Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 4/19/2026 at 4:43 AM, Jsdirt said:

Hate to break it to you, but modern vehicles just REACHING 200k miles without major drivetrain issues are relics of the early 21st and most of the 20th century. Days long since gone, unfortunately for consumers.

 

I assume you're talking about the "baby Duramax". The one with a rubber band that drives the oil pump ... BEHIND the transmission. Just think about the labor on that one if your paying someone to fix it! On what planet did this sound like a good idea to GM engineers? Mind-blowing ... 

 

I can't help you with the motor mounts. You'd have to find a GM engineer that has quit out of frustration. I know there are many that have started their own businesses! One of them was on YouTube describing exactly why GM is the way it is today.

 

My suggestion is to get out from under it while you still can. Take the loss, and switch brands.

 

An even better course of action is to find something restored from the 20th century. That will reach 200k PLUS, guaranteed.

 

 

I bought a 24 3.0 new and in the first year it was at the dealer for 4-5 weeks for continued emissions issues. Last year the engine wiring harness went at 11K miles and would have been an expensive repair if not under warranty.

 

I absolutely love this truck. The way it drives, the power, the fuel economy, the way it looks, the interior, etc. But my confidence after my issues and being a member of all online communities has been lost and I'm selling the truck I bought for a 19K loss back to the dealer after 29 months and 14,300 miles and buying a new cummins 2500. Everything about the interior and exterior of that truck is a step down, but I'm hoping the combination of a cummins engine and the new ZF 8 Speed will be more reliable long term.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I bought a Cummins myself. A 32-year-old 5-speed 4x4 1st gen in '23.

 

Wish I had the sense back in '07 to buy that instead of the Silverado I spent 16 painful years with. Waiting 16 years cost me a MOUNTAIN of cash! Paid 2/3rds more than I would have back then. Even at this stage of my life, I'm still learnin' ...

 

Since I'm the one who has to maintain them, and work on them when something goes south, I've sworn off anything built after 1994. I'll gladly trade comfort, power, and mileage for a little sanity. WELL worth it!!

Edited by Jsdirt
  • Like 1
Posted

Well the 940 will last forever. I used to own a 97.5 S90, which was the same chassis. I know the 26 cummins will inevitably disappoint in terms of reliability, but my hope is that that it will be more repairable rather than a throwaway like it appears many of the major issues with the LZ0 become. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 522 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is NOT impact damage nor neglect. There were previous class action lawsuits because of such paint preparation st GM manufacturing plant. Not just the Cherry Red Color. This paint is applied in three processes to obtain the desired color.  The manufacturer will cover for 36 months or 36k miles only. That rust is actually corrosion because of the paint process failure. Corrosion is covered for 100,100 miles or a certain months. However their corrosion doesn't include this type. Go figure. Clearly manufacturer knew from previous paint issues. This started 3 weeks ago out of the blue.  
    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...