Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey all, my 2002 Silverado 2500HD 8.1L w/ Allison transmission recently started making an intermittent but rhythmic squeaking/scratching noise that seems to be coming from engine internals. Video of engine noise https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1ANVafHeQLibrg7velXbiScdqP4Fb3hlF

Noise is about the same through rpm range. Engine has 240k on it, no aftermarket modifications. Fearing lifter failure I went ahead and pulled the intake manifold to inspect lifters, did not see any loose retaining clips and felt all pushrods, none have excessive play. Attached pictures of lifters. Cam lobes that I could see looked fine. When I get off work I will spin the engine over, feel all pushrods for play as the bad one could be compressed and not showing play currently. Also will pull the valve covers and inspect springs/rockers. I know I jumped the gun by tearing down but has anyone else had experience with this noise? Sound seems to be coming from top end, not a deep noise like bottom end. I do have a one snapped off exhaust manifold bolt, rest are tight but doesn't sound like an exhaust leak to me. Appreciate any input thanks.

20230405_213055.jpg

20230405_213030.jpg

20230405_213040.jpg

20230405_213042.jpg

20230405_213046.jpg

20230405_213049.jpg

20230405_213053.jpg

20230405_213058.jpg

Posted

Found it, looks like a lifter failed and destroyed a lobe on the Camshaft. Also slightly bent pushrod and scoring on another cam lobe. From how deep the groove in the cam is I assume there has to be metal debris in the engine. Seems i should replace the long block or rebuild this engine entirely short block and all. Only other option I can think of is pulling and cleaning put the oil pan, replacing just lifters/pushrods/cam and praying no oil galleys get blocked.. Any advise appreciated!

20230407_194759.jpg

20230407_193854.jpg

20230407_193917.jpg

20230407_200420.jpg

Posted

In all honestly, that is a pretty common failure to see on the camshaft.

 

Also pretty common that if you just look at the cam bearings, they will be worn. But it you don't look at them, then they won't ever be bad. It's the game we play when swapping LS camshafts lol.

 

If it was me I'd rolling the dice. Think about it a little, it took a long time for the lobe to get that bad, that's not a 1-2 miles worth of run time failure. It's been chewing that lobe up for a long long time. Slap a new camshaft in there, new lifters and keep running it.

 

But if you have time and don't mind the truck being down, then repair what you got and then some. Send it out to be cleaned up, install new camshaft bearings and new rod/main bearings. That's usually cheaper than a complete long block.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I think Cam's approach is pretty on with this.  New cam and lifters and run it, or pull it for cleaning, new bearings (cam, main and rods), cam and lifters.

 

The Gen 5 LT camshafts we've changed at work, only one so far needed camshaft bearings.  And the lobes on these looked worse than how yours does.  Far more pitting/delamination and nowhere near 240k miles.  More like 50-100k.  Cop Tahoe smoked a non AFM cylinder lobe at 78k.  

Edited by newdude
  • Like 1
Posted

Okay gotcha, truck still had good oil pressure so i will try not to look at the cam bearings! 😆 I will be going that route and doing cam/lifters/pushrods and do a crankcase oil flush. I have heard bad stories about remanufactured lifters being lower quality, any brand would you suggest?

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Left a rag in intake runner, got sucked in and probably bent valves and kissed the piston... Thats what I get for being an idiot.

 

 

 

20230418_201337.jpg

Edited by Waffeey
An idiot

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • "Increase"?   You want to "increase" your turning radius?     What is your truck?  What kind of cab and bed do you have currently?  Is it stock?  Modified?  Lifted?  
    • OP's quote is parts and labor.  Not just parts.     The # you found isn't the right one.  But besides that, the right # is the same price within a couple bucks.  $5802.01.    Now, factor in labor and fluids.  Book time is 17.1 hours for a Colorado 8 speed.  At $200/hr for a dealer average rate, its $3420 just in labor.  We are already at $9222.  Fluid and other necessary items, there's your $400-500 more.      Also.  Your "discounted" transmission.  Which is 99% likely quoted off of GM Parts Direct as that's the MSRP I found on their site.    You failed to note the $597 in shipping charges.  So we are right back almost to MSRP.  $5794.  Oh.  AND, you better have the $4000 for the core charge which you'd have to pay and get refunded, AND you gotta pay to SHIP THE CORE BACK.    So now you'd have paid MORE to buy that one online yourself, even after you get your core refunded.  
    • I would like to know if I can increase my 2025 Silverado 2500 HD
    • Length/amount of data capture will be important to consider, sifting through 5 minutes of a data log can be enormous when it is stored in milliseconds. Being able to find the 'event' let alone decipher it.   Presumably the driver would notice something and hit a button to capture the 'window' of data. That window has to be large enough for the operator to recognize the event and react accordingly.    The data has to be able to be retrieved easily.   The data has to be able to be understood. Which is the biggest challenge, dealer techs won't even know what most of it is and would likely not even look at it if an owner brought it to them. Meaning the owner, the least educated/qualified, trying to understand it.    How will the data be presented? Could specific PIDs be selected and a timelapse graph be watched? How will a specific value be noted as abnormal? Additionally, a good data logger would be able to 'learn' normal values for a specific vehicle and flag abnormalities automatically. It could in theory watch parameters degrade over time and suggest maintenance as needed. (If the MAF reading begins tapering off for a given set of other readings - MAP, throttle position, Ambient, etc.. a flag to check air filter.) With the amount of data available, a device (really the vehicle rather than an additional accessory) should be able to do more than issue a DTC. It should be able to run the full diagnostic suite automatically and present a solution rather than a code. (It's not the 90's anymore). The technology is available for the vehicle to not just say "P0087", it should know low fuel pressure, check other PIDs to narrow down the problem itself, and determine if it is a lift pump, high pressure pump, regulator, leak in the fuel line, clogged filter, etc. Even if it can't narrow it down, it should be able to guide the user to the likely problems.   This would be a major problem for dealer service departments, which are the manufacturers customers it is in their collective best interest to NOT have this available to the consumer.   Further, if the owner is going to be the primary consumer of the data, it's got to be at a consumer price point vs. dealer only specialty tool price.   This group is more 'involved' in their vehicle than general public/consumer and will have knowledge, experience, needs and desires that are quite different from the market at large.   
    • I put the prof up. If you read what I posted. You can see that housing, cars and income are in line with the era we were talking about. It’s harder in some places easier in others. Let’s agree to disagree and put this back on track, OK? We both are pretty stubborn and hard headed. But I bring receipts. If you wish I will not respond to you in the future. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...