Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Oh boy, My VLOM failed recently and took out my lifters, cylinder 7. I replaced it with the latest version VLOM. I am concerned that what took it out was high oil pressure. When above 3500RPM and the high pressure oil is activated my pressure appears to climb passed 550KPA. My mechanic said he saw over 100PSI on his snap-on diagnostic tool? Is it possible that the pressure relief valve is sticking? this is only intermittent, sometimes the pressure stops at the 7/8 mark, sometimes the needle is buried. 

Has anyone else seen this?

Posted

RustyGunz, I went through the exact same issue 4 times over and basically without my truck for 3 months.  I had to demand the mechanic change the VLOM and the pressure relief valve before the high pressure and failed lifters went away.  Mechanic said with every failure "higher pressure is better than lower".  In the end he was sucking on that higher pressure as he had to cover the cost of each failure after the first.  If I were to go through it all again, I would change the VLOM and get a plug-in AFM Bypass module and see if your pressures subside.  If not, you will be into removal of the oil pan and possibly oil pump.  Good luck and let us know how it goes.    Note:  The dealer, who I was conversing with through my difficulties, was certain the high pressures were the result of a faulty VLOM.

Posted

There is a new revision of the Oil Pump for the LT 5.3 and 6.2. I installed the new version when I did a cam. The shop that tuned it said they have seen Camaros and trucks lose the oil pump and destroy the engine

Posted

Kevin, Thanks for the feedback. By plug in AFM bypass you mean bypassing the 4cyl mode right? curious how that would affect oil pressure? I needed my truck back for work so I have been staying away from high RPM until I get this dealt with. It really seems intermittent at the higher pressure. I have added oil treatment to see if maybe the PRV is gummed up.

 

Posted
5 hours ago, RustyGunz said:

Oh boy, My VLOM failed recently and took out my lifters, cylinder 7. I replaced it with the latest version VLOM. I am concerned that what took it out was high oil pressure. When above 3500RPM and the high pressure oil is activated my pressure appears to climb passed 550KPA. My mechanic said he saw over 100PSI on his snap-on diagnostic tool? Is it possible that the pressure relief valve is sticking? this is only intermittent, sometimes the pressure stops at the 7/8 mark, sometimes the needle is buried. 

Has anyone else seen this?

 

Your pump and VLOM are working as designed. 

 

From the shop manual:

Hot oil pressure minimums.

22 psi @ 1,000 rpm

30 psi @ 2,000 rpm

33 psi @ 3,000 rpm

 

Takes 22 psig MINIMUM to properly work the lifters. Lifters don't fail from to much pressure. 

They will fail from to little pressure, aeration/foaming or anything that causes these conditions. Plugged screens, low oil levels, over heated oil. Wrong oil. Leaking VLOM seals. Plugged galleys. And yes, mechanical failure of the lifter itself as well.   

  • Thanks 1
Posted

If oil pressure was too high is it possible that it caused the solenoid in the VLOM to leak or pass oil pressure to the lifter when it wasn't supposed to which in turn causes the pins in the lifter to collapse when under load? Is the updated VLOM supposed to be more reliable? I can't seem to find any info on the oil pump PRV so maybe I am going down a rabbit hole I don't need to? sure don't want to have to go down this road again, especially trying to find a new VLOM lol. Might try e-mailing GM themselves. 

Posted
49 minutes ago, RustyGunz said:

If oil pressure was too high is it possible that it caused the solenoid in the VLOM to leak or pass oil pressure to the lifter when it wasn't supposed to which in turn causes the pins in the lifter to collapse when under load? Is the updated VLOM supposed to be more reliable? I can't seem to find any info on the oil pump PRV so maybe I am going down a rabbit hole I don't need to? sure don't want to have to go down this road again, especially trying to find a new VLOM lol. Might try e-mailing GM themselves. 

 

No...take a solenoid apart on your old unit. Oil pressure works to close the valve, not unseat it. Yes a seat could leak but pressure would have nothing to do with it. Don't take my word for it. Take it apart of look. 

 

https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2013/SB-10071670-5448.pdf

 

Go to page 7. Does not have a traditional PRV. Oil pressure is controlled by the multistage pump, wear and viscosity. Temperature dependent viscosity.  

  • Like 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

No...take a solenoid apart on your old unit. Oil pressure works to close the valve, not unseat it. Yes a seat could leak but pressure would have nothing to do with it. Don't take my word for it. Take it apart of look. 

 

https://static.nhtsa.gov/odi/tsbs/2013/SB-10071670-5448.pdf

 

Go to page 7. Does not have a traditional PRV. Oil pressure is controlled by the multistage pump, wear and viscosity. Temperature dependent viscosity.  

Ahhhhh, Ok so there is no PRV to release any excess pressure when in the high stage from the looks of it (maybe that's why I can't find any info on it haha). I'll have to get my old VLOM back and check to see what's wrong with the solenoid for that cylinder. maybe the solenoid is flakey or leaks. Would sure be nice to have some confidence that it was just the VLOM that ****ed up. There is a GM bulletin somewhere that says change the VLOM with the lifters.

Since you seem knowledgeable on the subject, is it common that the oil pressure sensor is flakey? everyone I know with this truck the oil gauge (which doesn't seem very accurate or fast acting) doesn't go full scale when in high rev's. Is it common for the VLOM to be the issue?

Posted
10 hours ago, RustyGunz said:

Since you seem knowledgeable on the subject, is it common that the oil pressure sensor is flakey? everyone I know with this truck the oil gauge (which doesn't seem very accurate or fast acting) doesn't go full scale when in high rev's. Is it common for the VLOM to be the issue?

 

What is common is the screen under the OPS being partially plugged. Yes you are to replace the VLOM when you do a lifter service. No the gauge is not accurate nor responsive as you suggest. Not bad at mid scale but poor at either end. Span error. 

 

There are screens in the VLOM at each solenoid. Third line of defense. Second is the screen under the OPS. First is OCI and good oil. 

 

 

Posted
23 hours ago, Grumpy Bear said:

 

What is common is the screen under the OPS being partially plugged. Yes you are to replace the VLOM when you do a lifter service. No the gauge is not accurate nor responsive as you suggest. Not bad at mid scale but poor at either end. Span error. 

 

There are screens in the VLOM at each solenoid. Third line of defense. Second is the screen under the OPS. First is OCI and good oil. 

 

 

Ok thanks for the help, I think I’ve done all I can to avoid another lifter failure. I believe my mechanic has checked all the screens.

  • Like 1
Posted

Hi RustyGunz,  I am no mechanic so take my experience with a grain of salt.  I can attest to having the exact same issue and no-one would grasp the severity of the massive amount of pressure I saw on my gauge.  I swear if the gauge could read 100psi, it would be there and get there almost instantly when reaching 3000-3500rpm.  My low side was around 25psi at <1000rpm when hot so the range of the sensor was not skewed per se.  A new pressure sensor measured the exact same thing by the way as it was one of the first things I tried.  Did I mention this was after a brand new Oil pump was installed so can't blame the issue on that.  It wasn't until the 4th failed lifter (replaced all of them the first round) did my mechanic change the VLOM (and pressure bypass in the 2-stage oil pump housing/system - so he said).  I don't know for sure if he actually changed the pressure bypass but the GMC Dealer mechanic I was also corresponding with was certain the high oil pressure was from the VLOM.  When the new lifters failed, they were destroyed - mechanic said he never saw anything like it, even mentioned it looked like they exploded!  Also, it was a different lifter every failure.  Once the pressure subsided (always less than 80psi) , no more lifter failures. 

 

I'm not sure which fixed the issue and my prior suggestion with the AFM bypass was because I felt every failure I had was due to the AFM trying to kick in and the VLOM too sluggish to respond in time.  I thought it might save you from repeated failure until you saw that pressure go back to normal.   

 

Posted
18 hours ago, KevinRum said:

Hi RustyGunz,  I am no mechanic so take my experience with a grain of salt.  I can attest to having the exact same issue and no-one would grasp the severity of the massive amount of pressure I saw on my gauge.  I swear if the gauge could read 100psi, it would be there and get there almost instantly when reaching 3000-3500rpm.  My low side was around 25psi at <1000rpm when hot so the range of the sensor was not skewed per se.  A new pressure sensor measured the exact same thing by the way as it was one of the first things I tried.  Did I mention this was after a brand new Oil pump was installed so can't blame the issue on that.  It wasn't until the 4th failed lifter (replaced all of them the first round) did my mechanic change the VLOM (and pressure bypass in the 2-stage oil pump housing/system - so he said).  I don't know for sure if he actually changed the pressure bypass but the GMC Dealer mechanic I was also corresponding with was certain the high oil pressure was from the VLOM.  When the new lifters failed, they were destroyed - mechanic said he never saw anything like it, even mentioned it looked like they exploded!  Also, it was a different lifter every failure.  Once the pressure subsided (always less than 80psi) , no more lifter failures. 

 

I'm not sure which fixed the issue and my prior suggestion with the AFM bypass was because I felt every failure I had was due to the AFM trying to kick in and the VLOM too sluggish to respond in time.  I thought it might save you from repeated failure until you saw that pressure go back to normal.   

 

Thanks for the reply, 

so now your oil doesn’t go right off the gauge? I’m having mental trouble pushing it to that level lol

I’m pretty sure my failure was from the cylinder 7 going into 4 cyl mode under load. 
Starting to think the best solution is a for sale sign

Posted

Hi RustyGunz,  

That is correct, the top pressure I now see is 75-78psi with petal to the metal.  Low side is still the same before and after the high pressure situation.  I am leaning more toward the new VLOM fixed that issue - I think the old one, despite testing fine, was a little sluggish not visible during static testing.

 

Technically the AFM should not activate under load so I don't know.  I can say I babied my ride almost every time I got the truck back, very careful not to let the pressure get too high and still failed within 100miles every time.  I too was looking hard at putting a for sale sign on mine but knew I would feel bad if it happened to the next person.  With the price of new and used trucks, I just couldn't afford it this year.  I even contemplated a trade in on another brand but it simply wouldn't stay running long enough to make that happen.  I feel your pain and wish you the best whatever you do!

Posted

FYI:  My Sierra did not have a screen under the pressure sensor, and according the the dealer and my VIN, it does not come with one.  Changing the pressure sensor made no difference on anything.

Posted
On 10/17/2022 at 7:30 AM, KevinRum said:

FYI:  My Sierra did not have a screen under the pressure sensor, and according the the dealer and my VIN, it does not come with one.  Changing the pressure sensor made no difference on anything.

So you changed the oil pump and the pressure never went above 78psi? I’d say mine hit 80psi once out of the last 5 times over 3500rpm. Usually stops at work the second last increment I. The gauge. Going to take it to the dealership to get a second opinion on this oil pressure

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • As a matter of amusement I’ll leave this conversation with this. Do you beat the government average fuel estimate? Statistics are a guide to me. Not a rule. Someone once said I have to have the last word. If true and possible may be. I’ll blame that on working in a family business.
    • That is a fair point, and I agree that trying to log “everything in the truck” would be the wrong direction.   There are a lot of modules and a lot of traffic. If the product became a full-truck datalogger, the amount of data would get huge very quickly, and most owners would never use it.   I think the first useful version would need to be narrow: - powertrain-side event evidence - selected high-value parameters - communication / voltage / reset events - pre/post event window - short report first, raw log only as backup   One distinction I should make is between active OBD/PID polling and passive bus capture. If you are polling PIDs through OBD, then yes: the more parameters you request, the lower the effective sample rate becomes, and you are adding diagnostic traffic to a vehicle that is already busy running itself. With passive CAN capture, the recorder is not asking all the modules for data. It is listening to traffic that is already on the bus. So it does not consume vehicle bus bandwidth in the same way that a scan tool polling hundreds of PIDs would. But your point still applies in a different way.   Even if passive capture does not add bus traffic, the recorder still has limits: - processing rate - storage rate - timestamp accuracy - decoder workload - event filtering - report size - user attention span   So the answer cannot be “log everything and let the user figure it out.” The product would need to store enough raw evidence to be useful, but only decode, graph, and present the important parts around the event.   A practical report should probably show: - what triggered the capture - how much pre/post data was preserved - which selected parameters changed - how those values compared to baseline - whether the same pattern happened before - whether any voltage, reset, bus-off, lost-message, or communication fault occurred - selected graphs around the event - raw data only as supporting evidence   So I agree with you. More data is not automatically better. The real product is the reduction from raw data into a useful event report.
    • That makes sense, and I agree with most of that.   I think the product would need both: 1. a default powertrain template, so it is useful out of the box; 2. user-selected priority parameters, so the owner or shop can choose what they want to see first.   Different users are going to care about different things. One owner may care about oil pressure and voltage. Another may care about misfire trend, AFM/DFM behavior, or U-codes. A shop may want communication events and repeatability first. Your baseline point is probably the most important one. Raw data is not very useful unless the report can show what normal looked like for that vehicle under similar conditions.   The way I would think about it is: - start with a basic known-good baseline - learn normal behavior for that specific vehicle over time - allow the event to be overlaid against baseline - show whether the event was a one-time spike or a repeatable pattern - provide a simple severity level, but with clear limits on what that severity means   For example, early severity could be something like: - Info: event captured, no obvious abnormal pattern - Watch: value moved outside baseline, but not repeated - Warning: repeatable abnormal pattern under similar conditions - Critical: communication loss, voltage drop, bus-off, reset, or severe repeated event   I would not want the first version to say “replace this part.” That would be overclaiming unless there is repair-confirmed data behind it. It would be more honest to say “this pattern deserves inspection.”   On the OBD port question, I think OBD absolutely has a role. OBD is probably the right place for: - DTCs - freeze frame - VIN - calibration information - normal scan-tool parameters - Mode 6 / enhanced diagnostic data if available The reason I am still looking at an ECM-side recorder is that the failure may happen before anyone connects a scan tool. If the owner plugs in a scanner after the event, the pre-event evidence may already be gone unless the ECU happened to save it. So I do not see this as “OBD versus ECM-side.” I see it more like: - ECM-side recorder: always armed, rolling buffer, event evidence - OBD/DLC companion: DTCs, freeze frame, VIN, calibration, normal scan data - phone/cloud: status, notes, upload, report generation, notifications   I agree that phone connection and push notifications would be useful. I just would not want the phone or cloud connection to be required for capture. The recorder should save the event locally even if the phone is not connected. The phone should help with event marking, download, notes, upload, alerts, and report viewing.   For a default GM V8 event report, would this list make sense? - RPM - calculated load / MAP - throttle position - vehicle speed - gear / torque converter state if available - coolant temperature - oil pressure - oil temperature if available - battery voltage - commanded AFM/DFM state if available - actual AFM/DFM state if available - misfire counters / roughness by cylinder if available - fuel trims - relevant U-codes / communication events - bus-off / lost periodic message / module reset / voltage drop events Which of those would you remove, and what would you add?
    • I went to the county a few years back to dispute my property taxes. To do that I hired an appraiser and a lawyer. The County Assessor wished to argue that the homes in my neighborhood the appraiser used were all 'distressed properties" and not representative of the "Market Average".    My response was," Of the 50 homes in our subdivision 43 of them were "distressed properties" under bank foreclosure and as such "Distressed IS the market". Lawyer about choked on his coffee and handed the Assessor the 'receipts'.    I won that case on the evidence provided by the Lawyer and the Appraiser.    We have the same thing going on here. My statements were based on the GOVERNMENTS NATIONAL DATA and yours on local markets in areas of your interest. They are both correct....   Thing is, this divergence was based on NATIONAL and not on LOCAL. I think you even understand that. But like you said, we are both stubborn and hardheaded.    I do not see any advantage to disengagement.  But that said we can step back to compose ourselves. 
    • Trust me I appreciate the comments and concerns. It's what I was looking for to help me evaluate the situation and what I want to do. I have decided to move forward with the BORA hubcentric slip on 3/8" (.375") with the extended lugs nuts. Fedex says they should be here Monday :). Meanwhile, the dealer got the remote start and Patriot spray in bed liner done over the last couple of days. Also, I installed an inline stop/start eliminator today. Starts back up in what whatever mode you shut it off in, so you don't have to hit the button every time you fire up.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...