Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'd take the 2021.  Secondly because it has the 5.3l but primarily because it's a pre-refresh truck.  

Posted
45 minutes ago, The Raven said:

I'd take the 2021.  Secondly because it has the 5.3l but primarily because it's a pre-refresh truck.  

What is it about the Pre-Refresh over the Refresh do you like about it?

Posted
9 hours ago, The Raven said:

I'd take the 2021.  Secondly because it has the 5.3l but primarily because it's a pre-refresh truck.  

 

9 hours ago, The Raven said:

I'd take the 2021.  Secondly because it has the 5.3l but primarily because it's a pre-refresh truck.  

I went with a 2024. Love the new interior.  I'm not a big fan of the 19-21 dash and interior.  I really liked my 15 interior and dash.

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, SilveradoRST said:

What is it about the Pre-Refresh over the Refresh do you like about it?

 

Literally everything besides the dash.  

 

I originally went shopping for a 2023 but after finding all the de-contenting they did, combined with the complete un-mod-ability of the new electrical architecture, I can't see how the new dashboard can remotely make up for that.

 

Smaller complaints - I absolutely hate the console shifter, and the new front end makes adding a winch very difficult and unsightly.

 

In 4-ish years when I might be ready to start looking for a replacement for my 21, if someone has found a way to calibrate the refresh trucks for bigger tires and turn off DFM for a reasonable cost, then I might be willing to revisit the question.  But at this time I have zero interest in the refresh trucks.

Edited by The Raven
Posted

Well about 1 week with new truck and I must say really happy with the 2.7. After 18 years of last  trucks with 5.3's it may run a little better then my 2015 did. Over all super happy with truck. Just hope it is as reliable as my 06 and 15 where. 

Posted

One thing I forgot to mention, biggest thing to get used to is the sound of it. Definitely sounds like a 4 cylinder on cold starts and and hard excelerating....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Do you think this width might affect the chalk test with a higher pressure closer to 65psi? I think lowering the pressure makes sense to get the tread to lay flatter
    • I had an alternator fail that was shorted internally in such a direct fashion in addition to the larger gauge cables that it appeared like a VERY dead battery. Granted I think the car did power up, it definitely wouldn't start.   Rodent damage to wiring?
    • ... I don't think he could.
    • Using experience to justify bad advice is lazy and typical of someone incapable of articulating why their advice is prudent.    This immediately sets off the BS alert and the advice that followed certainly qualified.   Asking an idiot for help getting out of dumb situations because he is an expert... at getting himself into dumb situations.   Unless I've been living in an alternate universe - the first thing everyone does when getting into a sticky situation is shift to a higher gear 🤨.   Of course not, the torque multiplication, mechanical advantage and finer control typically afforded by the lower gear is far better suited for this scenario.   There ARE scenarios where a higher gear MIGHT be appropriate determined more by the drivers ability to control EXCESSIVE wheel spin versus applying torque to the ground.
    • I'm not sure I agree with "extreme" low speed, high torque sentiment here with regards to the prescribed use of low range. How about...whenever it's needed?   A 2.72:1 transfer case and whatever differential gears these Silverados have (3.42's, maybe?) aren't producing "extremely" low crawl speeds. Or insanely high torque multiplication. Even with the 1st gear in these newer transmissions. But it does provide mechanical advantage and potentially better control at slower speeds. And with extra weight or towing, I think it adds mechanical sympathy for the truck as well.   Plus, traction control and the other assists generally turn off when you shift into low range. Those aren't needed here, they'll work against you if you need wheel spin. In high range you'll need to figure out how to turn off the various modes those assists provide. Depending on the vehicle, those things don't all automatically turn off or turn completely off.   While I agree that a farmer might have some great practical experience, a recommendation to "always" using one gear isn't very informed advice. If the farmer had said WHY and could explain the physics behind his prescriptive "always" I'd definitely listen. The way he's described here makes it sounds like he could either be uninformed or is telling everyone what worked for him, not necessarily that there could be a more advantageous way about things.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...