Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Has anyone else been contacted about joining a class action lawsuit regarding problems with the Transmissions in GM Trucks from 2014 -2019?  Particularly the 8 speed transmission.  I have a 2015 GMC Sierra Denali with the 6.2L and 8 speed transmission.  It has 49K on the clock.  It has had 2 trans fluid and filter changes at the dealership (And the service Bulletin to not use Dexron Fluid) and the transmission has been reprogrammed 5 times.  It still changes gears erratically, surges, clunks, and sometimes skips.  Occasionally it gets a shutter like you are running over rumble strips.  Dealer said its a known problem, but now my powertrain warranty is up.

 

I was contacted by a law firm that says they are building a class action law suit to have GM repair/replace the transmissions and repay any out of pocket expenses.  I would just like to have my truck fixed.  I am not one to jump on the lawsuit caravan.  Just wondering if anyone else has experienced this and if they had been contacted regarding a lawsuit

  • 2 months later...
Posted

I haven't been contacted at all, but would sure like to be.  After multiple trips to the dealership, I got my transmission replaced under warranty.  It was good for another 20-30k, but now the new trans is starting to do the same thing as the previous one.  My warranty ran out 6 months ago.  If you could share the law firm info, it would be appreciated.

 

This damn truck has been nothing but problems.  Transmission, leaking oil cooler lines, the brake vacuum pump, A/C condenser, starter, the list goes on and on.  I'd love to replace it, but there is nothing on the dealer lots right now.  And the trucks that are on the lots, they want $10k more than they were asking for the same thing a year ago.

Posted (edited)

you guys aint gonna win a class action against GM on the transmission issue.  GM is forced to lower the lifespan of these trannies because they have to meet EPA emmissions and fuel milage goals mandated by the Feds in Washington. this is a wheelspin put out by lawyers looking for a buck.

 

 

if you want reliability take the truck to a TUner, they will fix the issues, or call Blackbear for software upgrades.

Edited by pokismoki
  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 6/8/2021 at 9:39 AM, pokismoki said:

you guys aint gonna win a class action against GM on the transmission issue.  GM is forced to lower the lifespan of these trannies because they have to meet EPA emmissions and fuel milage goals mandated by the Feds in Washington. this is a wheelspin put out by lawyers looking for a buck.

 

 

if you want reliability take the truck to a TUner, they will fix the issues, or call Blackbear for software upgrades.

if that is the case, why do many places places the blame in the design if the TC?  

 

 

Posted (edited)

stock TC is fine for people who drive like grandpa's and are easy on the drive-line.  Once you start using all the potential HP these motors make you put lots of wear on the system. depending on model year , the trans thermostat overheats the entire transmission. you can add another 100 F to the trans thermostat readout on the DIC for the torque converter. GM over cycles the clutch in the TC to reduce slip, and minimize fuel consumption. I've disabled my TCC thru 1-3rd gears and i still get good mpg i lost about 1-2 MPG vs stock software, then when i disabled the TCC for 1-4th gear i lost about 3-4 MPG vs stock lock up parameters.  the stock TCC has the TC lock up in 1-6th right off the line when the most load is put on the converter GM activates lock up, high loading and high heat  in 1-2nd gear

 

like i said the software and thermostat is designed to meet EPA fuel emissions mandates by the Feds. this gives the truck awesome mileage at the cost of very high wear, and short life. 

 

the trans fluid can handle the temps, but  the clutches, bushings and plastic components CAN NOT take the heat

Edited by pokismoki
  • Like 1
Posted

My understanding is the lawsuit was thrown out. GM argued that warranty only applies to defects in materials/workmanship, not poor design.

 

That statement by gm is why I'll never buy from them again, and for that matter any vehicle. Because they're all a ****** show. Pretty soon it will only be the rich and powerful driving electric vehicles. Governments know this, they know a lot that's not being said. Why? Because its their job to maintain control of the people.

 

Whether your religious or not; believe in something or you don't. The future doesn't care. Buckle up, because covid is nothing compared to whats coming.

 

Not sure why I brought that up... If you can see and hear you already know this. Those that can't, well... you have to find it for yourself, its not something you can be shown.  

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

yes your right, just lease em and trash em'.  A family member recently started a lease on a new BMW as per my recommendation NOT to buy the thing! they keep imagining buying out the lease in 2-4 years, lol...

You should see how much electronic nonsense and Bullsh1t they installed into their cars. the entertainment system is so complicated and overwhelming that i find the car dangerous to drive , it has the computer TV screen sitting on the dash throwing all sorts of information overload at you. completely horrible experience for driving! not sure about the long term material quality, i'm sure 8 years of the suns UV hitting it, it will start cracking and flaking apart.  

 

as for the future of our country it' met its demise on 9-11, who ever is running the show now is driving the final nails in the coffin of the America we once knew... I'm learning to just go with the flow and dont believe anything you hear or see..

Edited by pokismoki
Posted

Really M1ck3y and pokismoki. SAD

  • Sad 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,488 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...