Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello everyone I’m new to this forum so I hope this is an acceptable topic.

I have a 1996 K1500 4.3L and I’m having heating issues. Started off with no heat and ended up needing a thermostat. That worked for a winter and now we’re back again. I determined the heater core was not allowing fluid through so I put a new core and hoses in and confirmed fluid is flowing as well as another 195° thermostat just for good measure but the truck still has questionable heat. Where should a guy look next? It runs pretty consistently at 170°F despite the 195° thermostat.

 

Posted

Are both heater hoses about the same temp?  if not the core is restricted still. if so the blend door or actuator is probably stuck or not working. does the truck have a/c and electronic control or no a/c cable control?

Posted
1 hour ago, Zachtheame said:

as well as another 195° thermostat just for good measure but the truck still has questionable heat.

What brand?

If not OEM then Motorad is one to look for.

Posted

sounds like there's still a restriction in the coolant lines. maybe in the fittings for the heater hoses on the engine? Does the return line go to the radiator or the water pump? Inlet temp should be the same as engine coolant. You could reverse flush the heater core with a garden hose just to make sure it's clear

Posted

We replaced the inlet and return lines completely except for the metal tube section in the middle which we cleared with a wire bottle brush. If there is an obstruction it would have to be within the water pump itself but I pulled the outlet line off and ran it and the flow seemed as free as I would expect it 

 

The supply line originated in the block and terminated at the water pump 

Posted

you got your self a real head scratcher! you replaced the Fitting on the intake manifold ? The oem fitting was a quick connect aluminum deal that was prone to corrosion. Even if engine temp is only 170 you should have good heat. as stated if the heater circuit is clear the inlet should be same temp as engine and return only a few degrees cooler at 1200 rpm 

Posted

We sure did, the fitting snapped when we tried removing it necessitating it’s replacement. It sure is a head scratcher, we’ve tried everything. And it’s something that happened between this year and last year because the heat was stellar last year 

Posted

some radiators have a nipple for the return line that would be capped off where yours returns to the water pump, if you have that you could switch the return to there and cap the water pump nipple and see if that helps

Posted

Right side just below the rad cap, not all rads have it. if you are 100% sure the core and lines are clear I think the only other thing it might be is that the passages in the intake manifold may be blocked by corrosion which would entail removing the intake to check and clean although you maybe able to check with a borescope camera if you drain some coolant

Posted

Either Lisle or KD makes a heater flushing attachment for a garden hose that has an air fitting on it to give a blast of air along with the water. I added a water shut off to mine  to save going to the spigot to shut it off

Posted

when you removed the return line from the water pump there should have been no flow from the water pump nipple with the engine running and strong flow from the return line. A defective heater core is a VERY remote possibility BUT if there is good flow the lines would be the same temp so probably not that

Posted

Well I replaced the heater core and lines so that’s already been eliminated and there is good flow coming from the return of the heater core so I am starting to suspect the issue is on the return side

Posted

I have never seen a problem in the water pump but I guess anything is possible. Its not a hard pump to r&r  to check it.  No nipple on the rad I take it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I agree with this assessment. As you know I’m testing longevity with vehicles for the first time. I have a few vehicles I passed to kids and grandkids. We’re all past 100K miles some approaching 170K. I’m the only one doing 5k oil changes. The rest whatever the minder says. I’m the only one doing frequent transmission service. My odyssey the trip vehicle at 200K will be finished as a trip vehicle. I recently changed to high mileage oil, Valvoline. I can’t get past the fact that all manufacturers want to claim long service life. I just don’t make sense that they would go with low weight oil for mileage. While sacrificing longevity.
    • There's absolutely a mountain of profit in catering to the "I do my own research" crowd, people who are certain they know better. And I don't mean there isn't data to support that 0w40 produces less wear product than 0w20 in an engine like the 3.0 Duramax, that only feeds them the assurance they need. Again, my whole thing with oil selection is, sure, 0w40 or 0w30 produces less wear product. Are we talking the difference between the engine lasting only 100k versus 200k? Or are we talking more like, if the engine will already go 350k on a good 0w20 regimen recommended by the OE, is using 0w40 going to get us to 355k, assuming we can even get the rest of the truck to last that long, meanwhile sacrificing the first 5y, 100k in powertrain warranty. The answer isn't easy, there are tradeoffs.   I willfully use 0w20 Dexos D for this reason, knowing that a 0w40 will produce slightly less wear. I don't believe the delta in wear product is meaningful over the lifetime of the engine, and I place much more importance on driving style and overall feeding and care of the engine as a whole. It's the mentality that someone can abstain from alcohol their whole life which is an amazing boost to health by itself, theoretically. But if they're sedentary, that lifestyle choice will most likely kill them young despite their other, concerted efforts. Maybe someone doesn't drink AND they are the perfect picture of health and activity AND they use 0w40 AND they treat their engine perfectly. If living until 130 years is the goal, sure, do that. But it's going to be a really old truck falling apart around a good engine for that last 30 years, without a doubt.   I watched Demonworks' other video on the 100k+ 3.0 Duramax that had dealer 0w20 changes on what appears to be OLM-prescribed intervals (8-10k).   The QR codes are still present and readable on the main bearings. That's how little wear it has.   That's not proof that anyone else should stick to 0w20, but it's confirmation, for me, that 0w20 is perfectly acceptable to use in these engines.
    • 1Based on independent testing of OE 0W-20 in the Peugeot TU3M Wear Test as required by the dexos1 Gen 2 specification.
    • oh ya that's good to know - I would rather use a gear than the brakes down a long hill.  I would not let cruise control take over on snow or towing a trailer for sure on hills anyway.     The other thing about the CO trip was that was all done above 6K feet for the most part, so that has to use more gas as the motor is down a good amount of power up there.   If I drove my 2016 Camaro with a very similar V8 to this 6.6 it would probably get about 23-24 on the fast run up to NE.  But the premium fuel premium is steep here in CO, so it would still only save about $40 in overall costs for the round-trip.  And you sure can't carry much gear in a convertible camaro!
    • Got part #s of what you ordered vs what you got?  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...