Jump to content

Differences between Avalanche and 1500 CC

Musgofasta

Recommended Posts

Musgofasta Enthusiast

Musgofasta

Posted
Posted

Hey everyone :D

 

Been checking out the 1500 crew cabs, but last nite took a hard look at the avalanche, and now I've got some questions for you all.

 

Are the cabs and interiors the same for the two? It looks to me that from the back of the rear doors forward, the two are identical, except suspensions. What's everyone's take on this?

 

What makes the avalanche more than 2000 bucks more, except for the midgate? suspension? interior stuff? I don't get it.

 

My plan was a crew cab with a bed lid and carpet, but then I've basically got an Avalanche! And the avalanche would give me a big ass bed if I needed it.

 

Has anyone else had this dillemma, or own both? And why can you get 4.10 gears in the avalanche but not the crew cab? 4.10's are a helluva lot better than 3.42's!

 

Thanks everyone! :chevy:

hihosilverado Enthusiast

hihosilverado

Posted
Posted

All I have is opinions not facts, but I will share them! If you are gonna use the vehicle for much hauling, I would stick with the Silverado. The real bed IMO is more useful for hauling stuff a truck is made to haul, like ATVS :D . However, if you are planning on using it as a car 95% of the time go with the 'lanche. It is more carlike to ride in and very smooth riding. Might make a more comfortable tow rig. I think the midgate is garbage. It is better at leaking than anything else. I would not plan on folding it down all the time, it will get old. As far as looks go, it is a tossup, but I prefer the look of a Z71 over an avalanche, but I do like the wbh avalanches (without body hardware) better than the plasticized ones. The inside is basically identical. To sum it up, I think it basically boils down to how you are gonna use the vehicle. If it is a family truck that is vacation bound get an Avalanche, if your uses are the other extreme, bet a Crew Cab. And, you can get 3.73 gears in the Silverado, and I would recommend them. My 02 Silverado has 4.10 and they are not necessary. I hope this helps some.

Shaners Senior Enthusiast

Shaners

Posted
Posted

If I'm not mistaken, the 1500 Avalanche is built on the 1500 Suburban chassis.

 

It will give a better ride, but less carrying capacity.

Greg Senior Enthusiast

Greg

Posted
Posted

I had an Avalanche and it was a great freeway cruiser. Like Shaners said, that Suburban wheelbase and chassis is great for that. The shorter length of the Av makes it easier to fit in a garage, but it might be taller than some conventional pickups. The big difference is the bed:

 

- The Av already has a bed cover, bed mat, and bed storage compartments. You don't need to buy these.

 

- With the midgate open, the Av will give you an enclosed 8' bed. Something the 1500 crewcab can't.

 

- Accessing the Av's bed stinks. You can't reach over the sides, even with the covers removed. Reaching stuff that rolls to the front of the bed means dropping the midgate, grabbing a rake, or crawling in. Buying a bedslide helps, but you lose height under the covers. (I have one available, cheap!)

 

When I bought a new truck this fall, I bought an extended cab Sierra Denali instead of another Av. Then again, I wanted the larger bed, 6 L engine, quadrasteer, etc.

dogzapper Enthusiast

dogzapper

Posted
Posted

Avalanche?

 

Been there, done that. Rear visibility is horrible and changing back into the right lane is always a guessing game. Bed access is impossible from the sides and difficult from the rear. Smooth on the highway, but "hunts" on anything not resembeling pavement.

 

I went back to a Silverado Z-71 EC/SB in 2003 and have never regretted dumping my 2002 - 2500 Avalanche. Obviously, I would buy the crew cab Z-71 Slverado today.

 

Friend, buy the Z-71 Silverado and don't get caught up in the Avalanche. And if a non-truck is what you want, buy a Suburban or Tahoe.

 

The 5.3 engine in our 2003 Silverado is a wonder, by the way. Superb mileage (20/15) and excellent power for towing/hauling. We have the 3.73, which is impossible to get in the 2005, but you will be more than satisfied with the 5.3 liter. Forget the 4.8; less power and same mileage.

 

Hope this helps,

 

Steve

WyRam Enthusiast

WyRam

Posted
Posted
Hey everyone  :D

 

Been checking out the 1500 crew cabs, but last nite took a hard look at the avalanche, and now I've got some questions for you all.

 

Are the cabs and interiors the same for the two?  It looks to me that from the back of the rear doors forward, the two are identical, except suspensions.  What's everyone's take on this? 

 

What makes the avalanche more than 2000 bucks more, except for the midgate?  suspension?  interior stuff?  I don't get it. 

 

My plan was a crew cab with a bed lid and carpet, but then I've basically got an Avalanche!  And the avalanche would give me a big ass bed if I needed it. 

 

Has anyone else had this dillemma, or own both?  And why can you get 4.10 gears in the avalanche but not the crew cab?  4.10's are a helluva lot better than 3.42's!

 

Thanks everyone! :chevy:

 

 

 

4.10s are the option gear in the CrewCab,I have one.Dave Smith in Idaho had over 30 CrewCab GMs on the lot all with 3.42s,they had to dealer trade to get me one with 4.10s.1085 miles on mine and I love it,too much plastic on the Avi for me!
sperry Enthusiast

sperry

Posted
Posted

I did a hell of a lot of study and ended up with a plastic Avalanche. However It has to be YOUR lifestyle and need. I couldn't fit a Silverado HD in my garage, so I went this way. I still have my S-10 long bed and I worked it well. Sand, gravel, concrete and all except a good fit of drywall and/or plywood. Which happens to fit well and dry inside the Av.

 

Being versitile doesn't mean that you get everything each way you convert it. Closed, it isn't a `burb and open, it won't hold the cargo weight of a similar-class pickup or hitch up a 5th wheel. And although some have done it, I wouldn't want a scoop of sand or gravel in mine. But, again, I have the S-10 for that - as small as it is for that sort of thing. If I needed to hitch up a 1 yard trailer of concrete, I'll do that in the Av, just as one would with a Silverado. (It's too much for my old `82 S-10).

 

If you're looking for ride comfort, a travel vehicle, and as I like it better than the old pickup bed, the comfort of stretching out inside. So far I have NO regrets or "leaks" that is not part of the normal drainage.

 

What I don't like is shared with all of our later model trucks. Obnoxious chimes, the OEM crappy bozo (premium) amp (that I changed for the luxury one, that which is the exception for the Denali's and Escalades). And too much "torque management".

 

If you have an interest in the Avalanche or EXT, try this site; it's packed with Avalanche info. CAFCNA

 

Aesop 540BC: "People often begrudge what they cannot enjoy themselves".

I'll bet he never owned a Frod or Dudge.. evil.gif

WyRam Enthusiast

WyRam

Posted
Posted
I did a hell of a lot of study and ended up with a plastic Avalanche. However It has to be YOUR lifestyle and need. I couldn't fit a Silverado HD in my garage, so I went this way. I still have my S-10 long bed and I worked it well. Sand, gravel, concrete and all except a good fit of drywall and/or plywood. Which happens to fit well and dry inside the Av.

 

Being versitile doesn't mean that you get everything each way you convert it. Closed, it isn't a `burb and open, it won't hold the cargo weight of a similar-class pickup or hitch up a 5th wheel. And although some have done it, I wouldn't want a scoop of sand or gravel in mine. But, again, I have the S-10 for that - as small as it is for that sort of thing. If I needed to hitch up a 1 yard trailer of concrete, I'll do that in the Av, just as one would with a Silverado. (It's too much for my old `82 S-10).

 

If you're looking for ride comfort, a travel vehicle, and as I like it better than the old pickup bed, the comfort of stretching out inside. So far I have NO regrets or "leaks" that is not part of the normal drainage.

 

What I don't like is shared with all of our later model trucks. Obnoxious chimes, the OEM crappy bozo (premium) amp (that I changed for the luxury one, that which is the exception for the Denali's and Escalades). And too much "torque management".

 

If you have an interest in the Avalanche or EXT, try this site; it's packed with Avalanche info. CAFCNA

 

Aesop 540BC: "People often begrudge what they cannot enjoy themselves".

I'll bet he never owned a Frod or Dudge.. evil.gif

 

 

 

I think since the mid year 04 release of the 1500 CrewCab with 5 3/4ft box the decision is not as easy as it has been in the past!
MyBigToy Enthusiast

MyBigToy

Posted
Posted

If you don't use your truck as a work vehicle all of the time, go with the Avalanche. It's a lot more versatile and rides and handles a lot better than the trucks since it has the Suburban's coil spring rear suspension on it.

 

I've had my Avalanche for 2-1/2 years now and have had zero problems or leaks with it. You get used to the visibility issues but I also solved it by purchasing and self-installing an aftermarket Poron talking reverse sensing system for $62.

sperry Enthusiast

sperry

Posted
Posted

That, or the ever-popular back-up cam kits.

 

I have one that displays on my Nav radio screen. See quite well back there now.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Deadwood
      primary drive belt tensioner

      By Deadwood · Posted

      I bought belts and pulleys for my '20 L5P at Rock Auto a couple years ago. I have used them for many years, and almost always save significant money, especially when I buy maintenance stuff ahead of time.   They carry many OEM parts, which is all I use unless an aftermarket is shown to be same/superior, or if it is an insignificant part or unavailable OEM part anywhere else. RA is usually lower priced, often by a bunch, but parts are sometimes unavailable or out of stock, and I do shop around and sometimes find better prices at other sites.   Be aware that you pay shipping, and if you buy multiple items and they are coming from different warehouses, the shipping can kill the advantage. Planning ahead is best if possible.   If you have a transmission service in the near future, check out their OEM (AC Delco ULV) fluid, usually MUCH less than anywhere else.
    • Deadwood
      10L1000 anyone with High Mileage ? I hate Damocles....

      By Deadwood · Posted

      New member here, very long time occasional guest. Saw this thread, thought it would be a good time to contribute someting. It is only my experience and not a claim that everyone will have the same.   I bought my '20 3500 L5P new and have put 99.9% (literally) of it's current ~400k miles on it myself, with over 50% of that towing loads between 4k to 15k, and to me this truck has been nothing short of amazing. For the first 235k I had zero issues, and from there until 321k I replaced a NOx sensor, two failing glow plugs, and three of the notorious injector connectors. I believe this truck is in part, a testament to good luck, but also good care and following a decent maintenance schedule (I also keep meticulous records.) As a result, it looks as good as a well cared for 70k rig, up and down, inside and out.   At some point before that 321k mile mark I began to get a little spooked about the 10L1000, especially the valve body. Word of mouth about potential issues prompted me to jump on the net to sift through all the noise and determine what all the fuss was about. I routinely take long trips, coast-to-coast and points in between, so roadside breakdowns can be '...a thousand miles from nowhere' and a bit of a challenge, and though I had no issues, my guard was up and activated.   And then I stumbled across a chance to salvage some parts off a new 2025 that had been wrecked in transport. I grabbed a few wear items (alternator, pulleys, etc.) and on a whim asked what the ten speeder would cost me. It was cheap...really cheap. I knew some changes had been made in the '24+ version 10L and were supposedly not compatible, but I called service/parts at my local Chevy dealer and asked why and they didn't know. A call to a well known aftermarket transmission outfit revealed it was very likely it would be fine, but to them not 100% sure.   Because it was cheap (really cheap) and I was spooked, I took the chance. Had it installed by a local shop and it worked like a champ, shifted just like the original. At it's first service at 37k, I had the shop put in a Next Gen valve body kit, which after some initial hiccups and rough shifts, smoothed out though with somewhat firmer shifting.   All that said, I have a very serious concern about my newer transmission as just two weeks ago it suddenly began to exhibit a strong reluctance to engage forward or reverse. It was a bit past due anyway so I took it in for service. The reason it was sticking was due to 'glitter' in the fluid clogging the filter...not good folks, often indicates a converter giving out. We ended up going ahead with the new filter and fluid, first to see if it would move and shift, and then if so buy me a little time. It did, and I've driven it over a thousand miles and it is shifting smooth, no noises or slipping. Regardless, it looks like a third gearbox is in my future so I can resume taking long trips with some confidence. In the very short term, my curiosity will have me examining the fluid to check how much glitter has reappeared.   An earlier poster had alleged, in the context of 10L100 failures, that it is another example of how we seasoned citizens somehow descend into hysteria, lose control of our senses, and react irrationally after brief encounters with the idiocy of the internet infosphere. Let me say (and I have used and abused said internet since it's infancy) there is no segment of the populace that has a corner on over-reaction to digital garbage. Just as my offering of experience in this arena is purely anecdotal and should not be considered gospel or all-encompassing, I believe it is still worthwhile information to consider, along with other relevant anecdotal experiences about things like complex transmissions, especially when balanced with other sources.   So to answer the original question, yes I got high miles out of my first 10L, trouble free for 321,000. Now I really wonder how much longer it would have went. Did I 'overreact' to the internet ghouls by replacing a 'good' one with a 'bad' one? Maybe. Who knows, the thing might have taken a puke a 100 miles later. So I'll just fix it again, then move on and start thinking about all the other stuff that will eventually wear out. It still has the original brakes (they're at ~60%), original injectors/pump, turbo, water pump, etc....pretty much original everything. Knock on wood.
    • swathdiver
      6 Speed vs 8 Speed

      By swathdiver · Posted

      At peak temperature.  They get to cool down and warm up more, especially those with the external cooler.  I have three GMT900s and one of them has over 225K on its original transmission.  Fluid gets changed about every 36K miles, all of it.     It's not the bean counters, it was the government.  They had to meet CAFE standards and other government requirements.   To get around that, we tune them and modify them to our liking.
    • GMCustomerService
      Will not stay in Reverse

      By GMCustomerService · Posted

      Our customers' safety isn't something we take lightly. To ensure you get the proper assistance for your truck's repairs, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.
    • GMCustomerService
      2026 Z71 Forward and Rear Park Assist help

      By GMCustomerService · Posted

      We appreciate you sharing your experience with your truck. To ensure we get you the proper assistance, please fill out the form at https://s.chevy.com/support-request with all pertinent details including your username.

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...