Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 minutes ago, dumbmechanic said:

Hmmm, I thought the change in turbo (10- blade vs. 11-blade) and some of the other things Gale mentioned would have made the gen2 L5P have a higher ceiling...

The turbo upgrades raised the power level, not the ceiling. The ceiling is set by thermal and emissions limits. 

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, TurboTime said:

The turbo upgrades raised the power level, not the ceiling. The ceiling is set by thermal and emissions limits. 

What are the ceiling parameters? 

Are those Banks or GMs?

  • Like 1
Posted
23 minutes ago, asilverblazer said:

What are the ceiling parameters? 

Are those Banks or GMs?

GM's ceiling. In other words, there are thermal limits like EGT, IAT, Mass Air Flow, etc, that GM doesn't allow you to exceed. The ECM fights back. Our job is to identify those limits through a few weeks of dyno tests, then back down Derringer's added power until everything is happy and repeatable. 

  • Like 2
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Posted
3 hours ago, Knottyboyz said:

Still waiting, truck pulling season is coming soon! Are we getting any closer?


@Knottyboyz Steve with Banks here. Yes, we’re getting close. Beta testing is progressing well, and based on feedback from our engineering team, we’re anticipating another 4–6 weeks of testing before moving into production. Please note that we do not have horsepower figures or pricing available at this time. Attached are screenshots featuring feedback from a few of our Banks Test Pilots on the 2024+ L5P Duramax Derringer, shared in our Duramax Facebook group.

Link to the group 👉 https://www.facebook.com/groups/derringerl5powners

 

image (26).png

image (27).png

Posted

Thanks Steve for the update!
 

Curiously will the intake and exhaust share the same roll out dates as the Derringer or will it be a phased roll out? 
 

Thanks!

 

 

 

Posted
Just now, davidm767 said:

Thanks Steve for the update!
 

Curiously will the intake and exhaust share the same roll out dates as the Derringer or will it be a phased roll out? 
 

Thanks!

 

 

 

@davidm767 I have updates for the intake and exhaust as well. The Ram-Air intake is in its beta-test phase with about a dozen Test Pilots. See below. Currently, we are ensuring that the new mass airflow intercept module and tubing we have developed function correctly. Please expect it around the same time as the Derringer.

The Monster Exhaust has been pushed back by about six months. We have all of the tubing sorted; what is needed is a piece of electronics to help intercept the computer so the truck does not freak out. The truck is sensitive to any changes in change with exhaust even after the DPF.The development time for materials and programming is going to take us a moment. We have tried tirelessly for the last few months to try and make the exhaust work by itself. Unfortunately, it will not work without electronic intervention.

 

473383979_620098337276714_1410316099108440708_n.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 4/17/2025 at 7:14 PM, guaposteve said:


@Knottyboyz Steve with Banks here. Yes, we’re getting close. Beta testing is progressing well, and based on feedback from our engineering team, we’re anticipating another 4–6 weeks of testing before moving into production. Please note that we do not have horsepower figures or pricing available at this time. Attached are screenshots featuring feedback from a few of our Banks Test Pilots on the 2024+ L5P Duramax Derringer, shared in our Duramax Facebook group.

Link to the group 👉 https://www.facebook.com/groups/derringerl5powners

 

image (26).png

image (27).png

Steve, I already bought the data idash pro, will there be a version of the derringer without the gauge? Looks like on the 23 it only comes with the gauge. 

Posted

 

3 hours ago, AJCDuramax said:

Steve, I already bought the data idash pro, will there be a version of the derringer without the gauge? Looks like on the 23 it only comes with the gauge. 



The Derringer for the 2024+ L5p, when offered, will have a kit option for those who already have an existing iDash Pro just like other Derringer kits. 


 

  • Like 1
  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 6/20/2025 at 9:17 PM, davidm767 said:

It’s finally out! Both the Derringer and the Ram-Air are available to purchase!

Yes, finally! It is important to note the Ram-Air intake will NOT work for the 2025 model years, only the 2024. GM added a PCV sensor for the '25 model year. It has to do with ever-tightening emissions. The forthcoming Ram-Air Intake for the '25 will include both the Banks Air Mass Control Module which plugs into the MAF sensor, and a PCV sensor module. These modules are what allows us to flow greater air mass. Meanwhile, all other intake brands are stuck with stock airflow. Stay tuned for a release date.


image.thumb.png.cadc606b3c69b6a0a52ca1e57c8e97c4.png
 
  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

Got my intake and loving it! Any update on the exhaust or when the derringer will be CARB compliant?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,978 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
    • Paid $2.72 for E85 today.
    • Welcome back! No, it definitely doesn't pass the sniff test. Even "ceasefire" needs an alternative definition these days.    $5.29 at Kroger today
    • That makes sense, and I think you are describing the real product problem. Capturing data is the easy part. If the owner or technician has to manually dig through five minutes of millisecond-level logs, the product has already failed. The device would be at the ECM harness, not at the OBD port, so I agree that data retrieval and event marking need to be thought through carefully. The way I am thinking about the architecture is: The recorder itself should not depend on a phone, app, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, or cloud connection to capture the event. It should always keep a local rolling buffer and lock the event locally. A button, phone app, or small cabin device would only act as an event marker. If the driver feels a stumble and presses the button 10–30 seconds later, the pre-buffer has to already contain the useful data. For data retrieval, the practical options would be a sealed service USB lead, Wi-Fi download, or a phone/cabin companion device. I would not expect the owner to remove the ECM-side module or work with raw files directly. The cloud or AI side would be for interpretation, not for capturing the event. The truck may have no connection when the issue happens, so the evidence has to be saved locally first. After that, cloud processing could help decode the data, compare it against baselines, and generate a readable report. For the first version, I would keep the automatic triggers conservative and objective: driver event marker bus-off error passive voltage drop / brownout device reset FIFO or queue overflow a normally periodic message disappearing side-to-side communication mismatch, if the topology supports that For “learning normal,” I agree with your point, but I would not want to overclaim it as automatic root-cause diagnosis at first. A realistic first step would be learned baseline comparison for that specific vehicle and operating condition. For example, a value would only be compared against similar conditions: RPM range load / MAP throttle position gear / vehicle speed coolant and oil temperature battery voltage AFM/DFM state, if decoded and validated Then the report could flag things like: this periodic message disappeared compared with its normal timing this value deviated from this vehicle’s normal range under similar conditions the same abnormal pattern repeated after the same type of event the anomaly occurred together with voltage, oil-pressure, misfire, or communication changes But I would still call that “abnormal pattern detected,” not “replace this part,” unless there is enough validated repair data behind it. So the intended product would not be “here is a huge log.” It would need to be an event package: what triggered the capture how much pre/post data was preserved what changed before and after the event whether the device itself reset, overflowed, or saw a bus error selected graphs around the event raw data only as supporting evidence From your perspective, what would make this kind of report useful instead of just another datalog? For example: What are the top 5 parameters or events you would want highlighted first? Would you trust a learned baseline for that specific vehicle, or would you prefer fixed thresholds? How much false-positive flagging would be acceptable before you stopped looking at the reports? What would a one-page report need to show for an independent shop to take it seriously? For misfire, AFM/DFM, oil pressure, or U-code complaints, what would you want the tool to flag automatically?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...