Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Are you trying to decide what to buy? 5.3, 6.2, HD? If you’re like me, you are reading everything the internet has to offer before you buy your next truck.

 

To give you my background, I have owned 3 Duramax 2500HD, 2 5.3 half tons, and now I own a 6.2 GMC AT4 2024. To describe my truck needs, I was comparing towing and fuel milage since ½ of my truck’s use is towing. I am an average guy who does a lot of off roading and fishing – hence towing my atv, jeep, or boat. I used to tow a skid steer with my past 2500 HD Durmax(s) but if you’re not hauling a huge camper, enclosed trailer, or something 9000LB or greater, you don’t need a ¾ or 1 ton.

 

When fuel prices went through the roof and diesels began to have emissions troubles, I decided to go back to the ½ tons. In 2022 I got back into a 5.3. The 5.3 is, in my opinion, the best motor an average truck driver would ever want. Both of my 5.3 (2008) and (2022) were the best engines I have ever owned. No problems, reliable, tow like there is no tomorrow, and with the DFM, the 2022 averaged 15MPG in the city and upper 22MPG on the highway (under 80MPH). Towing, my 5.3 got about 9MPG hauling a jeep on an 18’ flatbed (8K#) and about 11 hauling my 22’ boat (3K#). I live in Florida, so the land is flat, my biggest gas milage killer was traffic. The 5.3 was a 5 star motor and I would highly recommend it. I have 0 bad things to say about a 5.3. The 5.3 was also fast for a pickup truck.

 

I recently wanted a new truck with more bells and whistles. As I get older, the creature comforts are more important to me. Such as AC seats, power fold mirrors, 360 degree cameras, and all the new trailer options. I went to the dealer with the intent of buying another 5.3. However, the dealership had a 2024 GMC AT4 with the 6.2 marked down enough that I had to reconsider my engine option. I immediately went on the internet and began to read and watch YouTube videos. I liked what I saw with the 6.2 and decided to pull the trigger and buy the 6.2.

 

After having the 6.2 I must say that I love it. It is like a super sport or feels like a sport car of trucks. This thing is FAST. I could go on forever about how cool it is to drive such a peppy truck, but trust me, you will not be disappointed in the performance. Without a trailer, the truck gets about 15 city and 22 highway, just like my 5.3 did. I did not lose any fuel milage! If you drive like a grandpa, you can get a little better, but I have a heavy foot. If I really romp it around town, the fuel milage can drop down to 12ish MPG. Yesterday I towed my SxS 50 miles on my 18’ flat bed Big Tex trailer (about 4900#). Driving city and some backroad cruising, I got an average of 13.8MPG which I would have got about 11 in my 5.3. Having only had this 6.2 for a couple weeks, I cannot compare much more towing than that. However, my prediction was accurate that when towing, I can get a tiny bit better fuel milage with the 6.2 as it is not working as much and has more low end torque. But here’s the catch – the 6.2 must run on 91 octane or higher gas per the owner manual. So, mile per dollar, the 5.3 is probably a better choice. I am totally fine paying a little more for fuel to have a 6.2 that will “put you in the seat” when you punch the throttle. But, if you drive like you have sense, the 5.3 is “more fuel efficient.”

 

My overall conclusion: if you are totally focused on good fuel milage and a truck that will do the job, get the 5.3. You will not be disappointed. But, if you want to add a bit more power and fun, get that 6.2. Either way, you will be very happy. If you go to the dealer and test drive both, you will  buy the 6.2 just like I did. Who in the world doesn’t want more power?

 

On a side note, I feel like this 6.2 gas ½ ton accelerates as well as my last Durmax (2015) even when towing. Obviously the ¾ ton holds weight better and has all the advantages of heavier duty running gear. Having owned both, for my needs, I’d choose the 6.2 and save $10-14K, unless I was constantly hauling over 9K#. Also, I hate towing a camper with a ½ ton and would only buy a HD if I was primarily towing a camper. For you camper towing guys, you’ll want airbags on any ½ ton you use to tow. Will my 6.2 tow that camper? heck ya; and so would have my 5.3. But you cannot beat an HD for those 25+’ campers and equipment hauling.

 

This is my experience and I hope it helps you decide.

  • Like 5
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Just towed the same sxs and trailer about 150 miles.  3/4 of the time was highway.  At 70mph I got about 11mpg.  75 I got 9.6.  At 80-85 I got about 7-8 mpg.  I ran each of these on cruise control and flat ground.  Honestly, I feel like the 6.2 should have got better mpg on the highway.  But who really tows at above 75 on a highway? Not me, usually.  The sxs does catch air and have wind drag.  But… plenty of power and preformed like a diesel when passing and hitting the throttle.  Over all- impressed with performance.  Wish fuel mileage was just a bit better, but that’s the trade off.  

Edited by Joey Silverado Sierra Man
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Joey Silverado Sierra Man said:

Just towed the same sxs and trailer about 150 miles.  3/4 of the time was highway.  At 70mph I got about 11mpg.  75 I got 9.6.  At 80-85 I got about 7-8 mpg.  I ran each of these on cruise control and flat ground.  Honestly, I feel like the 6.2 should have got better mpg on the highway.  But who really tows at above 75 on a highway? Not me, usually.  The sxs does catch air and have wind drag.  But… plenty of power and preformed like a diesel when passing and hitting the throttle.  Over all- impressed with performance.  Wish fuel mileage was just a bit better, but that’s the trade off.  

Considering my last new GM was in 2014. The only wrench I would throw in the mix is the E-85 option if it’s still an available option on the 5.3. You would have the best option for power on E-85 for trips you have the reg fuel option. If it’s not available anymore shame on GM. With the towing package I had on my Texas Edition GMC and when using E-85 it would rip. I would still be driving it if not for cylinder deactivation.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

My last 5.3 was in my '11 Tahoe. Traded it in for my '23 6.2 Silverado. 6.2 blows away the 5.3, both power and fuel economy wise. I had zero drivetrain issues with the Tahoe in 150k also. I ran the Range DFM eliminator in it. 

Towing the same boats and cargo trailers mileage was the same, 11 mpg in both of them on the same routes. 

6.2's power is worth the premium fuel price. I alternate half tank fills between 93 and 89 octane gas to cut costs a little. No 91 in my area.

Posted
4 minutes ago, repairman54 said:

My last 5.3 was in my '11 Tahoe. Traded it in for my '23 6.2 Silverado. 6.2 blows away the 5.3, both power and fuel economy wise. I had zero drivetrain issues with the Tahoe in 150k also. I ran the Range DFM eliminator in it. 

Towing the same boats and cargo trailers mileage was the same, 11 mpg in both of them on the same routes. 

6.2's power is worth the premium fuel price. I alternate half tank fills between 93 and 89 octane gas to cut costs a little. No 91 in my area.

That true especially with the 11 5.3. In 2014 there was an improvement in the HP with the 5.3. It’s also tuned for regular gas. Where the 6.2 is tuned for premium gas. GM mostly over came the difference for awhile with the E-85 option on the 5.3. Then there’s the order sheet with options such as a towing package. Gearing can close the gap and help with towing fuel mileage. 

Posted
11 hours ago, milleda31 said:

Why is this posted in the 2019-2025 Chevy Silverado & GMC Sierra Mods category?

Good question.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2,351 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • So I'm in the middle of a DOD AFM delete on my 6.2 L86 Sierra. I had a pick holding the tensioner but after I got the Cam phaser gear off I was cleaning off all the rtv and apparently I didn't have the pick seated far enough in. I bumped it and the tensioner sprang forward.  I think everything is good but I want a second opinion. The top of the tensioner is just a looped piece of plastic that rides in that channel right? There is no spring or anything is there? I got the gear and chain back on and it seems tight and everything looks right. I'm hoping nothing fell out.
    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...