Jump to content

13b vs. v8

renesis

By renesis
in The Off-Topic Bar

Recommended Posts

renesis New Member

renesis

Posted
Posted

Hey, new here, got a mazda rx-8 and a chev truck. Juat wondering if you guys think the wankel is more efficient than a pushrod v8? I know the usual stuff like the v8 will have more torque, the rotary has better reliability, stuff like that, but what do you guys think??

facn8me Senior Enthusiast

facn8me

Posted
Posted

I think the v-8 Bigger=more potential. Although the rotory is a hella motor. It's kinda tough comparing apples and ornges. Being this is a truck site and the itty bitty rotary would not work at all in our trucks your gonna get v8 answers.

SnakeEyeSS Senior Enthusiast

SnakeEyeSS

Posted
Posted

potential? the rotary is 1.3L.......if you could make one as effecient and powerful at, say 5.3L, we'd watch the power output swallow the LS7. too bad they haven't been engineered enough to see their full potential(besides the 787B LeMans car).

 

It's kinda like the BMW inline 6. a few years back their then head engineer thought that I6's would take a back seat in the M3 to a V-8, as will happen in the next generation M3, because they had maxed the potential of the I6.....but look now, they have a new magnesium block and redesigns which pulls another 28 ponies out of the now much lighter same size block......

 

what I'm saying is that the current 333HP M3 motor, if reworked with the new mag magic, might see close to 400 in street form(since they have some version running 350HP already), out of a 3 and a hlaf liter six cylinder.

 

 

same applies to the Smallblock, GM is stil suprising us. seeing the new 303 hourse Gen-IV 5.3L car engine.

 

but overall, the rotary is very promising, just not MPG-happy, which is why currently it's probably not being greatly pursued.

R Dogg 56 Senior Enthusiast

R Dogg 56

Posted
Posted

I have respect for the Felix Wankel rotary as it has been a design that has been around since 1955, the 12A model when it was introduced to the US in 1979, and the 13B in 1984. Although I'm not really a fan of the imports, I will say that the two cars I like are the Nissan Skyline and the Mazda RX-7. Everthing else just doesn't appeal to me. The RX8 is kinda growing on me though.

Friz Enthusiast

Friz

Posted
Posted

I had a race car a few years back with a 13b in it. The Wankels are cheap, reliable, really cheap to modify, and can make a buttload of horsepower. On the down side, they are really not fuel efficient at all, noisy as all get out if you open up the exhaust, and don't make low end torque at all.

If you have a small car (which is what the 13b is designed for), they are a lot of fun. I can't see anyone making one big enough for a serious truck motor, mainly due to the lack of fuel efficiency.

 

On our racecar, (a Mazda 808 body on a chopped, shortened, and lowered Datsun truck frame) we purchased a 13b from "The Rotary Doctor" in Southern California. That motor made 200 hp on the engine dyno. Doc said that rpm was safe up 13,000, but the power would begin to fall off at about 9,000.

That motor cost us $1000 in 1987.

Our main track rival drove a Ford Pinto (another mini stock favorite) and it cost him over $4,000 in trick parts to pass us.

 

If you can find a rotary motor in something that you might want to build a little street racer/ricer, my advice is to do it! They are a lot of fun!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • asilverblazer
      Slate Electric Truck

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      I like the idea.  I would pick diesel if I had a choice. I need pictures though.
    • newdude
      Help purchasing a touch screen digitizer

      By newdude · Posted

      I've installed cheap eBay new aftermarket digitizers before.  They work.  Did a bunch of Cadillac CUE (aka Cadillac's MyLink) for someone years ago.  They all worked fine after the repair.    That number 22740886, that is a component part # for GM.  You can use it to search, but its not something that's obtainable at the dealer level.     So pretty much any of these will work - 2015 Colorado Digitizer for sale | eBay
    • asilverblazer
      give me some tips to make my truck look better

      By asilverblazer · Posted

      Black bumper and the later years Z-71 style color matched grille.
    • fondupot
      Exhaust heat while towing!

      By fondupot · Posted

      You can install tailpipes that direct the exhaust sideways vs the OEM one that goes straight back. There are several on the market, do you own research. HOWEVER, you need to make sure the Venturi vents are still intact, otherwise it will throw a engine code. There is a sensor somewhere that detects back pressure on the exhaust. And if it doesn't collect the correct metrics, it will throw the truck into limp mode. 
    • Atlas
      Wow I'm in a pickle. (Broke down truck) and a story.

      By Atlas · Posted

      "Teardown" is complete. Head surfaces are clean and ready, new intake is prepped and ready. Coolant drained and water pump is removed, radiator is removed, new hoses and pump are ready.   The replacement intake is also from a '95 (with I think 260k, the odometer said). Noticeably less pitting where it covers the rear coolant passages. I'm not sure if that's a tribute to more frequent use, more frequent coolant changes/upkeep, or if the intake was machined at some point. But it appears I found a good one.   My coolant hoses were original, and the lower hose still retained the factory spring inside. It's not really rusty, but it's got deposits all over it. Unsure if I should re-install it (will thoroughly clean it first). Someone said hose technology has gotten better since 1995 (has it?) and I don't need the spring. I think modern EPDM is what made those hoses last from 1995-2026, so it's a question of how much suction can the water pump really pull, and will it collapse the hose without a spring?   I'm stopped and waiting for parts, however.   When I first brought the truck home, the fan was intermittently hitting the radiator shroud. I could see someone had monkeyed with the shroud (put a bunch of cardboard as a spacer between the upper/lower shroud halves. Someone said the motor mounts have likely failed and the engine has sagged. I wasn't sure I believed that. The engine is really solid in its mounts: To remove the old intake I *just* nearly permanently welded to the heads with freshly cured RTV and gasket snot two weeks ago, I literally had to use the arms on my lift and a chain with a bolt attached to the intake to pull it loose. It almost picked the front of the truck off the ground before ....scuuuuuuuuuuup.... I could actually hear the gaskets tearing and it broke loose and the whole truck settled back down. Motor barely moved.   SO, those parts I'm waiting on... The lower radiator mounts/bushings had completely failed. The radiator needs to be insulated from the rad support, and the bushings help the rad stand at the correct height. The plastic "baffle" was also destroyed at some point. Someone had attached the shroud to it incorrectly, overlapping a joint that should have been underlapped, creating another suspect issue potentially causing things to hit the fan. Broken tabs, side is busted off, and it's perma-formed/bent where it was jimmied incorrectly.   The baffle? Unobtainum. Long since discontinued from GM, of course. Aftermarket/capa/chinese? Also unobtanium. In GM's infinite wisdom, it appears there are at least two different variations whether the Blazer is 2 or 4 door, and I can't yet tell if they shared the same part with the S-pickups. Plan B, if I can't find a viable used one, will be to create a bracket to re-assemble the critical joint I need to seal a gap with the shroud. But that will bug me, it won't be...perfect.   The water pump bolts appear to have been installed with...plumber's putty. I guess, sure, if it works...? I've found a few "backyard fixes" like that. Someone's been here before....   If I can't find someone to jam bamboo under my fingernails to fill my free time this week I think I'll install the driver's power window motor and replace the rear door speaker that's inop. I've got a genuine GM "9.5" ohm working replacement. Why GM used a non-standard resistance....nevermind. Of course they did, you can get more sound from a cheap factory amp that way.   And the saga goes on...

  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...