Jump to content

1968 Camaro


RyanbabZ71

Recommended Posts

Posted

Whatcha think?

 

CI2060006.jpg

 

They are asking 4K

 

has a 350, AT, PS, new cowl hood and spoiler.

 

there is another one but they want 26K its fully restored

Posted

Hmm if there's a picture it either didn't load for me or the link is missing. Anyway, always tempted with ideas there Ryan. ha

Posted

I'm guessing you that you will be doing the work you self to restore it? To me buying an older car is usually hit or miss. You either get a strait body with little or no rust, or you get a car that has bondo filled rust holes.

 

Have you gotten any information on it? Has somebody started restoring it?

Posted

Sounds like a pretty good deal. Although I would give it a thorough inspection before buying, you want to make sure that you're not going to get into more work than you want by saving the money.

Posted

I like the 1st gen Camaro's but it looks like it's been abused. If your looking for a project though, go for it. If your looking for a daily driver, maybe not.

Posted

I didnt say I was buying it. I thought about it before I seen the color pic (like posted above). Before that all i seen was a black and white

 

now this is the one i like. Its 26K though :lol:

 

CI2061272.jpg

Posted

The $4k one woulds be a good project car. I'm sure you could find many aftermarket or possibly OEM numbers-matching parts for it. If you do decide to buy it, then congrats to you! Those cars are real machines once they're dressed up all nice. :lol:

Posted

what about this one

 

http://www.auto-rv.com/default.asp?area=br...dname=CI2080446

 

do you think its worth $4,400? Has a 327, AT floor shift

 

I think out of the cheaper ones it looks the best. I did a NADA Appraisal and the low retail is $7413 (with the at and 327 and air but I dont know if it has that or not). High retail is $23150.

 

Man the possibilities.

Posted

Is the $4K one a RS as well? Back when I was in HS a friend of mine restored a 68 RS as well over many years (and many thousand of dollars). He had to fix the hideaway headlights, swapped out the PG for a TH400, 4 piston disc up front, new 402 motor, 12 bolt posi in the rear, interior, and paint to cover that ugly green paint :rolleyes:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • It would be sold as a "kit", lights + auth/programming code.   You can resell the code to someone else, if they just buy the lights, either new or used, and they can then use the code to get them to work on their truck.
    • Apologies in advance, this is a long post, there's a lot to explain.   A friend had a 2010 Avalanche with a 5.3 (LMG) that blew the head gaskets (amount other problems). He gave me a donor motor out of a 2007 suburban (LC9). I got it all installed, and everything hooked up. Went to go start it, and it stumbled a bit at first and died a couple times, but after trying a few times it sounded like it was running very well. Went out to go get some coolant, and came back the next day.    Upon trying to start it, the truck will crank and fire normally and the RPMs will raise to around 1,200 or 1,500, sounding great, and then the RPMs will decrease and it will just die. Repeat that a dozen or two dozen times, and eventually it will fire and idle beautifully. As soon as you touch the throttle, it will start misfiring and sound like absolute trash. When you let off the throttle it will come down and hunt around shaking and misfiring like crazy. A message will come up on the dash saying reduced engine power.    It is throwing codes for a map sensor circuit voltage High, as well as MAF sensor low frequency. With key on engine off, the map sensor reads about 4.8 volts on the vout pin, which the PCM interprets as about 17.8 PSI, contrasted to the barometer which my scan tool tells me reads about 13.5 PSI. However, once the engine starts and is idling this reading drops to about 5-6 PSI at a stable idle, and varies significantly when the engine is misfiring/ hunting like I said before. I should note that I used the intake and MAP sensor from the LC9 engine. I changed the connector on the 2010 harness to The 2007 connector. The pinouts for the sensors were printed right on the top, and I triple-checked that I put the correct wire into the correct place.   On the other hand, the MAF sensor reads consistently 0.0 g/s regardless of State. I have pulled my hair out trying to figure out this last detail. I have tried three different sensors, (all of which should be good, one of which was new), I have verified all the wiring from the sensor going back to the PCM, and have verified that the readings at the PCM are the same readings as at the sensor itself. The intake air temperature sensor is also functioning as normal. I verified all the voltages and grounds etc, and everything is as it should be. I don't have an oscilloscope to verify, but I probed with my multimeter (Klein mm720) on frequency Mode, and it reads that on initial cranking, the maf is producing between 3000 and 7000 HZ, and as soon as the engine fires that falls off to below, 1000, and if the engine continues to run, it will produce somewhat erratic readings between 5 and 100-200 HZ. It does increase notably when the engine is revved despite the misfirings. As I said before, I have verified all of the wires going to the PCM, and I have tried multiple known good sensors. I've tested all the pins and voltages from the sensor and verified them against the manual that they are what they should be. I tested all the wiring for both ohms and voltage drop, and everything tested fine. Like I said I tested at the sensor as well as right at the PCM, everything checked out.   The only other thing of note at least I think is the fact that the engine originally in the truck had VVT, but the engine I put in, the lc9, does not have VVT. I modified the cam sensor plug to work. I reference the wiring diagrams and double-checked that I modified the harness correctly to adapt it. There is obviously a code for the VVT solenoid, but I don't think that's the cause of my problems, and this friend will probably have the PCM sent off to tune out the codes at some point.   I'm writing this for my bed so I don't recall the exact codes, but I'll update the post tomorrow morning with the exact codes. And ideas or feedback much appreciated. 
    • It's possible the two trucks are using different body control modules which is why yours works and the OP's doesn't.   So much in these newer vehicles depends on model/trim configurations, production date. They don't all use the same modules like back in the day.
    • I forgot to answer the question as per what market mine is set to and yes I finally found that area on mine and yes its also set to America.   So here's something I realized as I wasn't looking at that part in the Sierra section until now, your right that what I see here as choice 3 under Sierra which says 07/2023-06/2026 ( 433 MHz 13542523 ) it has no choice 5 for tire pressure selection. Where as it does under the Chev choice. However I kept going down the list within the Sierra and I am really wondering if choice 9 will work for your truck as it has the same model number and hertz sensor as my truck. I would say try that choice first, if that doesn't work then jump over to the Chev section and again choose that same model and hertz choice as for some reason the Chev section gives the choice 5 of tire type/pressure selection for going back a number of years. Could very well be an Autel thing that they just didn't get the updates all done properly under Sierra but anyway first try that selection 9 I suggested under Sierra and then go from there. 
    • Looking for this piece that holds the hose clamp in place. I have the hose clamp just not that other piece. Dealers and wrecking yards in my area will not sell just that piece. They want you to buy the whole air tube $100 +/- to get that $5 part.  that piece isn't molded to the air tube as I looked at my friends truck. It's held on by a screw and nut. I'm trying to put the OEM parts on the truck as the previous owner butchered things up installing an aftermarket CAI. It really looked homemade. 🤣 Thanks
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...