Jump to content

BDS 4" vs 6"

NorCal2020

By NorCal2020
in Modifications, Wheels & Tires

 Share

Recommended Posts

Anakalypto Enthusiast

Anakalypto

Posted
Posted
[mention=229601]Anakalypto[/mention] I am new to lifted trucks but long time admirer. I just bought 2021 Sierra SLT with 5.3L, same color as yours...and I'm thinking I want to replicate your setup with 4" BDS and 35x12.50 on stock 20s.
Two questions:
1) Should I get the UCA like BDS suggests? (I will do mostly city/highway miles with some light offroading when I go hunting 3-4x per year, plus possibly pull a 23 foot boat on trailer a few times a year at most). I thought you had to get new UCA with anything over 2.5"...but maybe that's just with a basic level lift? 
2) Any reason my 5.3L would have trouble pushing the 35x12.50 Toyo A/T III? 
Thanks for any insight you have.

I don’t think changing the UCAs is needed. The BDS lift will increase your front track width about an inch or 1.5”. I have a buddy with a leveled AT4 and while he’s about as high as me up front, my front width is noticeably wider and I think looks much better.

The UCAs help with various things but a big one being correcting angles when you lift the front without dropping the front diff, just a matter of geometry because of how the control arms swing in as you increase droop.

I’m running the 6.2 and my tires are about 72lbs each, I could feel the difference but the truck has plenty of power - I’m running the 10 speed tranny though which helps a bunch. If you’re running the 5.3 with the 8 speed I’d probably try to stay in a lighter tire. Just 10 pounds makes a big difference. You’d pull the AT3 ok, but you’ll feel it. My Ridge Grapplers are 12 ply and it hits hard on bumps, kind of wish I’d gone with the AT3, may switch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Trey Smith Enthusiast

Trey Smith

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Anakalypto said:


I don’t think changing the UCAs is needed. The BDS lift will increase your front track width about an inch or 1.5”. I have a buddy with a leveled AT4 and while he’s about as high as me up front, my front width is noticeably wider and I think looks much better.

The UCAs help with various things but a big one being correcting angles when you lift the front without dropping the front diff, just a matter of geometry because of how the control arms swing in as you increase droop.

I’m running the 6.2 and my tires are about 72lbs each, I could feel the difference but the truck has plenty of power - I’m running the 10 speed tranny though which helps a bunch. If you’re running the 5.3 with the 8 speed I’d probably try to stay in a lighter tire. Just 10 pounds makes a big difference. You’d pull the AT3 ok, but you’ll feel it. My Ridge Grapplers are 12 ply and it hits hard on bumps, kind of wish I’d gone with the AT3, may switch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Good info. As for tires, looks like the AT3 in 35x12.50 are 72lbs also, but if I go with a 295/60r20 AT3 they are 60lbs and only 34" tire, which may work better with my 5.3L.

 

But that brings up another question -- if I'm only trying to run 295/60r20 tires would a 3" basic lift kit work better for me? I've read that going above 3" on a basic lift kit can cause issues down the road...but honestly I have no experience with that. It would save a few thousand bucks over the BDS (I'm not installing myself). I'm just wondering the specific drawbacks of these basic kits like Superlift w/ Bilstein or the Rancho (links below). Can anyone with these specific lifts comment on how will it ride compared to 4" BDS? Compared to stock? I believe the 2021 Sierra changed front struts to bolt-on, so all these kits must be modified before they sell a 2021 version.  

 

https://www.bilsteinlifts.com/shop/chevy-gmc/silverado-1500/2019/superlift-3-lift-kit-for-2019-2020-gmc-sierra-1500-4wd-2wd-w-bilstein-shocks/

 

https://www.gorancho.com/products/suspension-systems/chevrolet-gmc-suspension-systems/2020-2019-chevy-silverado-gmc-sierra-1500-suspension-system-rs66311r9.html

NorCal2020 Enthusiast

NorCal2020

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The difference is, you get what you pay for when it comes to suspension.

 

Most lifts that aren't purely suspension tend to add lift by adjusting the geometry of the front suspension components. However, most kits are primarily spacers of some sort, and while they do provide lift, they also tend to cause other issues down the road. Accelerated wear on other component that have now had their geometry changed due to the spacer. Plus, from personal experience, spacer lifts tend to ride a bit harsher than stock suspension due to the fact that they are usually compressing the shock, or moving the location of the shock, thereby moving the shock to another part of the suspension travel, which usually causes the ride to suffer.

 

From what I've seen on the BDS kit, (as its my first time looking in to Drop Bracket lifts), it basically maintains the stock geometry by lowering the LCA mount points (in basic terms) and extending everything else along with it. So the stock geometry effectively stays the same, UCA/LCA angles, CV/Steering shaft angles, all stay the same. A longer shock gets put in to accommodate the increased distance from shock mount to LCA (unless you cheaped out and when for the coil spacer ;(  ) and I believe I saw a differential spacer in there along with the front drift shaft spacer. 

 

I watched a couple of their install videos and looked up a bunch of reviews, seems like a solid kit to provide legit lift without having to worry about it causing some other part to fail.

 

I'm leaning more towards the Camburg AAL now and just putting a 3" or 4" block in the rear since I believe the AAL was supposed to add something like 1" or so of lift.

 

Waiting on some more funds to come in hopefully soon, might be parking the truck for a bit while it gets a lift and maybe some boost 😉

NorCal2020 Enthusiast

NorCal2020

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Also, to the guy who said Coilovers aren't that great. Well, if you live where it snows, I agree. Salted roads are bad for vehicles in general. Myself, I live on the west coast, and I just traded in a Tacoma with full Baja race suspension, so I beg to differ on coilover performance on road and off road lol. Yes they do ride a bit rougher depending on how they are tuned. Most people that buy off the shelf coilovers don't tune them at all and usually complain of the ride being harsher. If you know a tuner or know how to tune the shocks, you can easily have an amazing ride both on road and offroad. While yes, you can't quite have stellar performance on both, there is a happy middle ground. My on road ride did suffer due to tuning my shocks for jumping the truck and blasting through the desert at about 60+ MPH, I didn't feel like the on road was terrible. Mostly just slow speed stuff.

 

I fully plan on the Fox shocks with adjusters. I had the first iteration of those on my Tacoma back in the day, with just 8 clicks. I would put them at about 3 when I was just driving around in the truck, but as soon as I hit the dirt I popped them up to like 8 for better compression, and they rode beautifully. With these new DSC things, IIRC they have both low speed and high speed adjustment, Or maybe it was just compression and rebound. Either way, extra adjustment is always great.

Anakalypto Enthusiast

Anakalypto

Posted
Posted
The difference is, you get what you pay for when it comes to suspension.
 
Most lifts that aren't purely suspension tend to add lift by adjusting the geometry of the front suspension components. However, most kits are primarily spacers of some sort, and while they do provide lift, they also tend to cause other issues down the road. Accelerated wear on other component that have now had their geometry changed due to the spacer. Plus, from personal experience, spacer lifts tend to ride a bit harsher than stock suspension due to the fact that they are usually compressing the shock, or moving the location of the shock, thereby moving the shock to another part of the suspension travel, which usually causes the ride to suffer.
 
From what I've seen on the BDS kit, (as its my first time looking in to Drop Bracket lifts), it basically maintains the stock geometry by lowering the LCA mount points (in basic terms) and extending everything else along with it. So the stock geometry effectively stays the same, UCA/LCA angles, CV/Steering shaft angles, all stay the same. A longer shock gets put in to accommodate the increased distance from shock mount to LCA (unless you cheaped out and when for the coil spacer ;(  ) and I believe I saw a differential spacer in there along with the front drift shaft spacer. 
 
I watched a couple of their install videos and looked up a bunch of reviews, seems like a solid kit to provide legit lift without having to worry about it causing some other part to fail.
 
I'm leaning more towards the Camburg AAL now and just putting a 3" or 4" block in the rear since I believe the AAL was supposed to add something like 1" or so of lift.
 
Waiting on some more funds to come in hopefully soon, might be parking the truck for a bit while it gets a lift and maybe some boost [emoji6]

Not a longer shock, they space the top of the strut, but everything else is right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NorCal2020 Enthusiast

NorCal2020

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, Anakalypto said:


Not a longer shock, they space the top of the strut, but everything else is right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Depends on the kit you buy. I'll be calling them to confirm, but I've been told you can get extended shocks. And if they don't? I will be confirmed the collapsed and extended length and ordering my own from a trusted source. I don't do spacers if I don't have to.

Anakalypto Enthusiast

Anakalypto

Posted
Posted
Depends on the kit you buy. I'll be calling them to confirm, but I've been told you can get extended shocks. And if they don't? I will be confirmed the collapsed and extended length and ordering my own from a trusted source. I don't do spacers if I don't have to.

Yeah no doubt you can order longer Fox shocks, but they don’t come with the standard 4” kit. I’m running Fox rears with custom 5” lift coil overs coming next month


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Anakalypto Enthusiast

Anakalypto

Posted
Posted
Over towards the right you can choose which kit you get. Click on 4" RR CO. Those are Fox Coilovers with preloaded springs for 4" of lift. No spacers.

Ok, that’s what I said, you can get the longer shocks for another $2k, but the standard kit comes with spacers. I chose to order custom 5” lift coil overs to pick the front up a bit more instead. Not sure what we’re talking about. [emoji2371]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NorCal2020 Enthusiast

NorCal2020

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Yeah, you replied 'no doubt you can order longer Fox shocks' after I'd said If I couldn't get them from BDS I would order them elsewhere, I thought you were just agreeing with being able to find them elsewhere.

 

Anyhoo, yeah I'm not putting spacers on my truck if I can help it haha. I'm pretty leery about blocks, but we'll see what deaver says.

Edited by NorCal2020

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • richard wysong
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By richard wysong · Posted

      The timing marks are ok, that is #1, you can turn it over until they line up and it won't change anything, the crankshaft turns twice for every camshaft revolution, I have always set up SB Chevs as your pic shows using a straight edge
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      Someone's been here before.... There is a receipt for a 3-piece timing set, purchased earlier this year.   Is this picture something, or, nothing?   I have the timing cover off and my crank is perfectly TDC and the keyed gear's locating mark is dead on 12 o'clock.   The cam gear locating mark is also at 12 o'clock. Now, I'm not an expert, but all the install guides say the two locating marks should meet and be perfectly aligned when installing a timing set. The mark on the crank should be dead on 12:00 and the cam gear's mark should be dead on 6:00, and both marks should be perfectly vertically aligned.   I believe the timing gear is keyed or has a dowel that ensures it can only be installed on the cam in one position, so I have to believe the cam is out of phase somehow. At the very least, with a triangular bolt pattern, it can only be installed in one of 3 different positions.   Before I pulled the front cover, the truck was running alright, no service engine soon lights except an occasional P0172 / rich condition. Timing -16 timing at idle (should be +16), and total -35% fuel trim, two conditions I haven't been able to figure out.   In related news, my injector tested pretty well, wasn't leaking, but I had it rebuilt anyway, and it's on it's way back to me.         Along with this discovery, the good and bad:   Good: The oil pan seal appears undamaged.   Bad: -The timing cover has been reused, and the positioning dowels have been broken. That could explain some of the leaking. -Some kind of white paste or grease was used to try to seal the oil pan seal and timing cover (since wiped off..). -Then, someone globbed silicone all over the front of the cover and also buried the ckp sensor in it. But, they didn't put any inside the cover or use RTV to try to seal the oil pan seal with the timing cover (good).
    • Grumpy Bear
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      The guy that owns K&P filters last I checked in with him has over 300,000 miles on his Dodge base Hemi using his own 35 micron absolute stainless mesh filter from its first oil change.    The GM study I've posted a dozen times shows the relationship in engine life based in multiples of base units, not miles or years. That is the base unit is the number of miles the motor ran using the reference filter efficiency.    The above two paragraphs dismantle anecdotal arguments IF one changes oil often enough to prevent particle formation and the motor is in otherwise good shape. That is not full of silica (no air filter) or suffering a metallurgical issue that is not part of the lubrication discussion. Poor heat treat in example.   Data from UOA's I've reviewed from more than a few engines can show remarkably broad variations in oil cleanliness using the exact same filter over the course of an engines life.     Lastly there is the common sense of it. Wear debris WILL circulate the engine BEFORE it ever sees a filter in route to that filter and WILL harm the pump which NEVER sees filtered oil.    Alpha question then becomes, given the facts, how long do you believe is a reasonable service life from a vehicle you are certain you will not pass down? That is the junk yard will be it's resting place when you're done with it? (the moral issue most don't care about).    Omega question is then how diligent are you prepared to be in general mechanical, air & oil maintenance? Preventing particulates and keeping them sufficiently dilute; preventing the precursors from generation, amalgamation and precipitation.    If I get a good look at the engine bay of a vehicle I have a fair idea of the owners commitment to the inside of the power train. That 30 micron WIX is still more efficient than a sieve.                 
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      It also depends on what criteria someone is using for “best” when talking filters.  Are we going off best efficiency?   Best quality/QC?  Etc. because the two may not mutually exclusive.  
    • Tyler Gibbs
      PF63 Oil Filters Going Away?

      By Tyler Gibbs · Posted

      They’re not the same wiz as 10-15 years ago.  QC has fallen pretty hard.  The XP line was never good though in the first place.    https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/wix-filter-rusted-through.386492/post-6991372   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/i-ve-used-my-last-wix-filter.27299/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/looking-for-a-better-replacement-for-wix-51258.403977/   https://bobistheoilguy.com/forums/threads/convince-me-in-using-the-purolator-boss.401537/post-7420147   the forums are littered with posts and examples of not great wix filters the last couple years 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...