Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

For context, I have a 2016 All Terrain with stamped steel UCA and a Rough Country 2” below strut level. This weekend, I removed the 2” level, added a motofab 2.5” above strut level, new Bilstein 5100 shocks (at lowest setting) and Readylift UCA. 
 

Before my suspension upgrades, my truck measured at 38.5” at front fenders. Now it measures 40.5”. How did I gain 2” when I only added 1/2” of level? I cannot figure it out. 
 

Yes, I’m sure the Bilstein was at the lowest setting. Yes, I removed the lower strut level. Will it settle? Will alignment settle it? 
 

Currently sitting nose high by 1”. I’ve already ordered 2” rear blocks. 
 

Any feedback helps. 

00AE9268-3BE4-4E52-92F6-687F43103B96.jpeg

Posted
17 hours ago, TriZZZl3 said:

For context, I have a 2016 All Terrain with stamped steel UCA and a Rough Country 2” below strut level. This weekend, I removed the 2” level, added a motofab 2.5” above strut level, new Bilstein 5100 shocks (at lowest setting) and Readylift UCA. 
 

Before my suspension upgrades, my truck measured at 38.5” at front fenders. Now it measures 40.5”. How did I gain 2” when I only added 1/2” of level? I cannot figure it out. 
 

Yes, I’m sure the Bilstein was at the lowest setting. Yes, I removed the lower strut level. Will it settle? Will alignment settle it? 
 

Currently sitting nose high by 1”. I’ve already ordered 2” rear blocks. 
 

Any feedback helps. 

00AE9268-3BE4-4E52-92F6-687F43103B96.jpeg

Sorry for the long post

 

As I'm getting a lot older I like to spread my knowledge around. I'm only 70

 

If you install a 2.5" or any other size spacer no matter whether below the shock or above the strut spacer. 

 

The truck will go up more than the size of the spacer due to the geometry of the suspension

 

Also the geometry of the upper arm you replaced with a non-stock one could also play a part in the height. I would contact Readylift and find out if  the arm is different that the stock besides being of a stronger material.

 

On my 2017 Silverado 1500 2WD I had a 1.75" spacer that leveled the truck but not enough so the rear end was a little higher, about 3/4"  higher.  So I bought a 2" billet spacer and installed it truck went up a little less that 3"

 

I know a friend of mine installed a !/2" spacer on the lower arm below the shock and his truck went up 1"

 

Maybe someone here has the formula for the geometry and the height difference.

 

Or you can Google or Bing it.

 

Actually the 3/4 ton trucks have a different geometry, have you noticed when you drive your car in a garage the wheels squeal? it because the engineers put in understeer (move the steering wheel with less turning of the wheels) to the geometry to make it a little harder to spin the car. Most new vehicles have Variable Steering because it makes it harder to turn the steering  wheel at speed and easier to turn at lower speed. In this case they accomplish the same as with mechanical means. 

 

There are books written about car steering geometry, I used to have one when I autocrossed. Go to the SCCA website.

  • Like 1
Posted

I’m aware of this. The 2.5” leveling kit is a 1.66” spacer. I do like your thought on the UCA. That could be a factor. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Still looks like a rivet to me in the pics, I don't see a nut and none of the pics show the head of the screw. But if you says so.....
    • Thanks for all the help so far!   I did try right from 2026 right down to 2021, and only from 2023 down lets me select the option for tire psi change, but I get the vehicle not supported error!   I'll definitely try it under Chevrolet after work today, and I'll get the sensor number from gm for my truck tire sensors. And I'll let you know if it works for me under Chevrolet!   And if that doesn't work, I'm going to guess that what @Atlas said about maybe I have a different body control module could be true!  
    • From where I'm sitting this sounds like a compatibility problem. I'm assuming the 2007 was a 900-series truck, and not an 800-series (they were sold side-by-side in dealerships that model year), since it starts and runs.   This is why I HATE post-2006 vehicles. Everything becomes a huge problem when you try to keep the thing running for longer than the manufacturer has designed it to.    I can't remember when Global-A architecture started - either '10 or '11. For your sake, you had better hope it's '11, or you're going to be spending some BIG money to correct this cluster-eff. That's something you need to find out before doing anything else. You may have several computers bricked ... but the fact that it runs tells me you MIGHT be ok here.     EDIT: Just did a quick refresher. You're screwed. This is Global-A. The 2 systems are NOT compatible in the slightest. Once you get the correct engine in there that IS compatible, you're going to need to see how many computers are locked. Absolute NIGHTMARE to straighten out, too. Your buddy might be better off cutting his losses and finding something else.   Welcome to post-2006 vehicle electronics. This is why I quit the industry, and drive nothing built after 1994. This stuff takes all the fun out of wrenching!  
    • Recently acquired new 2026 Silv. 1500 WT  - L3B + 4WD,  std cab + std bed, in (duh!) Sierra White. Upgrades: replaced 'steelies' w/  Vision "Flow" black alloys,  17x8.5"; HDX nerf bar w/steps (black powdercoat); Weatherguard large/deep alloy saddle toolbox; Michelin fitted bedmat (sale, perfect fit) Weathertech door sill guards TBD: rear wheebox liners 4x black fender arch trim - searching for best  (Putco: chrome only; not looking for flares either!) -Bill    
    • True, hard to say what differences there may or may not be between Chev and GM as well as a production year or mid year part change either.    I just found it odd that under the Sierra choice on the Autel that many of the last few years of production year did not include the choice of changing the tire pressure but if that is an Autel thing or a GM thing as to why the choices were not there. Knowing what tpms sensors are on the truck should give some guidance into which choices on the tool even make sense to try as I wouldn't give up just yet with the tool but I guess he will see what if anything he comes up with if he finds out a bit more info and tries a few more things on the Autel. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...