Bush or Kerry

[maximumrebel1]

I haven't read the agreement when I became a member hopefully I'm allowed to do this. If not sorry to the moderators.

[Frank S]

No it's perfectly allowed,just like discussions in all other acceptable areas.There is a chance it can get out of hand and everyone please remember,debates and mild disagreements are fine but please bring your facts with you when you voice an opinion ie:If you say I'm voting for candidate "x" because I don't like candidate "y" then that's fine.

 

However,infalamatory comments such as candidate "x" sucks because,ummmm....he sucks!,is kind of ridiculous and will only start a flame war which none of us want.

 

The topic is fine just please keep it respectful.

[LikeaRock14]

Ya'll can figure, If I could vote

[MCourson]

My member title answers for me.

[lrymal]

Wish our choices included "other" or "neither".

[kclm7]

No doubt I'm voting for Bush just like I did in 2000. There are issues I don't agree with him on but I would never, ever want to damage this country by helping to elect a socialist like Kerry.

[R Dogg 56]

 

[maximumrebel1]

I'm with you there 100% kclm7 Bush is a pretty liberal spender but you have to consider the alternative liberal socialist liar Kerry. Earlier in the year I thought it was gonna be close but after the convention and especially after Zell's speech I think the outlook is alittle more optimistic.

[ToeJam]

I voted for Bush in 2000, but I was on the fence for awhile in this election. If the Dems would field a candidate that wasn't so liberal and wasn't aligned with Kennedy then they would have a chance for my vote. But I have two or three values/beliefs that I won't stray from and Bush has them all and Kerry has none.

 

So I'm Bush, 100%. But I still think there is a good chance Kerry will win.

[maximumrebel1]

After hearing Zell Millers speech I'm suprised anyone can still be voting for Kerry. the facts are out there if anyone cares to actually do some research and don't believe everything on CNN.

[99silveradoz71]

I've got to be going GW again. I think he did a nice job last night making himself personably by pointing out his errors, like trouble with English at times, etc.

 

In other news, that Reagan tribute the other night was simply awesome.

[maximumrebel1]

Apparently it's only the Bush people that aren't ashamed and therefore post.

[Elwood]

Still haven't decided who to vote for.

Have always been a huge Bush supporter, but there are too many things that I disagree with him on big time. Problem is there are a lot of other things I disagree with Kerry on big time. I can easily say if there was any other third party canidate besides Nader I would vote that way.

 

My biggest problem is how they spend more time talking about each others faults than they do talking about what is good about themselves. I'll figure out what I'm doing by the election (I hope), but until then I'll be undecided.

 

I guess that's the problem with not indentifying so strongly with either party, it make these decisions harder for me.

 

I'm registered Independent, but have always voted Republican for President (except when I voted for Perot), any other race I have voted either way at different times. But the main thing is that I VOTE. What I don't understand is the people who just don't vote at all.

[MCourson]

My biggest problem is how they spend more time talking about each others faults than they do talking about what is good about themselves.

Yea the 527s on both sides are really annoying IMO. One side has a negative ad about the other, the other gets angry, allegations start flying, etc. Its really just a conter productive mess.

[Hecktorx]

No doubt I'm voting for Bush just like I did in 2000. There are issues I don't agree with him on but I would never, ever want to damage this country by helping to elect a socialist like Kerry.

 

And could someone explain to me what a "Sensitive War on Terror" is.