Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Any one have this issue with def range low popping up in cluster with mileage range calc but your def indicator lights show that it’s full?


Also says on App too that it’s range is low?

pic below.

 

IMG_5791.png

IMG_5793.jpeg

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On 7/1/2023 at 3:30 PM, Chris Gardner said:

Any one have this issue with def range low popping up in cluster with mileage range calc but your def indicator lights show that it’s full?


Also says on App too that it’s range is low?

pic below.

 

IMG_5791.png

IMG_5793.jpeg

This is certainly not what we like to hear, Chris Gardner.  Please know, customer satisfaction is extremely important to us. Our team would be more than happy to take a closer look into the concerns with the DEF not showing the correct levels on your truck. To do so, please send an email to [email protected] with ATTN: Chris Gardner/GM Trucks in the subject line.

Please include your contact information, VIN, a brief description of your concern, and the name of your preferred dealership. We look forward to hearing from you. To learn more about GM’s Privacy Policy, please visit https://www.gm.com/privacy-statement.html. The information you provide may be monitored and recorded and is subject to the GM Privacy Statement.
 
Privacy Statement | General Motors
Your privacy is important to General Motors. This Privacy Statement addresses the personal information GM collects and how GM handles that personal information.
www.gm.com
 

Posted

On my '23, myGMC seems to always report the DEF level information as 'unavailable'. 

 

I have noticed that in truck DEF level gauges sometimes are slow to change after a refill. (not just on this '23)

 

 

 

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

New '23 GMC AT4 with 3.0 Diesel...  I have the same issue with a full Def tank, but an alert "DEF Range Low" in the App.  At 1219 total miles on the truck, I had to fill the def tank (DIC said 198 miles remaining).  I have driven another 500 miles (total 1721 miles) and am down 1/3 DEF tank already.  My dealer says this is normal, but I think this is quite excessive.

Posted
59 minutes ago, BCelina said:

New '23 GMC AT4 with 3.0 Diesel...  I have the same issue with a full Def tank, but an alert "DEF Range Low" in the App.  At 1219 total miles on the truck, I had to fill the def tank (DIC said 198 miles remaining).  I have driven another 500 miles (total 1721 miles) and am down 1/3 DEF tank already.  My dealer says this is normal, but I think this is quite excessive.

What level does the info page in the truck say?

 

 

Posted

The current def level is about 2/3 full.  But there is an alert on the GMC app "DEF Range Low".  There is no alert on the Drivers Information Center (DIC) about DEF however, I read that the DIC only displays low range alerts at 1000 & 300 miles to empty.  So, I am interpreting with 2/3 full DEF tank, I am within 1000 and 300 miles on DEF range.

Posted

I'd be ignoring the phone app and going by what the truck is indicating. 

Mine phone app always indicates def info unavailable -- but I've notice the other info is not always fully up to date. 

 

 

What are you doing with the truck?

What type of fuel mpg are you getting when you check it at fill ups? 

DEF usage should be about 2% of fuel usage. 

 

 

Because def usage is so low compared to fuel usage, a small difference in measuring def added (was it filled the same both times) can make a big difference in calculated DEF mileage.

For this reason I run the def tank down to empty or vary close and use a bulk pump to ensure I can get the tank completely filled without having to deal with a jug with some leftover in it. 

 

I also don't believe the DEF page is accurate enough to use for calculating the DEF mileage. 

Each segment does not indicate the same amount of fluid.

When viewing the page, is the segment above the current one 'just turned off' or is the current segment just about to turn off? 

 

 

Fill, record odometer, drive for 1000's of miles, refill and accurately measure def added -- hand calculate mileage.

 

For comparison, my LZO fuel consumption is running about 28 usmpg with my usage. (so not high speed, not towing and little elevation change)

Truck has about 5500 miles and I have not added def since taking delivery.

 

Idash and truck 'def level info page' agree that the truck has about 1/3 tank of DEF left.

I'm expecting it have similar overall consumption as my LM2 --  approx 1200 miles per def gallon.

 

 

 

Posted

DEF page detail taken from 2023 3.0 manual (the 6.6 has a larger tank)

image.thumb.png.bd393c1a5cbd16deade1ac4525e4462b.png

 

The 2023 LZO tank holds 5.4 gallons, so when like the last line (when it will take 4 gallons) it still has 1.4 gallons in tank.

Daily driving that will be +/-1500 miles til empty on mine.  (And then the 500 miles to speed restriction begin)

I'll need fuel twice to drive 1500 miles -- and where there is fuel there is def

(ya, maybe extremely isolate areas there may be fuel and no def, but if I'm going there then part of my preparation is filling the def tank)

 

 

Lack of accuracy example:

 

Drove 2000 miles since DEF tank was completely filled.

Decide to check the DEF page. (intentionally not calling it a gauge)

DEF page is showing top 4 segments off.  

But -- perhaps the 4th segment just went off, or maybe the 5th segment is about to go off -- so somewhere around 1.5 to 2 to 2.5 gallons can be added. 

 

2000 miles / 2.5 gal --- 800 miles per gallon

2000 miles / 2 gal --- 1000 miles per gallon

2000 miles / 1.5 gal ---- 1333 miles per gallon 

 

So, using just the def page, we really have no idea about the def usage.  (which is why I don't call it a gauge...)

1333 is way way more than 800....

 

 

Otoh, I'm not sure all this really matters.

If not trying do detailed tracking of DEF mileage just wait for the 1000 mile warning and dump in a 2.5 gallon jug.  

I'm doing it for '****** and giggles'.

 

 

 

 

 

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

I have this same 

On 7/1/2023 at 3:30 PM, Chris Gardner said:

Any one have this issue with def range low popping up in cluster with mileage range calc but your def indicator lights show that it’s full?


Also says on App too that it’s range is low?

pic below.

 

IMG_5791.png

IMG_5793.jpeg

 

 

I'm having this same exact issue with my 2023 AT4 (3.0L).  I have around 500miles on the truck and my DEF indicator in the truck is only down one line from full.  However, my MyGMC app has been showing DEF Range Low since a week after I got the vehicle.  Everything else in the app seems to be working fine...sometimes my PSI might be off by 1 or 2, but no biggie. GM tells me the DEF Range Low issue is an OnStar issue since only my app is giving me false info.  OnStar has elevated my complaint like 5 times now and gone through diagnostics over the phone with me like 10x.  I don't know if its an app issue or if there is something within the truck that isn't feeding correct info to the app, specifically the DEF Range.

 

I want to clarify that I don't get any warnings or popups in my vehicle cluster or dashboard...the ONLY issue is the app reporting DEF Range Low.

Edited by Kicker0927
Posted
7 hours ago, Kicker0927 said:

I have this same 

 

 

I'm having this same exact issue with my 2023 AT4 (3.0L).  I have around 500miles on the truck and my DEF indicator in the truck is only down one line from full.  However, my MyGMC app has been showing DEF Range Low since a week after I got the vehicle.  Everything else in the app seems to be working fine...sometimes my PSI might be off by 1 or 2, but no biggie. GM tells me the DEF Range Low issue is an OnStar issue since only my app is giving me false info.  OnStar has elevated my complaint like 5 times now and gone through diagnostics over the phone with me like 10x.  I don't know if its an app issue or if there is something within the truck that isn't feeding correct info to the app, specifically the DEF Range.

 

I want to clarify that I don't get any warnings or popups in my vehicle cluster or dashboard...the ONLY issue is the app reporting DEF Range Low.

 

The DEF report on the app has never worked on my 2023.

The app always says def info is 'unavailable' or something like that. (doesn't say def low) 

 

The DEF level page on the DIC does work. 

It gave the '1000 miles to def empty' warning the other day.

iDash said the tank was at about 20-25%.

DIC def level indicator has the tiny segment and the first full size segment active, teh others off. 

Today all segments on the DIC indicator are off, iDash says between 15 and 20%.

 

Truck ('23 LZO) has about 7200 miles on it.  I haven't added any DEF yet. 

Plan to fill at a metered bulk pump in the next day or two. 

 

Was planning to not fill until it gave the 'DEF empty' and '500 miles to speed limit' warnings, but that's not gonna work out this time.

 

 

  • 2 months later...
Posted

redwngr, Did you ever find an answer to your DEF issues?  I just posted the thread about mine.  I have just about the same mileage as you did when you posted your thread. 

Posted
56 minutes ago, Loadmaster said:

redwngr, Did you ever find an answer to your DEF issues?  I just posted the thread about mine.  I have just about the same mileage as you did when you posted your thread. 

I don't think I have a DEF  'issue', I have a myGMC phone app issue -- and it's always had issues in Canada.

 

Everything in the truck is still working fine.

The app on the phone still says DEF information unavailable.  (also doesn't give mpg info for my truck, buys does for her Acadia....). 

 

I ended up not waiting til it gave the 'empty now' messages. 

Def range was at 298 miles, all bars on def level indicator were 'off', iDash said level was 11%.

 

Filled with bulk in semi lanes at a FlyingJ.

C$25.43, 18.71L  -- so about US$18.60 / 4.94 usgal (so just under 2 jugs) 

 

image.png.dd0a46fc65552ae7ceef064417dea940.png

 

I was expecting the DEF mileage to be 1200 - 1300.

We'll see if it repeats on the next fill.

 

 

 

 

 

Posted

I appreciate your reply.  I have the same issue as you and many others.  I don't know if it is the app, or the way data is given from the vehicle.  It would be nice if GM would fix it, but I won't hold my breath.

 

My bigger issue is the wrong reporting DEF level.  Dealership did a reset and data dump.  This seems to have corrected the panel warnings, but the DEF level still shows less than what is really in the tank.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Can it still be Assembled I?    Stribeck says that we need a certain amount of viscosity under conditions of load and velocity to prevent two surfaces of a know roughness from tearing each other asunder. And we have marketing trying to tell the masses that those two surfaced require less of that commodity due to more exact limits being placed on the same old clearances. We also know that there are limits to how hard something can before it becomes to brittle to be viable and to smooth to 'wet' the surface and that both of those conditions have been known and met since about the Second World War.    That viscosity value shook out at 10 centistokes at 212 F just under a hundred years ago.  Give this a look: [Anton Parr]     What is advertised is the Kinematic viscosity (mm2/s) or that which has been density adjusted but the value we are after is the dynamic viscosity (mPa.s) or true viscosity. You can see that this number is dependent on density thus base stock and temperature. You can also see that an SAE 30 doesn't reach that value in this example. However an SAE 30 that is at the upper end of the SAE 30 range; 12.5 cSt (mm2/s), might. 12.5 * .83 = 10.375 (mm2/s). If you could find an SAE 30 at the upper end these days.   Then there is the complication of viscosity modifiers or VII or VM, whatever you wish to call them. Polymers added to very thin base oils, perhaps 3 to 6 cP oils, that will meet the SAE *W30 spec at 'tested' shear rates and 100 C/212F  target temperature. So a polymer fortified base that is a fraction of the 10 cP requirement Stribeck insist upon.   This could be all well and good if those polymers didn't have two very problematic 'features'. They shear or loose viscosity both 1.) permanently and 2.) temporality. And they do both omitted in the advertised data with the distinct  purpose of deceiving the consumer of the actual operating state of the fluid. I've shown the example of Warren Oils COSTCO 10.91 cSt 5W30 formuation several times where the 100 C HTHS value is 6.9 cP!! That's the temporary shear down and with and SSI or shear stability index of 9.4 cSt. Note the intentional deception in using mixed units?    After a short while that 9.4 cSt oil has a viscosity corrected dynamic value of 7.8 cP. But as the SSI is still within the range of an SAE *W30 whose lower value is 9.3 cSt.    This allows them to continue to call this SAE 16 weight oil a 30 weight, the cake, and still meet the API requirements for fuel efficiency IMPROVEMENT mandated by the EPA. The eating of the cake. By the time you've worn out your motor doing the responsible thing by adhering to the warranty requirements, (the stick), you get deprived of the carrot, wear control. So sad, to bad.   So what can be done? Do I need actually say? [Anton Parr]       Even this must be monitored if the oil is on the low side and the VII an organic or you opt for a 0W40 with an even lighter base oil and more / higher MW VII. (Note the lower density of the 40 weight versus the SAE 30 mono-weight?)    There is another workaround. Temperature. An SAE *W30 run at a bulk temperature of between 180 and 195 F.    Being the belt and suspenders sort I am I do both. Run it cook and run it heavy.    In Part II I'll work the AW package. 
    • So, do I go elbow-deep on this thing or list it for sale and play dumb? Seems to "runs good."   I'm about $1200 away from having: -a rebuilt injector ($300) -a new cat ($250) -a new cat back exhaust (OE style) ($300) -a new AC compressor ($200) -AC refrigerant charge ($150)   In theory, this should rectify the obvious detracting issues from its value and operability. Cold AC with a non-squeaking AC pulley both sounds and feels good. An exhaust that isn't cut/hacked in 17 different places and doesn't vibrate on a crossmember would make it sound and feel less janky. A working cat would help the stink, and will save the earth, but *if and only if* the fuel system is working properly, which would also address the intermittent "rich" CEL.   Heard a good one... CEL for "Rich condition" means you haven't spent enough money on the truck lately, and it's letting you know.   Rebuilding the injector would seem to be the most important part. Replacing the cat would be secondary. I don't think mine is plugged or overly restricted, but it might be a little restricted? I have no good way to tell other than seat of the pants feel. I hate the smell.   The current theory is I have a rich idle problem: A bad fuel pressure regulator, or a leaking injector(s) being the highest probabilities. I already replaced the FPR but that doesn't mean its replacement isn't also bad. It was a new part from Dorman, but the packaging looked like it had been sitting on a shelf for 20 years.   This is the (single) upstream O2 sensor shown at idle. I'm getting a lot of "rich" it seems. Sometimes it stays high like that and doesn't drop down. That makes me think it's processing injector leaks or a partially stuck open injector.     Other times it looks like this. Nice oscillations between rich and lean, which is what I think it should be. Under load and at speed, the oscillations are nice and tight and uniform looking, high and low.     Fuel trims suggest the PCM is compensating pretty hard at idle to pull fuel out. But it's not enough to trip a CEL. Something about slowing to a stop: brake vaccum booster, EGR, or the EVAP purge is delayed, or there's pooled fuel in the intake again that's draining into a cylinder is enough to set the CEL. Of course, in two days of driving, it hasn't set. I was hoping to actually look at the freeze-frame data when it sets. IAT is high because it's idling on an 83 degree day here.  
    • Have considered installing a DC to DC charger in your camper to replace your isolator?  
    • Common failure.  You need to replace the fuel door housing.   The painted cover transfers over to the new housing.  To remove the old one there is 4 spots where you poke the plastic to release it.  
    • No such thing as regenerative braking on a pure ICE vehicle.     Regenerative braking is the re-capture of energy from electric motors and stores it in the battery pack.  So hybrids, PHEV and EVs have regenerative braking.     What you are seeing is the charging system changing modes is all.  Its likely entering charge mode for some sort of reason is all.  All of the charging modes will be listed below.   As for L10 vs D.  L10 turns off automatic grade braking.  L10 puts you in control of grade downshifts where in D it will automatically do it based on brake pedal position and other factors.  Otherwise L10 and D drive exactly the same aside from that one aspect.    Battery Sulfation Mode The BCM will enter this mode when the interpreted Generator output voltage is less than 13.2 V for 45 minutes. When this condition exists the BCM will enter Charge Mode for 2–3 minutes. The BCM will then determine which mode to enter depending on voltage requirements.   Charge Mode The BCM will enter Charge Mode when ever one of the following conditions are met:   Windshield wipers are ON for more than 3 s. Climate Control Voltage Boost Mode Request is true, as sensed by the HVAC control module via serial data. High speed cooling fan, rear defogger, and HVAC high speed blower operation can cause the BCM to enter the Charge Mode. The estimated battery temperature is less than 0°C (32°F). Battery State of Charge is less than 80%. Vehicle speed is greater than 145 km/h (90 mph) A current sensor malfunction exists. System voltage is determined to be below 12.56 V When any one of these conditions is met, the system will set targeted generator output voltage to a charging voltage between 13.9–15.5 V, depending on the battery state of charge and estimated battery temperature.   Fuel Economy Mode The BCM will enter Fuel Economy Mode when the estimated battery temperature is at least 0°C (32°F) but less than or equal to 80°C (176°F), the calculated battery current is less than 15 A and greater than −8 A, and the battery state-of-charge is greater than or equal to 80%. Its targeted generator output voltage is the open circuit voltage of the battery and can be between 12.5–13.1 V. When fuel economy mode is active, the generator is not charging, only maintaining open circuit battery voltage. The BCM will exit this mode and enter Charge Mode when any of the conditions described above are present.   Headlamp Mode The BCM will enter Headlamp Mode when ever the head lamps are ON (high or low beams). Voltage will be regulated between 13.9–14.5 V.   Start Up Mode When the engine is started the BCM sets a targeted generator output voltage of 14.5 V for 30 s.   Tow/Haul Mode (if applicable) Pressing the Tow/Haul Mode button located on the center stack, the vehicle system voltage is raised and the remote (non-vehicle) battery will be charged. Having the headlamps on will raise the system voltage and if the Tow/Haul button is applied it will not serve any purpose. The voltage is regulated between 13.9-14.5 V.      
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...