Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Guys,

 

About 3 or 4 years ago, the subject truck was my dad's.  And everywhere he went, the coolant fan would be roaring.  So, long story short I wound up putting the (seemingly) lowest duty fan clutch on it I could source.  In the end, it worked as original.  The first maybe 1/8th of a mile after cranking the fan would be engaged, but it would drop out and run quiet.

 

I'll mention, the truck has had an easy life.  It has towed very little.  And when it did tow, it towed very little.  It towed a decent load one time.

 

Anyway, the current problem is, that if I crank the truck with the A/C already on, the fan will stay engaged and roaring.  Yet if I crank it with the A/C off and drive it until the fan decouples, then turn the A/C on, the fan will remain decoupled.  But once that fan comes on, with the A/C on, it will not decouple, and will roar and roar and roar.  Even with driving the truck around like I'm driving Ms. Daisy.  I know the coolant is not getting hot.  The gauge is down in the 190° like it always is.

 

I think this fan is strictly a viscous coupling, I don't believe there is any electronic control with this fan whatsoever.  Can anyone confirm that for this generation?

 

It's annoying to be driving around nice and easy and have the fan roaring, and I'm sure it is less fuel efficient with that fan roaring.  I realize it's been stifling hot down here in the dirty dirty south, but surely it should take more than the temps being in the 90's to pull the fan into engaged.  Maybe for a short distance until the cool air is flowing through the grill, but it should drop out soon after.  There's got to be more to this viscous fan clutch than I am aware.

 

If it is just a viscous coupling controlling the fan only, I suppose this fan clutch could be on its way out as well.  I would appreciate any feedback!

Posted

If I remember correctly the less expensive fan clutch uses a silicon fluid that gets more viscous the warmer it gets thus engaging the fan, the more expensive 1s have a mechanical thermostat that's visible on the front of the clutch. the ac is probably dumping too much heat for it to disengage even at speed so normal operation maybe. the efans in my Caddy never seem to shut down either with the ac on but that may be more head pressure than temp causing that

Posted

Thanks Richard.  Seems I remember there being a metal coil on the front of the replacement one, but I'm not 100% on that.  I searched on here for normal operating temperature because I was concerned maybe my radiator might be a bit plugged.  But according to what I read, my 4.8L is spot on everyone else's.

 

Mine seems to run (by the best estimate of the gauge reading) between 195° and 200° WITHOUT the A/C.  Maybe a skosh warmer than that in lots of stop n go traffic.  WITH the A/C on, it seems to run about 8° warmer.  Something like 205° to almost the 210° mark.  And it seems that ~205° is the threshold to activate the fan clutch on this truck.

 

The cooling system seems to be nominal, I double checked the oil level (been a while since an oil change and it was perfect at the top and looked very healthy, was impressed), the A/C blows ice cold.  So, it could be just as you say, maybe it is dumping warm air right on the front of that fan clutch.

 

I'm interested in running a fan clutch that engages minimally as this truck really only hauls my fat ass around.  Not much more.  I was studying up on part numbers.  There are 2 fan clutch part numbers for my truck in all the info I found.

  • 15911779:  This seems to a little LESS heavy duty.  It reads like it is for some of these generation trucks WITHOUT A/C.  However, WITHOUT A/C trucks are going to run cooler than those with A/C (when the A/C is on anyway).  So maybe this fan clutch has to engage at lower heat levels.  I.E. Let's say they're pulling 5,000 pounds.  The one without A/C is going to be running cooler than the one with, yet may still need more air pulled through the radiator ... so maybe this one activates at lower temp.
  • 20913877:  This one seems to be the one for trucks with A/C.

However, how it is worded it seems to say the 15911779 one is for 4.8L trucks.

 

Exact wording:  "All models. 6.0l. All models. 5.3l. 5.3 & 6.0L, without ac. 2000-04, without ac. All models. 4.8l. All models. 4.3l. 4.3L, 1999-04, without ac. 5.3, 6.0L 2002-04, 8.1L. Helps quiet noisy cooling fans with stuck fan clutches\ This GM Genuine Part is designed, engineered, and tested to rigorous standards and is backed by General Motors\ Original equipment parts are designed to work with your GM vehicle safety systems -- aftermarket replacement parts may not meet the same OE safety regulations, depending on the part type."

 

Gonna break that down below to see if I can make sense of it.

 

All models. 6.0l.

All models. 5.3l. 5.3 & 6.0L, without ac.  2000-04, without ac.

All models. 4.8l.

All models. 4.3l. 4.3L, 1999-04, without ac.

5.3, 6.0L 2002-04, 8.1L.

 

In any event, it is not clear.  I have the old original part, and pictures of it, but it does not have either of those 2 part numbers on it.  It has these numbers on the front of it:  7E11F2 (printed / stamped), AAAD (printed / stamped), a small G53A (embossed / cast).  On the back it does have AC and 5.1 (embossed / cast) on it.  So I suppose that would direct me to the 20913877 part number.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,778
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    daveishi
    Newest Member
    daveishi
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,063 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Because that is IDIOTIC, much like this question. They've already been forced to do it by past administrations - why would you roll that back when it's a GOOD thing?  WHO IS ARGUING FOR LOWER MILEAGE???? 😂  NOBODY IS!!   I'm certainly not! What I want is RELIABLE vehicles again that are worth the price paid!    I don't get your logic here ...   In 2003 I paid $2,200 for our '86 Grand Marquis. It's STILL running and I've never been inside the engine, aside for the timing cover since it was leaking, so I threw a new timing set in since that makes sense. Transmission is ORIGINAL. Electric pump in the gas tank is ORIGINAL. Rear end is ORIGINAL. I'd have to hit my head REAL hard to want to pay $60k or more for a car that still can't come close to the comfort, seating and storage space, or reliability of this one. Nothing is even in the ball park! Hundreds of thousands of brands and models have been built and sent to the crusher while this one keeps on going!   https://postimg.cc/Z9XRrCSg   I've got a whole fleet of cars, motorcycles, and a truck close to this age for summer and winter. No one could pay me enough to buy anything built this century. I have zero use for any it.
    • Since I'm the one who has to fix them when they break, I'll take vehicles over 30 years old all day, EVERY day, over ANY modern crap. Have you attempted any repairs on anything built after 2006? It's a friggin nightmare, and gets worse the newer the model year.    If I had the will or desire, I can make any car of any age outside of a Model T (I don't have THAT much will ...) just as powerful, comfortable, and have all the tech the new stuff does, and get pretty close in mileage, too. I prefer SIMPLICITY. The less the vehicle has, the less to fix WHEN it breaks, not IF.   I'm glad you snot-nosed punks don't like them. More for us, plus that keeps the prices from climbing more than they already have.👍
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
    • Bringing this thread back on topic. I just noticed the incredible lack of bright chrome across the entire new lineup. Even the Denali has tinted the brightwork in the grille and has none elsewhere. None of them have chrome bumpers. As far as I can tell there aren't even chrome mirror caps. I'm curious if this also happens out back? Are there no chrome rear bumpers either? This is quite the departure for GMC.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...