Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The truck is a 2006 GMC 1500 Denali with a 6.0.... It had codes for upstream o2 sensors, random miss fire and a few for MAF. I changed the MAF and o2 sensors and the miss fire code went away, however the truck still won't accelerate the way it should and still stalls and has no codes. I thought maybe the fuel pedal switch (And I'm not a parts thrower atter), I thought fixed it.... still has a power loss and stalls every so often... enough that I can't drive it confidently. 

 

My next option is to check fuel pressure or change the TPS....  Maybe hoping someone here may have an idea before I even go that route.

 

Posted

Would you still think that if I told you while driving and I put it in neutral, shut it off and start it back up... put it in gear and get on the pedal it accelerates fine and dandy? Then let off the pedal, get back on it and then the lack of power/acceleration issue is right back? 

 

Yes... I know I left that out in my initial post... whooops! 

Posted (edited)

By shutting it off you are releasing the back pressure from the partialy clogged cat. Try removing the upstream 02s and see if it improves. make sure the exhaust from there doesn't melt anything or start a fire. I don't know if the parts store has the gauge to measure the back pressure in their loaner program

Edited by richard wysong
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Well, being I just replaced them, they shouldn't be that hard to remove.. other than the placement of them of course... I'll get back to on this.... Thanks (fist bump) 

Posted
18 hours ago, noobie said:

code went away

Trouble code indicates an issue with a circuit, not necessarily a component. You could have replaced a good component with something that was defective right out of the box and still not have solved the issue.

Posted (edited)
16 hours ago, richard wysong said:

Let us know how you make out

Removing the upstream sensors did not do the trick. Man did it sound like a demo car though.

 

 

 

Edited by noobie
Posted (edited)

OK, Time to check the fuel pressure AND VOLUME, use a fp gauge with a dump valve on it, if the volume is good it should stay running with the dump valve wide open. Douglas is correct that the sock in the tank may be getting clogged, I don't think it has a regular fuel filter

Edited by richard wysong
Posted (edited)

Checked fuel pressure. When hitting the key just to prime it, I got 40lbs. I let it set for about 20 minutes and it stayed there. While running, it was just above 50. My gauge didn't have a dump valve on it to try that exact method. And of course the thing didn't even stumble when I had the gauge on it. Before I pull the bed and tackle the pump I may try this with a different gauge. 

 

In the mean time I figured I would check plugs... two were loose. They're original to my knowledge I'm changing them regardless being there's just under 160,000 on the truck.

 

Edited by noobie
Posted

New plugs took the stumble and stalling away but, there is still a lack of power.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 3,061 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...