Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Of course they are cheaply made at this price point but that doesn't mean they are bad headers.


Those headers do the same thing as the kooks headers than cost well over $1,000. Some just hate slip fits and making them work sometimes.

Posted (edited)

What's the advantage of long tube headers VS standard length; or is he referring to standard length VS Short Tube models? I read the ad, seems like a killer price for stainless steel! No provision for oxygen sensors, not legal for street use.

Edited by dna9656
Posted
8 minutes ago, dna9656 said:

What's the advantage of long tube headers VS standard length; or is he referring to standard length VS Short Tube models? I read the ad, seems like a killer price for stainless steel! No provision for oxygen sensors, not legal for street use.

 

Tube length and size determine the 'shape' of the torque curve and rpm they are most effective at. For street systems it more a matter of more flow period, aka reduced back pressure. Tunned lengths are canceled by cats and mufflers. More of an open exhaust using a  collector thing. 

 

Bungs for O2 sensors can be added easy enough. Some banded and some weld in. 

Posted

It has 3 o2 sensor spots, did you look at the pictures?

 

You can run 2 upstream sensors and a wideband in the drivers side y-pipe section. Or you can weld in cats with 2 more o2 sensors. Nothing is technically street legal without CARB certs, that has never stopped us from modding our vehicles.

  • Like 1
Posted

I wonder if the EPA wouldn't balk at something like an O2 sensor being added by the user VS the manufacturer.

Posted (edited)

Guess I missed that. I did read the description before looking at the pic much, I assumed there were no provisions for O 2 sensors after reading the disclaimer at the bottom. I assumed the only reason the EPA would object was no O2 sensors.

Edited by dna9656
Posted

It's hard for the EPA to object because someone could put a carburetor on their LS engine that is installed in a classic car that never had them.

 

Currently the only thing people that sells these have is saying offroad use only. We know and the EPA knows that that doesn't stop people from putting them on their daily drivers.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

You can tax it out of existence. 

You can price it out of existence. 

You can legislate it out of existence. 

You can remove it from existence via fatal flaw.

You can design obsolescence to drive it to extinction. 

You can refuse to support you hard and software to extinction.

 

IMHO GM is about die by its own hand. :idiot:

 

 Car Brands with the Most (and Fewest) Recalls | Reader's Digest (rd.com)

 

Note who is at the top of the list for MOST? :crackup:

 

I've had more recalls on my last 3 GM's that all other makes combine over a lifetime of ownership. Every one of them avoidable at the design stage of production. I'm convinced GM has no real future. They've been killing it for decades on Mark at a time, one model at a time. 

 

This is where the aftermarket makes it bread and butter. It supports what the OEM's don't or won't and finds workarounds for attempts of others to force purchase of the new and extinction of the former. They are why an antique and special interest vehicle markets even exist. 

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, Damian Nieto said:

What about the size 1 3/4 vs 1 7/8?

 

There are formulas for all this but in general terms the diameter is matched to the cylinder volume. Bigger cylinders get bigger tubes. There are even situations where one might consider a stepped tube. 

 

What people loose on this topic is that a header is tuned to a very narrow rpm band. Less than 500 rpm wide. On the street this is mute where you cruise at 1500 but tow perhaps at 4000. But backpressure reduction is the major goal on the street. 

 

 

Edited by Grumpy Bear
additional content
Posted

On a stock engine you won't notice a difference between tube sizes, it's not flowing enough exhaust to matter. If you added a bigger camshaft, better flowing heads and all that then the larger tubes would be better and if you did forced induction. You want all the flow then.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,947
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Sothpaw27
    Newest Member
    Sothpaw27
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 0 Anonymous, 561 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have a `25, 1500 that auto sets on incline. Never knew that at first. I have the electronic shifter. Just think if it didn`t do that? Unlike a mechanical shift that you can muscle out of park, how would you get this thing out? That would be a problem.   What I found out later is, I don`t have to push the button to release. Just put it in gear.   Setting parameters? Don`t know if it`s possible.
    • 2023 GMC 3500 HD, SLE, 6.6L Gas, 4x4, 6 Spd Options:  SLE Convenience Package; Driver Alert Package 1; Spray on Bedliner; X31 Off Road Package; TRAILERING MIRRORS, HEATED POWER -ADJUSTABLE, AUTO DIMMING, WITH TURN INDICATORS WHEELHOUSE LINERS, REAR INC. REAR AXLE - 3.73 RATIO INC. GVWR, 11,350 LBS. (5148 KG) INC. FRONT AND REAR PARK ASSIST, INC. ULTRASONIC     I have been launching my new boat and noticed some things related to the parking brake.. I usually set the parking brake (habit) when on flat ground for typical driving.    When backed down on the launch ramp to launch the boat and I place gear selector into Park, the parking brake activates automatically. My second nature is to set parking brake manually and noticed I was turing the parking brake off.  The parking brake appears to be setting itself automatically.   I looked all over my owner's manual and only found references to being on an incline and manually setting parking brake, or at times parking brake will be auto engaged, but nothing specific to my situation.    When is the parking brake automatically engaged?  Under what specific circumstances?  Can the auto set parameters be changed?     I like the auto set feature.  It would be nice if always engaged when shifted into Park and released when shifted out of Park (like my wifes 2025 RAV4).   Thanks!    
    • www.enginelabs.com/news/what-i-learned-today-bearing-clearances-vs-oil-viscosities/     www.enginelabs.com/news/oil-viscosity-can-the-numbers-be-misleading/ The Big Lie… Coming full circle to the reason Lake discusses the Porsche engines in particular. Based on the 2000 samples in the SPEEDiagnostix database, increasing the oil viscosity in these engines, even those run on the track, showed no significant difference in results.   The smoking gun was in the oil chemistry. That is where the data shows higher instances of more wear. Molybdenum was the key; the higher the amount, the less the wear. Speed postulates that higher viscosity oils have more thickeners to artificially inflate their viscosity numbers. These thickeners lose viscosity under shear, and the result is that not all oils of the same viscosity have the same shear stability.   Having enough viscosity is the most important characteristic, but according to Speed, once that required viscosity level is reached, additive chemistry matters more than additional viscosity. Speed also states, oil pressure problems on the racetrack aren’t a viscosity problem; it’s an oiling system problem. Running a thicker oil is just a band-aid for an underlying oiling system problem.
    • Can it still be Assembled II?   Viscosity on the decline by various means. Heat on the rise making that worse. Engine RPM in the tank. Smaller motors with more boost trying to emulate an electric motor. Full torque, zero rpm. Then we will triple the OCI. Argh.    But wait....there is more. LSPI has pushed a shift from Ca to Mg and as that cost more PLUS the run to lower sulfur compounds the TBN is moving in the wrong direction for the increased OCI's demanded.    That not being enough to placate a demand for a parameter they can't measure the other sulfur bearing compounds are also under attack. That would be zinc and phosphorus sulfonate compounds. To some degree those are being replaced with boron esters and others, i.e. titanium ect. All of which have shorter service lives. And there there is the "Secrete Sauce" marketing for AW adds that 'Can't be detected by UOA's" but trust me because I (the blenders) never ever lie.    Spoiler alert; ALL additives are sacrificial! Smaller amounts of the old blended with less robust versions of the new do not equal longer service lives. So what are the blenders recommending? Wait for it.......   MOVING THE GOAL POSTS! OMG      Let's declare the long standing TAN/TBN crossover irrelevant and tell people that soot is a great 'graphite' based lubricant which can aid tribo films. Wait, what? Let's declare that the standards used for oxidation and nitration were to conservative and can be expanded. Let's tell them that because GDI fuel dilution, although being a VISCOSITY KILLER and an acid generator is actually okay because we have better base oils that limit viscosity failure limits. (Said knowing this is measured in fractions of a centipoise and in bases not commonly used in shelf oils)   Lying from the heart is not just the new normal but we have a public, a very young public, that is so ignorant of the facts and so sure of their "RESEARCH" into AI driven models base in regurgitated  instead of scientific research based unvarnished, peer reviewed FACTS that the incoming guard is loosing their grip on reality and the OEM's are tickled pink while the blends bend the knee.    You have an ever limited set of tools to work with. And sooner or later those will be taken from you as the API and the EPA strangle the last remaining fluids from the system. What you have left is your wits. If you care to use them.    At some point in the very near future it will not longer be possible to do "What is best for the machine", and be replaced with "The best you have access too". You WILL be rewarded with half the life and twice the cost. That isn't that hard to predict.         
    • I trust you saw the other comment where he knew what he was talking about !. Yes, these darned newer vehicles with all their so smart they are stupid technology, goes and drains the battery down. As you might see my other comment, I installed a Noco 5 battery tender under the hood and at this point still have the cord routed so I have to lift the hood and then plug it in but am typically parked in a garage or a shed so its not risking the engine hood in the wind. That way I am assured or hopefully so of not finding I have a battery drawn down and can't even start the truck and that also damages the battery to draw it down too far. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...