Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello all,

Newbie from south Texas here,

 

Just wondering if there is such a thing as an update that is downloadable for the 2015 GMC Sierra (All Terrain) truck Infotainment system (Itellilink)?

Posted

I don't believe the 2015 has that capability. I know when my 2016 needed an update to give Android Auto capability, the software installation had to be done by the dealer.

  • 8 months later...
Posted

Hey Mike can you tell me what that update is called or a part number , just something I can point a dealer in the direction to find it , they keep telling me that it don't exist 

  • 2 years later...
Posted
On 2/26/2022 at 1:55 PM, mikeyk101 said:

I don't believe the 2015 has that capability. I know when my 2016 needed an update to give Android Auto capability, the software installation had to be done by the dealer.

I know this is old , but i have 2016 and I was also wondering same.  You said the dealer is only way update infotainment system for this year Sierra?  I have android Auto capability and mostly works fine, only problem i have is with calls through bluetooth sometimes get stuck after ending the call.  I have to either turn off Bluetooth or make call back and end it myself.  I am thinking update software may help...

Posted

As far as I was aware, there was only 1 software update to be able to use Android Auto and if that is working, you already have that update. Mine was a late 2015 build so it had the AA capable stereo, it just needed the software.

 

What I might suggest though is to unpair the truck in your phone's Bluetooth settings and then get into the AA settings on your phone and select to forget all cars. On my Samsung Galaxy, it is in the phone settings under connected devices. Then in the truck stereo, delete the Bluetooth pairing. I don't recall if in the truck's AA settings if there is a spot to delete your phone. 

 

Once you have everything removed on both your phone and truck stereo, re-pair the phone with the stereo, and then plug in the USB cable to launch AA. See if that makes a difference.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...