Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

All - been a while but wanted to check in. 
 

i have a 17 1500 5.3 with 220k. Oil changed every 3/5/7000 miles. Owned it since new. 
 

dod was tuned out at 75k and motor was out at 145k due to collapsed lifter. Bottom end was left alone - new cam / lifters / dod delete. 
 

I started running 5w30 from 75k to 195k. 
 

To the main issue - around 190k, it started to burn oil.  Currently it’s around a quart per 500 / 600 miles or so. Over the last 6000 oil change - I added 11 quarts lol. 
 

I tired Valvoline restore and protect for 20k miles at 3k intervals with little change. Installed a catch can at 217k and only catch about 3 oz over 3000 miles. 
 

I’ve been running 10w30 for the last 6000 miles. Just did an oil change and stuck with 10w30. 
 

I’ve ordered replacement valve covers.  It seems the numbers have been updated multiple times and the covers are the same as the next version of 5.3/6.2s. 

I’ve only installed the drivers side so far but I wanted to show you my old

cover vs new. Not much difference but it seems the old cover was bypassing the baffles and sucking oil / vapors right into the airbox. 
 

it seems GM changed some of the rivets in the middle of the baffle to maybe hold more pressure on the edges against the cover.  I’m going to drill the rivets so we can see what’s under the baffles. 
 

has anyone dealt with this much oil consumption / valve covers / updated part numbers?

 

thanks all. Really hoping this engine makes it to 400k without touching it again. 

IMG_5677.jpeg

IMG_5676.jpeg

Posted

Here’s one more of the new drivers side cover. 
 

will upload pics of the passenger side when I swap them over. 
 

also here’s my passenger side cover when the lifter collapsed at 145k in November of 2022. 
 

IMG_5675.jpeg

IMG_5582.jpeg

Posted

Have you looked at your brake vacuum pump?

 

 On the 2017 Chevy 5.3L, a failing mechanical brake vacuum pump can cause excess oil consumption. The pump relies on engine oil for lubrication and a seal. If internal seals fail, the pump will draw oil directly out of the crankcase and push it into the brake booster or intake, where it is burned.Key Symptoms of a Failing Vacuum Pump. Hard or stiff brake pedal: Loss of vacuum assist makes braking effort significantly harder.Oil in the vacuum line: Disconnecting the vacuum line to the brake booster will reveal wet oil inside the hose.Noisy operation: A clicking, grinding, or loud tapping sound coming from the front/driver's side of the engine.Smoke from the tailpipe: Burning oil as it cycles through the intake.

  • Like 1
Posted

I just deleted the vac pump but there was no oil in the line to the booster and brakes always felt great. Wanted to remove it from the equation before it was an issue.  I installed the two plugs in the oil passages and a block off plate. 
 

there’s a company that makes a vac manifold that goes between the purge valve and the intake. I used that for the booster vac line - I didn’t want to T into my catch can return line. 
 

the vac pump was replaced under warranty back in 2019 or so, so it was the new style pump. 
 

  • Like 1
Posted

I don’t care if it stops burning oil. I just need to slow it down.  It’s got 220k. I never missed an oil change. It doesn’t make sense for the oil rings to not do their job - the plugs aren’t caked and my factory cats are still in place and functioning.  
 

I don’t think there’s excessive crankcase pressure from worn compression rings because I don’t get a lot of oil in my catch can between the PCV valve and the intake. 
 

I tore apart the old driver side VC. There’s a sealant between the alum valve cover and steel baffle assembly that’s riveted down.  It seems the seal let go near the port that goes to the intake / before the throttle body. 
 

The design looks like a sealed side that sucks from the air intake and pulls from 3 / 6 holes and then internal baffles seperate the oil / vapors from the air and then drain back down and drip to the heads. 
 

Once that seal fails, oil will be sucked up right into the air intake / before the throttle body. It won’t pass through the separators and you’ll burn more oil. Add in the fact that both valve covers could attribute to this and you may end up with significant consumption, especially when you add in the amount of miles. 
 

I do not have a brand new valve cover to tear apart to see what they changed inside the cover. Part of me wants to waste the $75 but that’s 6 quarts of oil if these fixes don’t work lol. 
 

see pics of drivers side cover pulled apart. 
 


 

 

IMG_5680.jpeg

IMG_5681.jpeg

IMG_5682.jpeg

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Did the passenger side today. Seemed worse than the drivers side. I’ll check back in 5000 miles or when the low oil light comes on - whichever comes first. 
 

on another note - went to do sway bar bushings and 3 of 4 bolts broke. Gotta love New England. 
 

 

IMG_5687.jpeg

IMG_5691.jpeg

  • Like 3
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I'm at 315k miles on my L83, dod/afm still operable. It "uses" about 1.5-2qts per 5k miles. I use Valvoline 5w30. I top it off at 2,500 miles between changes I had to replace the valve cover gaskets a while back, the passenger side was leaking and soaked the starter. 

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Any update if the new valve cover help with the oil consumption? 
I have a 2014 GMC sierra and my truck is consuming a lot of oil so I’m wondering if replacing the driver side valve cover will stop some of the oil consumption. Thanks 

Posted
On 5/30/2026 at 8:33 PM, mdipasquale20 said:

All - been a while but wanted to check in. 
 

i have a 17 1500 5.3 with 220k. Oil changed every 3/5/7000 miles. Owned it since new. 
 

dod was tuned out at 75k and motor was out at 145k due to collapsed lifter. Bottom end was left alone - new cam / lifters / dod delete. 
 

I started running 5w30 from 75k to 195k. 
 

To the main issue - around 190k, it started to burn oil.  Currently it’s around a quart per 500 / 600 miles or so. Over the last 6000 oil change - I added 11 quarts lol. 
 

I tired Valvoline restore and protect for 20k miles at 3k intervals with little change. Installed a catch can at 217k and only catch about 3 oz over 3000 miles. 
 

I’ve been running 10w30 for the last 6000 miles. Just did an oil change and stuck with 10w30. 
 

I’ve ordered replacement valve covers.  It seems the numbers have been updated multiple times and the covers are the same as the next version of 5.3/6.2s. 

I’ve only installed the drivers side so far but I wanted to show you my old

cover vs new. Not much difference but it seems the old cover was bypassing the baffles and sucking oil / vapors right into the airbox. 
 

it seems GM changed some of the rivets in the middle of the baffle to maybe hold more pressure on the edges against the cover.  I’m going to drill the rivets so we can see what’s under the baffles. 
 

has anyone dealt with this much oil consumption / valve covers / updated part numbers?

 

thanks all. Really hoping this engine makes it to 400k without touching it again. 

IMG_5677.jpeg

IMG_5676.jpeg

 

Did all this valve cover work slow the oil consumption? 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,958
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    B07
    Newest Member
    B07
    Joined
  • Who's Online   3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 695 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Looks like it's riveted to me. What is wrong with that 1? Welcome to the Forum!
    • Missing pieces of the Assembly   Detergency vs Solvency   Not the same thing. Detergency is the mechanism that surrounds solid particulates preventing amalgamation. Usually accompanied by a Dispersant whose job it is to keep those encapsulated particles in Suspension. Solvency keeps things that can be dissolved in solution.    Salt is a solid that can be dissolved. Pepper is a solid that cannot be dissolved. A detergent/dispersant is effective on pepper but a solvent is more effective on salt. As long as the solids remain in either state, dissolved or dispersed then they can be be removed with the oil upon change.    How many wranglers does it take to herd cats? Depends on how many cats your herding. How much sponge does it take to soak up water? How much water is there to soak up? Point is most oil blends start with some herding ability and next to zero sponge and recently even fewer wranglers are being sent to do the same job.    So you start with a dozen cowboys and zero cows but at the drive progresses you pick up cows along the way, but not cowboys. At some point you have more cows that the wranglers can handle and some leave the herd. Deposits. And the API has an acceptable number of cows they are willing to let loose. In the ideal world zero is the right number for he rancher but to the butcher....a few lost is fine. This cow is beat to death. Let's move on....   Solvency isn't something oils on the Walmart shelf care about AT ALL. Problem is, you motor does. Fuels driven varnish sticks rings and only a solvent can keep them in check. The bet is that the solids driven portion that plug the expander rings and the oil drain backs and VVT screens and AFM screens will be an issue long before varnish is. Not that it wont be but if they market well enough the consumer can be kept ignorant enough to either believe it is "normal" (A quart in 1 or 2K is normal) OR is kept at bay longer than the first owner is likely to hang on to the unit. Solvency cost money.    Now the OEM's have John Q. Public buffaloed into the belief that the number cows accumulated along the trail is a known and predictable CONSTANT. It isn't. Nor is the rate at which they crossed paths with them. Only the number of wrangles is constant. Or was. Each new generation of oil sees fewer and fewer of them.    So what happens when the number of cowboys is lower (lower TBN) with each seasons trail but the trial is longer (OCI) and the number of cows along that trail continues increase? (Conditions that promote deposits).    For awhile the blenders were on to something. Better bases are harder to degrade (fewer cows) but that was overtaken by a longer trail (OCI) and improved breeding (More cows) while continuing to reduce the cowboy staffing levels (TBN/Aniline #).    Marketing has been successful. We've fired most of the staff, cows breed line bunnies, the trail is ten times longer and we've convinced the boss his ranch is in better shape that it ever was.    That kids is just the cleaning side. The side few pay attention to.     
    • Mann+Hummel since 1941 per their web site 
    • Looking for this part for my truck. They don't sell just that one piece and to get it you have to pay over $100 even used for the whole air tube. The piece the hose clamp snaps into that is held on by the screw and nut. If anyone has access to one please let me know.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...