OK here the true question lies

General Lee 01 · April 13, 2004

As paco would say, "vote."

pacodiablo · April 13, 2004

I like both cars a lot, but I voted GN. The HO 305 just isn't enough to beat the turbo 3.8.

benis · April 13, 2004

gotta go w/ the GN again.

MCourson · April 13, 2004

Same here, GN

Wingnut · April 13, 2004

Monte Carlo getting flat out SPANKED.

Both are great cars though. I would own either.

watz · April 13, 2004

Why is this even a poll?

The fastest production car of the 80's (bumped to 20 psi the, fastest till 12.2 viper) vs. a very, VERY mild monte?

The SPEEDY · April 13, 2004

power six <----- nough said

piratebaseball · April 13, 2004

Me and my dad built a 1986 Monte SS with a 355 and a lingenfelter superram induction system. Ran high 11's in the 1/4 on street tires and got 28 mpg on the hwy. No NOS, turbo, supercharger, et cetera. Just straight power. And I love the way the front end looks on the monte. No hating on the grand national. It's one of the quickest ever made. But I love the monte's and what you can do to them.

watz · April 14, 2004

Me and my dad built a 1986 Monte SS with a 355 and a lingenfelter superram induction system. Ran high 11's in the 1/4 on street tires and got 28 mpg on the hwy. No NOS, turbo, supercharger, et cetera. Just straight power. And I love the way the front end looks on the monte. No hating on the grand national. It's one of the quickest ever made. But I love the monte's and what you can do to them.

That's to bad for 1,500$ you could have been going as fast in a GN....

11 seconds

Or if you wanted to spend about the same money you could have gone hellas fast:

10 second:

10 seconds

Or if you wanted to be ridiculas you could get crazy and go:

9 seconds...

Stupid V6 has no balls