (ECM) monitors the DEF level and consumption rate in order to calculate an estimated range. DEF levels are detected by the DEF level sensor.

 

F02-DEF-2.pngFig. 2

 

There may be some fluctuation in the amount of DEF represented on the DEF level gauge. After filling the DEF tank, it may take a few key cycles to register the correct amount in the DEF tank. With the new segmented DEF level gauge, it is possible that after adding 5 gallons (18.9 L) of DEF that the gauge reads as a full tank after the fill event. However, if the actual level of DEF is just entering the last segment on the gauge, the gauge is likely to drop by one segment shortly after driving after the fill event. As a result, a driver could have an initial impression that the vehicle consumes an excessive amount of DEF.

Posted

@redwngr, thanks and that is possible. The gauge showed full but they didn't confirm that it was filled up during dealer prep.  It's possible that it wasn't full to begin with.  I need to have something else looked at so ill let them fill it and go from there.

 

Thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,913
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Smitty462
    Newest Member
    Smitty462
    Joined
  • Who's Online   6 Members, 1 Anonymous, 636 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...