Jump to content

3.08 to 3.73 Gear ratio on 2013 Silverado with 35s??

Matt2013LT
 Share

Recommended Posts

Matt2013LT Enthusiast

Matt2013LT

Posted
Posted

I currently have a 2013 Silverado CCSB 5.3 2wd with a 6.5 inch zone lift kit on 2020 Silverado 20 inch RST Wheels mounted on 35 inch trail grapplers! I currently have the crappy factory 3.08 gear ratio. As you can imagine, a truck with 35's with a 3.08 is an absolute dog! Holds gears until 2500 RPM, 6th gear is totally unusable over 60MPH, and 9.5 AVG Fuel Economy. AFM/DOD has been removed from the engine also.

 

When I first bought the truck in July 2021, it was a mostly bone stock 1 owner truck. It had the 17 inch alloys on 265/70r17 Goodyear wranglers on stock suspension. RPM's were relatively low with the 3.08, but of course, mostly stock! Averaging 13.2 MPG

 

I've recently have had to do some long distance driving & the low MPG + price of fuel is costing too much! For anyone that has knowledge on this, do you think it's possible to put a 3.73 gear ratio in with a 6L80E & 35s, and have lower RPM's, or is it best to go for a lower gear ratio like a 4.10+ ?? I'm just trying to get as much fuel efficiency as possible!

 

Any input would be great! Thank you

  • Like 1
diyer2 Senior Enthusiast

diyer2

Posted
Posted

Back to stock tires and get rid if the lift for fuel efficiency. Bigger gears will give more torque but higher rpms. I don't think it will help with fuel efficiency. 

CamGTP Senior Enthusiast

CamGTP

Posted
Posted

Did you ever tune the truck for the new tire size? I would have hoped you did, but that alone wouldn't have really helped much with the mechanical disadvantaged you already had.

 

Going to 3.73's will help a lot, the truck will work less hard to get to the same speed. Ideally with true 35's you'd want 3.90's or 4.10's. But with a 6 speed auto you can get away with less gear, I'd go with 3.73's or 3.90's personally in a 6 speed.

 

Use an RPM calculator to figure out your highway speed cruising rpm. Look up the 6L80e's gear ratios, off memory 6th gear is something like .62 or close to that. Fuel mileage should go up a fair amount because the truck will require less throttle to maintain the same speeds with more mechanical advantage. And get it tuned for the new gear ratio.

  • Like 1
Matt2013LT Enthusiast

Matt2013LT

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 hours ago, diyer2 said:

Back to stock tires and get rid if the lift for fuel efficiency. Bigger gears will give more torque but higher rpms. I don't think it will help with fuel efficiency. 

I totally don't disagree! That would be most optimal for fuel efficiency! But I love a lifted truck! Just my preference though!

Matt2013LT Enthusiast

Matt2013LT

Posted
  • Author
Posted
54 minutes ago, CamGTP said:

Did you ever tune the truck for the new tire size? I would have hoped you did, but that alone wouldn't have really helped much with the mechanical disadvantaged you already had.

 

Going to 3.73's will help a lot, the truck will work less hard to get to the same speed. Ideally with true 35's you'd want 3.90's or 4.10's. But with a 6 speed auto you can get away with less gear, I'd go with 3.73's or 3.90's personally in a 6 speed.

 

Use an RPM calculator to figure out your highway speed cruising rpm. Look up the 6L80e's gear ratios, off memory 6th gear is something like .62 or close to that. Fuel mileage should go up a fair amount because the truck will require less throttle to maintain the same speeds with more mechanical advantage. And get it tuned for the new gear ratio.

 

I honestly never got it tuned! I've only ever got the speedometer calibrated, but I've only driven it 10k miles since August 2022 When the lift + tire's were installed!

 

And you are correct, a gear ratio like a 4.10 would probably be more optimal (that option is still on the table) but even the gearing with 3.73's on 35's is even slightly better than 3.08's on 265/70R17's! The 6L80E has a 1st Gear Ratio of 4.03 and a 6th Gear Ratio of 0.67, so I also agree with you that the 6 spd still wouldn't mind the 3.73! The RPM's would also be quite low with the 3.73 according to the gear charts & calculators I tried!

 

I also will get it tuned at the same time as the new gear ratio. I should've got it tuned to begin with, but I for sure will when the gears go in for maximum efficiency. 

  • Like 1
swathdiver Senior Enthusiast

swathdiver

Posted
Posted
On 10/17/2023 at 7:07 PM, Matt2013LT said:

I currently have a 2013 Silverado CCSB 5.3 2wd with a 6.5 inch zone lift kit on 2020 Silverado 20 inch RST Wheels mounted on 35 inch trail grapplers! I currently have the crappy factory 3.08 gear ratio.

 

...do you think it's possible to put a 3.73 gear ratio in with a 6L80E & 35s, and have lower RPM's, or is it best to go for a lower gear ratio like a 4.10+ ??

 

4.10s will help more around town, 3.73s will be better for the highway.

 

I have a lifted Sierra with the same Zone lift on 35s for ten years now.  It came with 3.73 gears (NHT) which are the equivalent of 3.42s now with the 35 inch tires.  When we get around to it, we're going to regear for 4.10s so that it's gearing will be back to stock with the 35s.

 

She'll get about 13-14 mpg on the highway and averages 10 in the city.  It's a 6.2, tuned with a muffler delete.

 

 

334752147_734359528148641_1467822101475696730_n.jpg

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts

  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1,519 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Coastie05
      Replacing 2.7L on 2021 Silverado with 2023 2.7L

      By Coastie05 · Posted

      I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • MASONV88888888
      Another 6.2L engine failure!

      By MASONV88888888 · Posted

      My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Grumpy Bear
      OCI, not when but why?

      By Grumpy Bear · Posted

      Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • MASONV88888888
      Rattle in the rear!

      By MASONV88888888 · Posted

      Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • Buckwild27
      Gas Prices

      By Buckwild27 · Posted

      I have 2 choices. 

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...