Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

All - been a while but wanted to check in. 
 

i have a 17 1500 5.3 with 220k. Oil changed every 3/5/7000 miles. Owned it since new. 
 

dod was tuned out at 75k and motor was out at 145k due to collapsed lifter. Bottom end was left alone - new cam / lifters / dod delete. 
 

I started running 5w30 from 75k to 195k. 
 

To the main issue - around 190k, it started to burn oil.  Currently it’s around a quart per 500 / 600 miles or so. Over the last 6000 oil change - I added 11 quarts lol. 
 

I tired Valvoline restore and protect for 20k miles at 3k intervals with little change. Installed a catch can at 217k and only catch about 3 oz over 3000 miles. 
 

I’ve been running 10w30 for the last 6000 miles. Just did an oil change and stuck with 10w30. 
 

I’ve ordered replacement valve covers.  It seems the numbers have been updated multiple times and the covers are the same as the next version of 5.3/6.2s. 

I’ve only installed the drivers side so far but I wanted to show you my old

cover vs new. Not much difference but it seems the old cover was bypassing the baffles and sucking oil / vapors right into the airbox. 
 

it seems GM changed some of the rivets in the middle of the baffle to maybe hold more pressure on the edges against the cover.  I’m going to drill the rivets so we can see what’s under the baffles. 
 

has anyone dealt with this much oil consumption / valve covers / updated part numbers?

 

thanks all. Really hoping this engine makes it to 400k without touching it again. 

IMG_5677.jpeg

IMG_5676.jpeg

Posted

Here’s one more of the new drivers side cover. 
 

will upload pics of the passenger side when I swap them over. 
 

also here’s my passenger side cover when the lifter collapsed at 145k in November of 2022. 
 

IMG_5675.jpeg

IMG_5582.jpeg

Posted

Have you looked at your brake vacuum pump?

 

 On the 2017 Chevy 5.3L, a failing mechanical brake vacuum pump can cause excess oil consumption. The pump relies on engine oil for lubrication and a seal. If internal seals fail, the pump will draw oil directly out of the crankcase and push it into the brake booster or intake, where it is burned.Key Symptoms of a Failing Vacuum Pump. Hard or stiff brake pedal: Loss of vacuum assist makes braking effort significantly harder.Oil in the vacuum line: Disconnecting the vacuum line to the brake booster will reveal wet oil inside the hose.Noisy operation: A clicking, grinding, or loud tapping sound coming from the front/driver's side of the engine.Smoke from the tailpipe: Burning oil as it cycles through the intake.

  • Like 1
Posted

I just deleted the vac pump but there was no oil in the line to the booster and brakes always felt great. Wanted to remove it from the equation before it was an issue.  I installed the two plugs in the oil passages and a block off plate. 
 

there’s a company that makes a vac manifold that goes between the purge valve and the intake. I used that for the booster vac line - I didn’t want to T into my catch can return line. 
 

the vac pump was replaced under warranty back in 2019 or so, so it was the new style pump. 
 

  • Like 1
Posted

I don’t care if it stops burning oil. I just need to slow it down.  It’s got 220k. I never missed an oil change. It doesn’t make sense for the oil rings to not do their job - the plugs aren’t caked and my factory cats are still in place and functioning.  
 

I don’t think there’s excessive crankcase pressure from worn compression rings because I don’t get a lot of oil in my catch can between the PCV valve and the intake. 
 

I tore apart the old driver side VC. There’s a sealant between the alum valve cover and steel baffle assembly that’s riveted down.  It seems the seal let go near the port that goes to the intake / before the throttle body. 
 

The design looks like a sealed side that sucks from the air intake and pulls from 3 / 6 holes and then internal baffles seperate the oil / vapors from the air and then drain back down and drip to the heads. 
 

Once that seal fails, oil will be sucked up right into the air intake / before the throttle body. It won’t pass through the separators and you’ll burn more oil. Add in the fact that both valve covers could attribute to this and you may end up with significant consumption, especially when you add in the amount of miles. 
 

I do not have a brand new valve cover to tear apart to see what they changed inside the cover. Part of me wants to waste the $75 but that’s 6 quarts of oil if these fixes don’t work lol. 
 

see pics of drivers side cover pulled apart. 
 


 

 

IMG_5680.jpeg

IMG_5681.jpeg

IMG_5682.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Did the passenger side today. Seemed worse than the drivers side. I’ll check back in 5000 miles or when the low oil light comes on - whichever comes first. 
 

on another note - went to do sway bar bushings and 3 of 4 bolts broke. Gotta love New England. 
 

 

IMG_5687.jpeg

IMG_5691.jpeg

  • Like 3
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I'm at 315k miles on my L83, dod/afm still operable. It "uses" about 1.5-2qts per 5k miles. I use Valvoline 5w30. I top it off at 2,500 miles between changes I had to replace the valve cover gaskets a while back, the passenger side was leaking and soaked the starter. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,759
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    DM22
    Newest Member
    DM22
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 2,951 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • My 2015 1500 LTZ Silverado suddenly won't go into 4 x 4 low. It will go into 4 x 4 high.
    • Yep, just a quick reference point.    My main point being I’d do a thousand other things before I’d pay 10k for a transmission.    Speaking in ignorance cause I don’t look at these trucks, what is it worth? 20k?
    • I think users are going to want to pick their monitored parameters, which parameters they want to see first.    It should probably start with baseline at a minimum and adjust to learned, but be able to overlay baseline for comparison.   A simple severity level would be able to determine what type of alerting is appropriate or user selectable.    Why not use the OBD port though?   I think a phone connection would be a good idea, push notifications type deal.   Number 1 issue is having data is useless if you don’t know what the data should be under normal conditions. 
    • I thought I would use your thread and add to it as I just did my first longer drive with my truck in the last couple of days. I drove from the Grande Prairie area of Alberta down to Edmonton and most of where I drove in the city was the ring road so fairly free flowing but a bit of stop and go as well in the city. Stayed the night and returned home and not too many stops along the way each way but every restart and certainly every cold start sets it back for fuel mileage. Why I say that is I see some people will cherry pick a fuel mileage leg after the vehicle had been warmed up driveline wise before hand and its a forgiving ( easy rolling drive leg for example ) and call that their fuel mileage which can give a false perception of reality. I was not heavily loaded at all but never the less the flip bak cover, rubber bed mat, various tools etc and extra jerry cans of fuel all way up to a few hundred pounds of dead weight so its not an empty truck. The cold inflation tire pressures are set more near the freezing point so once they are warmed up driving I was showing 45 front and over 40 rear and realize high inflation pressures would help a little in fuel mileage but certainly not the ride on our crap sections of highway. The weather was good so was not raining as that can really drag mileage down, in fact I had a bit of a tail wind on average driving home. Most people on here would never have driven on that freeway to visualize it but its got a fair bit of rolling type of landscape with numerous river valleys. For the most part I had it on cruise set to 62 although kicking it off if I caught it in time before it started down shifting and self braking going down the grades. Most of the more substantial grades its shifting into 7th I believe as 8th just doesn't have it. Total distance round trip was 643 miles and my overall average and I did refuel three times in all, figured out to 17.65 miles per US gallon. My best fuel mileage section refuel within all of this figured out to 18.46 and these are all hand calculated figures. I find if anything that the trucks computer can be over optimistic, sometimes its pretty close but other times its stretching it. On paper persay in theory the truck would have just about made it on fumes for that whole drive without refueling once.    Which made me think of the topic thread of the wonder if these trucks could do 20 mpg and that is a good question, certainly would have to be on an easy going flat highway, no head wind, the right temperature, not packing around a bunch of dead weight and puttering along even slower than I was I would suspect and going steady and not stopping to smell the flowers or take a piss !. It probably is possible but not without effort to attain that with the wind resistance and weight of these trucks. Of course on my drive most people are passing me if they have the power as per loaded highway tractors, never mind a lot of speedy vehicles but the speed limit is 68 and most are at or well over that. 
    • Monday looks like a good day for the dealer to test an ac issue. Hopefully it all turns out good.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...