Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The somewhat local U-pull It junkyard (very few of those left around here) was having a 40% off Sunday sale, they usually do that when they want to try to sell a ton of stuff and turn over the inventory, most get scrapped within the next few days after these sales. My friend from work lives closer than I do and they had several Chevrolet Express Vans in the yard and I still needed a transmission for the Mustang project. Only one van had a transmission left it was the 4L80e I needed.

 

He yanked it out of a 2000 Chevy Express 2500 for me and snagged it for $60 plus the core cost and tax, a whopping $100 total. I was finding questionable transmissions on marketplace for 4x or even 6x that cost and who knows what was wrong with them.

 

After a ton of cleaning of the case I tore into it and found out why it was at the junkyard lol, has smoked forward clutches. So bad that they are fused together and couldn't pry them apart with a screw driver. The rest of the transmission is honestly in good shape, all the bushings and bearings look great still, minimal wear on parts.

 

Already ordered a rebuild kit and bought a new torque converter off Summit Racing.

 

 

20260221_160558[1].jpg

20260221_160607[1].jpg

20260221_160736[1].jpg

20260221_160647[1].jpg

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)

Pepper is in process of getting a new HPFP and six new injectors at around 192K miles. Giving the intakes a look and fretting out the brake slides. 

 

At 80K she showed 2.4% fuels in the oil running on gasoline. At 160 K zero fuels on alcohol but last wear metals were up a bit and alky is hard to see in a UOA so out of an abundance of caution and given the mileage it seems appropriate. 

 

When I get it back she goes to the dealership for the airbag recall then the body shop for a paint correction. 

 

Runs like a top yet.  

Edited by Grumpy Bear
  • Like 2
Posted

Been busy here too.

 

Shop improvements are under way, had mini-splits installed. I am also consolidating a motley crew of hand-me-down and smaller toolboxes into two 56" US General units from HF. Can't beat their stuff for the price but can't say there wasn't a little guilt too.

 

Meanwhile my project Camaro turned into a mini-disaster. The PDR work turned out amazing. The deal I cut with the guy to do a spot repair on the quarter involving some paint and body work wasn't amazing. That's my mistake and I'm not angry. I know better but for some reason I thought I could get away with it this time. The guy was relieved when I said hey, no hard feelings, you don't need to come back, I'm just going to drop the car at a shop and have them take it from here.

 

And that's what I did. The shop is taking care of some other stuff too, and of course I've got more money into the thing than it's worth now, but such is life. It's supposed to be ready next week. I'm enjoying the car, the project, and it's going to turn out great.

 

The weather has been wearing on me really hard lately, we're in the literal butthole of winter. Spring is just around the corner...can't wait for some nicer days so I can start moving on to Spring projects...

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Well it's almost spring (wouldn't know it by the weather, though) and time to let this thread fall to the bottom.

 

Picked up the Camaro from the shop yesterday afternoon after it was there two weeks to have the quarter panel professional repaired and some other work done. It turned out beautifully.

 

I've got a set of mint tail lights ready to put in now that the paint/body work is completed. Replacing both O2 sensors as a precaution (they're original). I'll keep monitoring the weep coming from the cam seal on the rear of the engine. I'm hesitant to do anything now as I want to get more miles down to see if it needs anything else.

 

The remaining to-do items are: Headliner, and diagnosing the sad power driver's window. And that's it. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,737
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Christopher Miller
    Newest Member
    Christopher Miller
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 1 Anonymous, 1,483 Guests (See full list)


  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Without knowing how bad your banging is, one suggestion is the intermediate steering shaft on the steering wheel. These used to be a problem on 800 and earlier series. The feeling/sound was sometimes described as "clunking" and was felt in the wheel. Also there is a plastic piece in the lower column that is referred to as a bearing. Not your traditional looking bearing though. Your ball joints, bushings and tie rods or steering rack (if equipped) are the main point of issues. You never mention total unit miles, only that you've put 60k on it.   You can search the site for help on the ISS description. Plenty of these have been replaced   https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=site%3Agm-trucks.com+intermediate+steering+shaft&ia=web
    • Yes I have is set with the 1mm disk (Minumim Tension), for spring spacing and I raised my truck in the rear 1.5". You can go 2mm  and I think 3mm if you need.Minimum. We are on our way to TN from GA.. My wife is driving and stated she cannot believe  and   stated she can not belive the difference.
    • Most 1 ton trucks come with the factory overload spring, which need to be removed for installation of RoadActive Suspension. Removing the overload allows proper fitment and ensures the system works as intended. The RAS® Mega-Duty kit will reduce squat and provide significant improvement vs the factory overload spring.
    • I wonder as well, why they would send me a text message with links to these suggested procedures totalling over $10,000 without even the slightest hint of how they arrived at these being necessary.
    • https://precisionlubrication.com/articles/oil-filter-efficiency/     For them it is a problem of $$$$ and compliance. To cover both they have to lie from the heart.    Government wants low waste oil numbers so the bar needs to be very low on contamination to met that requirement.  Consumer wants cheap maintenance (perceived cost). Again requiring a low bar.  OEM wants high margins at a cost effective warranty rate and lots of repeat customers. More low bar.  Filter manufacture wants the same thing the OEM wants. See the pattern?   Consumers are fickle and also want perfection requiring a HIGH bar. Inconsistent with all of the above. Consumers can be, when the put their minds to it, inquisitive, love winning arguments which requires some useful information to be available to support them. And this is where it gets sticky and the lies begin.    Information needs a solid well grounded point of reference if we are to compare in a useful way. There is a standard for this.  ISO 4548-12. This standard sets the particle size at a specific Beta ratio and darn few are faithful to its intent.    If they don't state the test method they change the particle size or the Beta ratio to hit a perceived favorable standard. They obscure the information in a way as to prevent direct comparisons leaving the consumer with one method. UOA's with an ISO 4406 test result. Pricey and not allot of labs willing to do the work. Lobby work happens everywhere, not just at the seat of government.       
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...