Jump to content

Tires  

14 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Currently have KO3's on my 2500 and love them. Less than 7K miles on them but they are quiet.

Posted

The main reason I did not run the KO3 is the siping is only halfway through the tread blocks. And drive in too much rain. 

Posted (edited)
On 5/2/2026 at 6:29 PM, Chuck FB said:

There must be something quite different about the rubber compound then if at slow speed you can notice quite a difference in wet traction from the Goodyear to the Bridgestone. I've read in the last few years about the comparison between the ATW3 ( I do own a set on another pickup but have not had enough varying conditions to make claims other than they seem fine driving down the highway so far ) and the BFG KO2 comparison, that the KO2 was not good in the wet for traction and has hydroplaning issues due to its tread block design that did not evacuate water well. That does surprise me that the ATW3 was not working out so well as for what its worth I certainly saw a lot of positive comments about that tire and my multi brand tire dealer highly suggested the Falken for my use due to some gravel use over the KO2 for sure but also the Toyo AT3. 

 

What did you do with the factory Goodyear tires, hang onto them or let them go cheap at the tire dealer.

I agree, it must be a better compound. The difference is not subtle, either at low speeds on boat ramps or on my steep driveway. The Goodyear would spin and then gain some traction, and the Bridgestone do not. Before this truck, I had AT3W, and they would also spin. I am sure many are better in the dirt, but that is not my use case. 

Edited by GAMark
  • Like 1
Posted
29 minutes ago, GAMark said:

I agree, it must be a better compound. The difference is not subtle, either at low speeds on boat ramps or on my steep driveway. The Goodyear would spin, and the Bridgestone would not. Before this truck, I had AT3W, and they would also spin. I am sure many are better in the dirt, but that is not my use case. 

 

Back when I bought the AT3W for a different truck and got some input from more than one tire dealers on their tire thoughts, one of the dealers had a KO2, Toyo AT3 and Falken AT3W lined up side by side in the showroom as they do work mostly on pickups and those are three popular tires that an independent shop can get their hands on to sell. It was the difference and was at room temperature of the three tires compounds. The KO2 and Toyo felt very similar with the squeeze test of the tread blocks but the Falken felt quite a bit firmer, it was very noticeable. Tire reviews aside as per winter traction, I wasn't that concerned about that since I was not planning on running them much during the winter anyway although some claim the AT3W was not a bad all terrain choice for winter, none will ever be as good as a dedicated winter tire with studs. 

 

As per use case, I imagine around you as well you might see guys running mud tires on rigs that are too fancy to be going off road but it looks cool in the mall parking lot !. Mud tires are not noted for their best on road traction ( never mind winter/ice conditions ) or handling or rolling resistance or being a quiet ride, or last near as long either. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Chuck FB said:

 

Back when I bought the AT3W for a different truck and got some input from more than one tire dealers on their tire thoughts, one of the dealers had a KO2, Toyo AT3 and Falken AT3W lined up side by side in the showroom as they do work mostly on pickups and those are three popular tires that an independent shop can get their hands on to sell. It was the difference and was at room temperature of the three tires compounds. The KO2 and Toyo felt very similar with the squeeze test of the tread blocks but the Falken felt quite a bit firmer, it was very noticeable...

 

As per use case, I imagine around you as well you might see guys running mud tires on rigs that are too fancy to be going off road but it looks cool in the mall parking lot !. Mud tires are not noted for their best on road traction ( never mind winter/ice conditions ) or handling or rolling resistance or being a quiet ride, or last near as long either. 

The Falken AT3W has me intrigued, looks similar to the KO2 tread pattern.

Posted

I went with the Falken AT4W when we got the truck, they were quiet and smooth for about a year then we got the howling from the front. I just rotated them so hopefully that will wear the them a bit more evenly.

 

For balancing, check out Centramatics balancers in addition to getting the wheels balanced. 

 

I find the Falkens to be heavy even compared to the Toyo AT3's I had on the Tundra. For more road use, I would consider something with a bit less lug.

Posted
36 minutes ago, PBNB said:

I went with the Falken AT4W when we got the truck, they were quiet and smooth for about a year then we got the howling from the front. I just rotated them so hopefully that will wear the them a bit more evenly.

 

For balancing, check out Centramatics balancers in addition to getting the wheels balanced. 

 

I find the Falkens to be heavy even compared to the Toyo AT3's I had on the Tundra. For more road use, I would consider something with a bit less lug.

Depending on size it seems but comparing the ATW4 to the KO3, there isn't that much weight difference at least in the tire I was comparing but your right that the Toyo AT3 is somewhat lighter as are a few other all terrain tires as well. I haven't put enough miles on my Falken AT3W set to have much wear or a chance to have vibration etc so the jury is out yet on them from my limited experience, they seem fairly quiet although not silent. 

Posted
3 hours ago, asilverblazer said:

The Falken AT3W has me intrigued, looks similar to the KO2 tread pattern.

 

The AT3W is probably not made in any size now unless there is old stock around as not long after I bought mine they started the switch to the AT4W. The KO2 has that funky shoulder block with that wedge/slit shape groove and that area of the tread seems horrible for retaining rocks that won't come out at highway speed although it spots out a lot of rocks once off of the gravel and onto the pavement and throwing rocks when on the gravel. Mind you the AT3W certainly picks some rocks as well but didn't seem as bad at least on the gravel I drive on vs the KO2. KO3, good question as I haven't been around them to see what they seem like for rock retention or how they are carcass wise if one was doing a certain amount of gravel driving. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.3k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,716
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    BDS my HD
    Newest Member
    BDS my HD
    Joined
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 476 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Hello hello looking forward to expanding my knowledge of the 2026 2500 HD that I just bought.   Truck has 3500 miles on it four-wheel-drive crew cab and I’m about to put a 6 1/2 inch BDS lift on it 18 x 10 -25 offset with 37’s   Already have the wheels and tires just waiting on the lift install in about three weeks   Question what surprises am I not gonna be happy with?  I’m not new to lifted trucks so I know that acceleration towing gas mileage all that is affected..   Question is those of you that have this truck this powertrain with a 10 speed Allison and have done the mods that I’m doing,,, how bad is it? Is that Allison constantly gonna be hunting for the right gear to go into? And what about towing, acceleration, fuel consumption as mentioned?    Lastly how come I can’t find any ring pinion gear set up for these axles and when could I expect to see them?   I apologize if there’s any typos I’m doing speech to text on my iPhone.    
    • I've got a 2013 2500 6.0L Flexfuel. Drove the truck earlier today with no issues. Went to run an errand tonight and noticed key fob wouldn't work. Figured battery was dead, so replaced fob batter. Still wasn't working. Grabbed my other set of keys with the other fob and that one wasn't working either. So I manually unlock truck and insert key. Interior lights come on, dashboard lights up, turn key and truck starts. Turn truck off, like a moron, and try starting again. This time no crank, no click, no nothing. Lights still come on and dash lights up, but now I'm getting a service 4wheel drive, service tire monitor, etc. Check voltage on battery and Im showing 12.2v. Throw my battery charger on it and give it 15 mins and try starting again. But still no crank no start. Decide maybe its a bad battery, run to autozone grab a new one and put it in. Same issue. Disconnect battery and let it sit for 15 mins. Try again and still nothing. I had managed to roll the windows down earlier as its a humid night, but now I can't get them to roll up. Power locks are also not working now. Then randomly I try the key again, and it fires right up. Immediately I roll up the windows as we have nothing but rain forecast this week. I shut it back off wait 30 seconds and start up again. Worked a 2nd time. So turn it off, start putting things back together. Try one more time, and back to no crank no start. And now the car alarm starts going off. Had to disconnect battery and leave it that way for the night as I don't think my neighbors would appreciate my alarm going off again tonight. Any thoughts or help would be appreciated. 
    • No one will care for you like you care for you. Do what you can for as long as you can. IMHO of course. 
    • How about them NICKS!!! 
    • Hi there.  Long time lurker, first post.    i have read the previous posts regarding the water ingress problem with this emblem.  I bought my 1500 SLT the  summer of 2025 new and after reading the MANY problems with these emblems failing I decided to install one anyways.  As per a YouTube video, I sealed ( or tried to) this sign with silicone sealant around the outer perimeter joint and the holes that were already somewhat sealed on the rear plate of the emblem.  And installed the connector assembly using dielectric grease on the connectors. The installation looked great and worked well for about 4 months……then FAILURE.  Grrrrrr…… I live in the great white north and wash my truck weekly in an automatic car wash  to keep the salt off.  Let me tell you that removing the old, failed emblem is a whole different animal than removing the OEM individual letters without removing the grill assembly. Mainly because the illuminated logo is built differently than the original letters which  you can remove the red surface lettering with a knife or some kind of blade which gives access to the tabs which hold the logo onto the grill. So I had to essentially destroyed the old emblem to remove it. Doing so killed my chance of doing somekind of autopsy on the failed , old logo.  But there was plenty of water inside when I ripped it apart.  Prior to installing the new assembly I tried it with the old harness and it works fine.   Does anyone have any insight as to where the water is getting into this emblem? I intend to seal the new logo with slow curing epoxy this time around using a syringe.  I think this newer emblem may be an updated unit which I hope GM got the vendor to fix. It has an October 2025 date on it.    If this one  fails,  I am just going to revert back to the non-illuminated letters….AFTER PULLING THE GRILL.    Any thoughts on sealing with epoxy would be appreciated. Thx!   Doug  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...