Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I have a 2014 Sierra and attempted to perform the pill flip, however I live in Ontario and our road salt has thoroughly corroded the thermostat housing to the point that opening it up proved impossible. 
 

I want to perform the TSB to replace the stat with part number 86774933.  I know the cooler lines are different and will require replacement for this to work.  Does anyone have the correct part numbers for what I require?  I called the dealer and predictably, they were absolutely useless…the parts guy couldn’t have cared less.  
 

I read here that 85132191 is the part number for the entire thermostat and lines assembly but am not sure if this fits my 2014.  I don’t think it does bc my truck has the lines going into drivers side of radiator whereas the descriptor for that part number says “Wo atf cooling connections on left side of radiator.”  Does anyone know for sure?


 

Edited by RobbyDawg
Posted (edited)

After much searching I’m 99% sure the correct part is 23370657.  Stealer has them in stock so I’ll be able to check it out before plunking down my cash.  

Edited by RobbyDawg
Posted

Good that you can check it out.  The main individual on here that would know is not on often anymore.  Let us know what you find out.

Posted (edited)

So, I bought the 23370657 from the dealer. The included TBV did NOT have a 70 stamped on the bottom, but I bought it anyway because I needed the lines.  I don’t believe the lines can be purchased without the TBV.  
 

Anyway, I installed them (fit perfectly) and sure enough trans temp went up to 190 ish.  
Was thinking of buying updated TBV on its own, but I’m going to try the pill flip first now that I’ll be able to actually get the darn thing apart.  I live in cold climate so was thinking against this with the concern of over cooling. However, on my 2014 the ATF goes through the engine radiator then the air to oil cooler so it might be okay.  I’ve got nothing to lose by trying it.  

 

Sheesh…after I get this sorted out hopefully I’ll have a reliable truck for many years to come.  Already had a custom tune done to turn of AFM and modify TCC logic.

Edited by RobbyDawg
Posted
20 hours ago, RobbyDawg said:

So, I bought the 23370657 from the dealer. The included TBV did NOT have a 70 stamped on the bottom, but I bought it anyway because I needed the lines.  I don’t believe the lines can be purchased without the TBV.  
 

Anyway, I installed them (fit perfectly) and sure enough trans temp went up to 190 ish.  
Was thinking of buying updated TBV on its own, but I’m going to try the pill flip first now that I’ll be able to actually get the darn thing apart.  I live in cold climate so was thinking against this with the concern of over cooling. However, on my 2014 the ATF goes through the engine radiator then the air to oil cooler so it might be okay.  I’ve got nothing to lose by trying it.  

 

Sheesh…after I get this sorted out hopefully I’ll have a reliable truck for many years to come.  Already had a custom tune done to turn of AFM and modify TCC logic.

 

You have a V6?

 

I thought the V8 routed ATF via condensor.

Posted
On 9/6/2022 at 4:12 PM, 14burrito said:

 

You have a V6?

 

I thought the V8 routed ATF via condensor.


2014 and I believe 2015 trucks route atf first to radiator then condenser cooler.  
 

I did the pill flip today and didn’t see trans  temps above 170F.  We’ll see how it does in 5 months when it’s -20!  

Posted
1 hour ago, RobbyDawg said:


2014 and I believe 2015 trucks route atf first to radiator then condenser cooler.  
 

I did the pill flip today and didn’t see trans  temps above 170F.  We’ll see how it does in 5 months when it’s -20!  

 

It will do just fine. Run just like they did the first hundred years without a thermostat. 

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, RobbyDawg said:


2014 and I believe 2015 trucks route atf first to radiator then condenser cooler.  
 

I did the pill flip today and didn’t see trans  temps above 170F.  We’ll see how it does in 5 months when it’s -20!  

 

Uhh, if that the case....I don't get it.

 

Crack temps:

ATF thermostat is 180

Coolant is 207

 

The ATF full open is less than the crack temp of the coolant thermostat...

 

So they warm the ATF to cool at the condensor? 

Edited by 14burrito
Posted
3 hours ago, 14burrito said:

 

Uhh, if that the case....I don't get it.

 

Crack temps:

ATF thermostat is 180

Coolant is 207

 

The ATF full open is less than the crack temp of the coolant thermostat...

 

So they warm the ATF to cool at the condensor? 

 

Yep. Dizzy right? The idea was to get the fluid up to temp quicker. Then there is this. The 207 F temp is the engine outlet temperature. Radiators job is to lower that to something lower, right? Like about 20 to 30 F lower for a fin fan exchanger which a radiator is. 

 

Thing is the V8's uses the hot side as the cooler while the V6 uses the cold tank as the cooler which means for the V8 to cool the inlet ATF temp has to be above 207 F and it is. So the hot side is a first stage cooler then off to the condenser for about 20 F more. The V6 doesn't use the AC condenser. Just the cold tank. No idea why they complicated a hammer like this but is what it is. They both end up the same. The V6 just uses less equipment to get there. :rolleyes: 

 

Mine is a V6 and for some time I did the pill flip. Recently I installed the 70C thermostat and guess what? It runs warmer in the winter and the same in the summer as the flip. Needs more cooler than the factory set up to maintain the throttling temperature of 148 F on days with ambient temps over 80 F. I'll get to it. 

  • Like 2
Posted
12 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

Yep. Dizzy right? The idea was to get the fluid up to temp quicker. Then there is this. The 207 F temp is the engine outlet temperature. Radiators job is to lower that to something lower, right? Like about 20 to 30 F lower for a fin fan exchanger which a radiator is. 

 

Thing is the V8's uses the hot side as the cooler while the V6 uses the cold tank as the cooler which means for the V8 to cool the inlet ATF temp has to be above 207 F and it is. So the hot side is a first stage cooler then off to the condenser for about 20 F more. The V6 doesn't use the AC condenser. Just the cold tank. No idea why they complicated a hammer like this but is what it is. They both end up the same. The V6 just uses less equipment to get there. :rolleyes: 

 


I wonder if the 2014/‘15 design is a carry over from 2013 and prior models which as we know had no trans stat.  Since the  trans t-stat is closed until 180, there’s no warming of the ATF going on at all.  Now with my pill flipped the ATF is actually warming faster which might prove beneficial to fuel economy, (very slightly).

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
    • 2024 Silverado 2500 HD LTZ grille no camera Parts list   84603331 84913656 84913657 84913654 84913655 84911567 84911568 85646092 85646093 85797921 85797922   11570637  x10-15   grille/bumper bolts 11546500  x10      grille clips 11571006  x10      push/retainer clips 11546454  x6       nut retainers 11611609  x6       M5 bolts 11610700  x6       molding/trim retainers
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...