Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, stu_pidasso said:

 

Hmm... MagneRide isn't air and Arnott makes air suspensions. Could it be this guy put air struts in a vehicle that take electronic struts? That would certainly explain the low nose. I always thought GM only had air suspensions in the SUVs, Ill check up on that as I could be way off. 

Now that I check Arnott's site, they do make front MagneRide replacements (non-air ride) but is only listed for the SUVs. 🤦‍♂️

Posted
Just now, Hystiker said:

Now that I check Arnott's site, they do make front MagneRide replacements (non-air ride) but is only listed for the SUVs. 🤦‍♂️

 I must've finished updating my post when you posted this but here is my update anyways:

 

Did a little googleating here, Arnott now makes aftermarket MagneRide struts but for Z95 suspension option cars. There is one front strut for GMT900 SUVs, not trucks. Magnetic Ride Shocks | Arnott (arnottindustries.com)  And they also make them for K2 SUVs but not trucks... Front Coil-Over Shock - Cadillac, Chevrolet, GMC SUVs (K2xx) w/Magneride (arnottindustries.com)

 

The plot is thickening here...

 

 

Posted

Got off the phone with the shop, he called Arnott (supposedly) and they claimed that this setup was previously approved for Sierras but they have pulled that endorsement as customers were complaining of low ride height.  

 

Supposedly... Arnott recommended to past customers a leveling kit (which I understand is nothing more than a 2" spacer).  

 

This clearly doesn't restore the lost travel in my suspension.  

 

Would this actually correct my geometry issues?  This seems more like a body lift (moving the body upward) than suspension correction (pushing the control arms downward).  Or am I wrong?

 

Otherwise, he agreed to get a quote to install OE coilovers, citing he would file a claim with Arnott to get refunded for the parts and I would pay the difference on the OE units.

 

I plan to call Arnott myself tomorrow to see if this is true, or if he incorrectly installed Yukon units.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, JimCost2014 said:

Wonder how they made them "fit"🤔😬😯

 

I'm assuming the mounts are identical, likely just shorter travel.  

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, Hystiker said:

Otherwise, he agreed to get a quote to install OE coilovers, citing he would file a claim with Arnott to get refunded for the parts and I would pay the difference on the OE units.

 

This is exactly what I would do, it's the safest option. Install exactly what was meant to go in there in the first place. It's a stupid idea to install something that wasn't intended to be installed and subsequently try and "make" it work. It's also dangerous and can cause unpredictable handling if you use components that were never designed for that specific vehicle. 

Edited by stu_pidasso
Posted

I connected with Arnott. They did in fact, say they used to sell this same kit for Silverado & Sierra but no longer do, because of the lower ride height. 

 

They said the 2" riser block was an alternative but not warrantied. 

 

Confusingly enough, if you look up part SK-3354 the general description does say Sierra. 

 

However, if you search by make/model it says N/A. 

Posted
31 minutes ago, Hystiker said:

I connected with Arnott. They did in fact, say they used to sell this same kit for Silverado & Sierra but no longer do, because of the lower ride height. 

 

They said the 2" riser block was an alternative but not warrantied. 

 

Confusingly enough, if you look up part SK-3354 the general description does say Sierra. 

 

However, if you search by make/model it says N/A. 

So, I guess at this point, do you really want this shop to even put the correct parts on your truck?

 

They knowlinly returned your truck to you with very visible problems. Granted, they "want" to take care of the problem since you called them out, but what if you did'nt? The way you describe it, almost sounds like a safety hazzard that is going to destroy the components of your frontend along with your tires.

 

Personally, would be looking for a refund and heading to another shop/dealer. 

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)
On 7/20/2022 at 10:27 PM, Hystiker said:

Got off the phone with the shop, he called Arnott (supposedly) and they claimed that this setup was previously approved for Sierras but they have pulled that endorsement as customers were complaining of low ride height.  

 

Supposedly... Arnott recommended to past customers a leveling kit (which I understand is nothing more than a 2" spacer).  

 

This clearly doesn't restore the lost travel in my suspension.  

 

Would this actually correct my geometry issues?  This seems more like a body lift (moving the body upward) than suspension correction (pushing the control arms downward).  Or am I wrong?

 

Otherwise, he agreed to get a quote to install OE coilovers, citing he would file a claim with Arnott to get refunded for the parts and I would pay the difference on the OE units.

 

I plan to call Arnott myself tomorrow to see if this is true, or if he incorrectly installed Yukon units.

 

 

I wouldn't put the leveling kit in on those Arnotts.  I'd get OE shocks and hopefully the shop who did the work will somehow cover some of this error for you either by at least eating the labor for fixing this that he created by using aftermarket components that aren't correct.  

Edited by newdude
Posted

The shop did agree to cover any labor to swap. 

 

I wound up doing a 180 and had him lower it instead. He installed the shackle kit and knocked out the blocks for free. 

 

It handles nicely, looks sporty without being silly and I've found the lower loading height of the bed surprisingly nice! I load a mountain bike in the back 200+ times a year. 

20220729_082839.jpg

Posted

Just double check that they also cut the bump stops a little. I lowered the rear of my truck 3in in the back as well and had to cut my bump stops. Otherwise you are basically riding them at the new normal height.

  • 1 year later...
Posted

I'm looking to replace my Magneride shocks too, so basically if I don't want the lower ride height, I'm stuck buying the GM OEM shocks it sounds like?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,609 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...