Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I saw a post on another forum. The poster had a leak around the shark fin area. Looking at these pics of the new truck. I don't see it or it's well camouflaged. If so it's about time!!

Posted
1 hour ago, 2016 Sierra Owner said:

I saw a post on another forum. The poster had a leak around the shark fin area. Looking at these pics of the new truck. I don't see it or it's well camouflaged. If so it's about time!!

 

 

Nah, just camouflaged really well.  It's definitely on the 2 door that was spotted.  

 

2027 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 WT Regular Cab prototype driving with full camouflage and steel wheels

 

 

You can see it better in this second picture, just above the driver's door window.  

 

2027 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 WT prototype in Regular Cab configuration driving with camouflaged rear and side panels

 

 

If anything it goes to the larger but lower one from the 2025 Tahoe/Suburban:

 

2025 Chevrolet Tahoe in Erie, PA | Dave Hallman Chevrolet

  • Like 1
Posted
11 hours ago, newdude said:

 

 

Nah, just camouflaged really well.  It's definitely on the 2 door that was spotted.  

 

2027 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 WT Regular Cab prototype driving with full camouflage and steel wheels

 

 

You can see it better in this second picture, just above the driver's door window.  

 

2027 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 WT prototype in Regular Cab configuration driving with camouflaged rear and side panels

 

 

If anything it goes to the larger but lower one from the 2025 Tahoe/Suburban:

 

2025 Chevrolet Tahoe in Erie, PA | Dave Hallman Chevrolet

I was looking at these images and didn't see it there.   image.thumb.jpeg.8f767e601f8364059210c61b7864d599.jpeg

Posted
1 hour ago, 2016 Sierra Owner said:

I was looking at these images and didn't see it there.   image.thumb.jpeg.8f767e601f8364059210c61b7864d599.jpeg

 

 

Older spys.  The regular cab is the most recent spy shots taken.  

 

The only other thing, IF they did it, is if they moved everything to inside/part of the CHMSL spoiler on double and crew cabs.  Regular cabs don't use a spoiler on the top of the cab so they'd have to roof mount.

 

IMO, that's a slim IF.  I wouldn't be surprised if they debut with a shark fin on all cabs.  

  • Like 1
Posted

I just want them to finally debut the truck and give more information about the new engines.

Posted (edited)
On 9/12/2025 at 8:46 PM, CamGTP said:

I just want them to finally debut the truck and give more information about the new engines.

Probably won't till the January auto shows start. If it's a 27 model we are still a year off from seeing a good inventory selection on the lots anyway. Plus with the 14 and 19 launch with subsequent recalls. Plus they are talking about new engines! I'd be waiting till the next model year anyway.

Edited by 2016 Sierra Owner
spelling
Posted (edited)

Those are test mules and are not the final production version.  

Edited by Z45
  • 1 month later...
Posted
10 minutes ago, 2016 Sierra Owner said:

And possible water leaks!

So far no leaks for me. Hopefully it stays that way 

Posted (edited)

First of all as part of the development program we typically have small numbers of vehicles that we put out in the hands of people that drive them on a daily basis. That’s a part of our development program that occurs prior to production. We call that a “captured test fleet”. Captured meaning we know where the cars are and we know who the drivers are, and test fleet because the cars aren’t in production yet. We use the versions that we build at the tail end of the development cycle to really put them out there on a daily basis to get better understanding of what’s going on with the vehicles.

GM VP of global program management

 

2027_Chevrolet_Silverado_Photos_04-scaled.jpg

Edited by Z45
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I never understood why people complain about this? What's wrong with the antenna being on the roof? I don't see it as a eyesore, hell I don't even pay attention to it. 

20251121_112518.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted
On 11/23/2025 at 8:51 AM, Brian Ritter said:

I never understood why people complain about this? What's wrong with the antenna being on the roof? I don't see it as a eyesore, hell I don't even pay attention to it. 

20251121_112518.jpg

In the past gen trucks and probably the present as well. That antenna has been known to leak! I mean the antenna on my wife's 21 Acadia is all the way at the back of the roof. It's time it's been there for years.  Just give it a clean roof line already!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,760
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    MASONV88888888
    Newest Member
    MASONV88888888
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,492 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I’m definitely interested to hear the end result here. 
    • My 2025 Silverado 1500 had to receive a brand-new engine (long block) under warranty last month at only around 16,500 miles. Before the replacement, the truck repeatedly displayed "Engine Oil Level Low" warnings, even though the Oil Life Monitor still showed around 50% remaining after about 6,000 miles since my last oil change. After seeing the warning several times, I checked the dipstick with the engine cold, and the oil level was completely normal. The next day, the message escalated to "Add Engine Oil." At first, I assumed it was just a faulty oil level sensor, so I brought the truck to the dealership. After inspecting the engine, they found internal cylinder wall scoring and ultimately replaced the entire long block under warranty. Before this happened, I was planning to install a 4-inch lift and suspension upgrade on my truck. After needing a new engine at just 16,500 miles, I honestly don't see the point anymore. I also contacted GM to ask whether my vehicle qualified for a buyback, but I was informed that it does not at this time. Anyway, this experience has left me with serious concerns about the long-term reliability of this engine. I sincerely hope NHTSA expands the current investigation or recall to include 2025 model and performs a thorough inspection of affected vehicles. My biggest concern is that these engines may fail shortly after the powertrain warranty expires. If GM truly stands behind this engine, then at the very least, please consider extending the powertrain warranty to 10 years for affected owners. That would go a long way toward restoring customer confidence.
    • Without exception but then I'm the odd duck, right? I know what goes into that test, how it is calculated and thus how to beat it. But EPA values are often not beaten by the general public and the government has in past years adjusted the means and methods to come to those values to more closely approximate "Joe Average".    The only real trick to beating that EPA average is don't drive like "Joe Average".    It's the same method you used to profit from "Economic Migration" and in doing so beat the 'stats'. But you, like me, are not "Joe Average".     The thing you don't seem to grasp is this "Purchasing Power Index" isn't forward looking. It doesn't predict what it going to be but looks backward and states what it was. They are not telling us what the THINK, they are telling us what they MEASURED. Example:    Wife says "I'm going to lose 40 pounds by Christmas". May she does, maybe she doesn't but the doctors office who weighed her when she made that statement and again at Christmas only REPORTS what the RESULT was. You and I can banter about what was possible and what aunt Tilly did till the cows come home but the result is the result. Arguing otherwise is.....irrational. That's all I'm saying. This isn't about:      What you are calling a 'Statistic' is a RESULT not a CALCUATION and as a result the RULE. Like gravity as a rule, it can not be broken. 
    • Just wanted to say thank you for posting this. Years later, your thread is still helping Silverado owners.   I bought my 2025 Silverado 1500 in January 2025, and I've had what feels like the exact same rattle since day one. After reading your findings, I believe my truck has the same issue with the cable carrier contacting the rear sliding window. To be honest, I had pretty much given up on pursuing the issue. It wasn't until I recently drove another brand's pickup that I realized just how quiet their cabin was—and how noisy mine has been all along. On my truck, the rattle happens on almost any paved road, gets even worse on rougher pavement, and I can even hear it during braking and acceleration.   I actually referenced your thread when submitting my case to GM, hoping they'll recognize this as a recurring issue instead of treating it as an isolated incident. The reason I reached out to GM first is because my dealership told me they would need to keep the truck for at least two days just to diagnose the problem. I was concerned that even after two days, they still might not be able to identify the source of the rattle before giving the truck back to me. I had also asked a few dealerships about this issue during previous service visits, but none of them seemed to know what was causing it or had a solution. That's why I decided to contact GM directly first, hoping they might already have an official repair procedure or guidance for this issue.   I also hope GM eventually comes up with an official fix for this problem. I have a feeling there are many Silverado owners experiencing the same rattle, but most either choose to live with it or simply don't know what the cause is.   Really appreciate you taking the time to document your diagnosis. Your post is still making a difference years later.
    • I have 2 choices. 
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...