Jump to content

Banks PowerPAck for the 8.1L


Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't think you'll find many motorhome pilots on this forum. Read the page closely and you'll see what I mean. And besides, I'm getting more power than that with minor mods in the truck chassis. That's why Banks doesn't offer a "Power Pack" for the GM trucks.

 

Vernon

Posted
Check this out.....  50 hp and 58 ft/lbs

 

http://www.bankspower.com/test_results_AM10.cfm

 

DEWFPO

 

 

 

 

If you want to help your 8.1,

check with Wester's.

 

 

 

 

 

Westers is not the end all solution in HD motorhome use. I would not recommand headers for a motor home because they can add a LOT of heat to a already warm engine compartment. I good free flowing quiet exhaust system would free up some ponies and lower engine temps a bit too under heavy load because of quicker blown down and cooling of exhaust gases due to lower downstream restrictions.

Posted
Check this out.....  50 hp and 58 ft/lbs

 

http://www.bankspower.com/test_results_AM10.cfm

 

DEWFPO

 

 

 

 

If you want to help your 8.1,

check with Wester's.

 

 

 

 

 

Westers is not the end all solution in HD motorhome use. I would not recommand headers for a motor home because they can add a LOT of heat to a already warm engine compartment. I good free flowing quiet exhaust system would free up some ponies and lower engine temps a bit too under heavy load because of quicker blown down and cooling of exhaust gases due to lower downstream restrictions.

 

 

 

 

 

Well pardon me!

Is he wanting help for a camper or his truck?

Posted
Check this out.....  50 hp and 58 ft/lbs

 

http://www.bankspower.com/test_results_AM10.cfm

 

DEWFPO

 

 

 

 

If you want to help your 8.1,

check with Wester's.

 

 

 

 

 

Westers is not the end all solution in HD motorhome use. I would not recommand headers for a motor home because they can add a LOT of heat to a already warm engine compartment. I good free flowing quiet exhaust system would free up some ponies and lower engine temps a bit too under heavy load because of quicker blown down and cooling of exhaust gases due to lower downstream restrictions.

 

 

 

 

 

Well pardon me!

Is he wanting help for a camper or his truck?

 

 

 

 

 

It does not matter as headers can greatly increase under hood temps and in a NBS truck with a tight fit and limited airflow it would really get hot when working hard. GM learned years ago the 454 would eat/crack exhaust manifolds it heavy duty towing in tigh installations and switched to a stainless steel manifold long ago. Headers would greatly increase the surface area for the amout of gas being routed and greatly heat the underhood air even more under heavy loads. It could lead to all kinds of problems on a hot day.

Posted

Don't get too uspset over Snowman, he stands to correct everyone. It's not like you could have the headers coated with thermal barrier, eh Snow? There's more than one way to skin a cat.

 

Vernon

  • 2 months later...
Posted
Don't get too uspset over Snowman, he stands to correct everyone.  It's not like you could have the headers coated with thermal barrier, eh Snow?  There's more than one way to skin a cat.

 

Vernon

 

 

 

 

headers are better in all situations in my opinion, anyone who says otherwise has no experience with them at all

Posted
Check this out.....  50 hp and 58 ft/lbs

 

http://www.bankspower.com/test_results_AM10.cfm

 

DEWFPO

 

 

 

 

If you want to help your 8.1,

check with Wester's.

 

 

 

 

 

Westers is not the end all solution in HD motorhome use. I would not recommand headers for a motor home because they can add a LOT of heat to a already warm engine compartment. I good free flowing quiet exhaust system would free up some ponies and lower engine temps a bit too under heavy load because of quicker blown down and cooling of exhaust gases due to lower downstream restrictions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I said Wester's, that is not headers!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,840
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    appletrav
    Newest Member
    appletrav
    Joined
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 349 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
    • Probably not their first rodeo, so it should go as planned most likely.  Typically the service manager or tech doing the swap will put some seat time to shake it down after they get it all put back together.  We usually put 50-100mi before we hand them back so if something happens, its not after you get it.  A coolant leaks, oil leaks, a ground left off or loose, vibration, etc.     The new engines so far have been good?  There's been a couple that have popped out there again (the replacement engine) but most have been okay.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...