Jump to content

Odometer accuracy


Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently went from the factory 245/70/17 size to a AT 265/70/17.

 

I noticed the economy from the computer went down about 3-4 mpg.

I used my GPS to verify actual speed and I figured I was off about 1.7 mph on my speedo at 60.

 

I went to a friends shop and he recalibrated the computuer to the new tire size.

 

Immediatley, I did not see a change, then after the next time I shut the engine off and started driving again, I noticed the estimated economy was back where it had been originally smile.gif smile.gif smile.gif

 

SO, I took my GPS again and did a test of two different drives semi-constant speed and traveled 10 miles each time. Comparing the truck trip meter to the GPS, it shows that the GPS shows I have traveled about 1 to 1.2 tenths of a mile more than the trip meter shows, an average of both 10 mile test.

 

Where I live here in Texas, the WAAS feature does not provide better accuracy, so I keep it disabled. I know the GPS is not perfect nor is the truck's odometer.

 

But at the rate of about a 1% error, or 1 mile per 100 miles traveled, I think I can say with confidence that both ways of measuring are as accurate as can be expected and I should just call it good and don't worry about it. cool.gif

 

What do you guys think??

Posted

I just went from 235/75/16's to 235/85/16's and I noticed that my odometer is off a little. I don't really worry about it. I drove from Phoenix to San Bernardino (CA) the other day to visit family and the 330 mile trip only showed 323 miles. So, I lost 7 miles somewhere and I took the route I always take. Not sure if it's worth getting the computer reprogrammed. The tire diameter is about 2 inches bigger but the same width.

Posted
I just went from 235/75/16's to 235/85/16's and I noticed that my odometer is off a little.  I don't really worry about it.  I drove from Phoenix to San Bernardino (CA) the other day to visit family and the 330 mile trip only showed 323 miles.  So, I lost 7 miles somewhere and I took the route I always take.  Not sure if it's worth getting the computer reprogrammed.  The tire diameter is about 2 inches bigger but the same width.

 

 

 

 

 

I would not have had mine reprogrammed either had my friend not offered to do it for free.

 

I just wonder how accurate mine was to start with

Posted

I would not have had mine reprogrammed either had my friend not offered to do it for free.

 

Not reprogramming after a tire change or gear change will affect fuel economy, engine performance, trasns shifting, ABS & SDM/airbags.

Posted

From the factory these speedometers aren't too accurate. Infact, my dad just put 265/75-16's on his 2500HD to replace the 245/75-16's and his speedometer now is reading closer to the GPS value than it was before.

Posted

The speedometer/odometer on my 05 is reading about 5% off and I have the stock tires on it.

 

Not very accurate at all!

 

DEWFPO

Posted

I really hope it's not because someone figured out that they could ring up the miles 5% faster than they are actually acrruing getting owners out of their warranties 5% sooner thereby saving GM $X on 1 million trucks a year. I really hope that's not the case. But from what I've heard on this forum, nobody's speedometer/odometer reading are correct from the factory. And they're all reading in GM's benefit, none the other way. Makes you wonder.

 

DEWFPO

Posted
I really hope it's not because someone figured out that they could ring up the miles 5% faster than they are actually acrruing getting owners out of their warranties 5% sooner thereby saving GM $X on 1 million trucks a year.  I really hope that's not the case.  But from what I've heard on this forum, nobody's speedometer/odometer reading are correct from the factory.  And they're all reading in GM's benefit, none the other way.  Makes you wonder.

 

DEWFPO

 

 

 

 

It would also show better fuel economy, not saying that's true, but if it is...... You also have to remember that the tires on these trucks have thick tread. If the speedo is calibrated with brand new tires on it will be different than if the tires were bald. Lets say the tires are 32" with full tread. If you figure an inch of tread loss 1/32 * 100 would equal 3.12%. The tires would be smaller so they would spin faster and cause your speedo to show a faster speed/more miles than stock.

Posted

The variation allowed by the government is +- 7 mph and due to tires not being consistant in size (air pressure) there will be some differences in MPH. That is why law inforcment cannot legally give you a ticket for speeding for less than 7 MPH. My current truck has 30000 mi and GPS says its right on at 70 mph. Different tire brands will make a difference too.

Posted

Comparing my '05's speedometer with my GPS and OEM tire sizes at 35 PSI, my readings are dead-on.

Posted

It's nice to know they slip and get it right every once in a while.

 

My 2500HD is stock with only 3,900 miles and two different radar guns have me running 52 mph when the speedometer is registering 55 mph on the dash.

 

DEWFPO

Posted
The variation allowed by the government is +- 7 mph and due to tires not being consistant in size (air pressure) there will be some differences in MPH. That is why law inforcment cannot legally give you a ticket for speeding for less than 7 MPH. My current truck has 30000 mi and GPS says its right on at 70 mph. Different tire brands will make a difference too.

 

 

 

 

 

That's right, I forgot about that too! :cheers:

Posted
The variation allowed by the government is +- 7 mph and due to tires not being consistant in size (air pressure) there will be some differences in MPH. That is why law inforcment cannot legally give you a ticket for speeding for less than 7 MPH. My current truck has 30000 mi and GPS says its right on at 70 mph. Different tire brands will make a difference too.

 

 

 

Is that a federal vehicle code that applies to any and all law enforcement jurisdictions? I ask because I'm sure I've read/heard about folks getting radar tickets for 5 mph over... :eek:

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.4k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,837
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    bellssn690
    Newest Member
    bellssn690
    Joined
  • Who's Online   4 Members, 2 Anonymous, 554 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Interesting, I suspect I would have fueled up in Lee Vining as the day prior I would have filled up either in Laughlin or near there and maybe again before I entered Death Valley and once out the other side late that evening as I kept on driving into the night up near Lee Vining. Next morning I most likely fueled up in LV before heading over Tioga Pass into ( as I refer to it as "Yose .... Mite" 😁 ). And again that was 19 years ago but the price then must not have jumped out at me like the 5 bill a gallon theme of nutty cult hippy country Big Sir or head so far up their rear Aspen. I'd be curious to know where the highest prices are in the lower 48, I probably would not be far off to guess somewhere in Cali forn ie. Coldfoot and Prudhoe bay may have those prices beat but that is a whole other world up there and when prices are more normal elsewhere that is about what they can be up there I believe in no mans land. Anyway interesting that the 395 corridor is hosing people and the thing is, its tourist season and its not like there are a lot of competition options when driving up that highway from what I could see. Yup, big ole Boaterhomes and various other RV's ahead and behind me at the Yosemite entrance gate and they have to get their fuel somewhere.  
    • Those can be high, as well as the big California cities. The ones that will pop your eyes out are the 395 corridor on the Eastern side of the Sierra Nevadas. Lee Vining, $7.19 for regular and $8.89 for diesel is what the Google said right now.
    • Correct.  2019-2021 model years are serviced by a different p/n.  19420611.  Recall 2021s use 19420611.   The recall engines 2022-2024 model years are serviced with 12740076.     The difference between 19420611 and 12740076 is GM changed injector size for 2022.  The injectors are smaller on 12740076 with smaller injector bores in the cylinder heads to match the smaller injectors.  So you can't install a 19420611 in a 2022-2024, and you can't install a 12740076 in a 2019-2021.     Both engines are the replacement engine p/ns that are in the L87 recall.  So both of these are the updated engines.     Here's a version of the L87 recall with the p/ns for all the parts needed.    RCRIT-25V274-7075.pdf   Note it shows 19420611 and 12740076 with an asterisk to a footnote "Use the VIN and the GM Electronic Parts Catalog (EPC) to determine which part to order if two or more part numbers are listed for the same part, as it may vary by vehicle options."    
    • Looking for advice from this group. Took my flawless 2020 6.2 TB to an unnamed shop for routine rear brakes and oil change. Tech forgot to put oil back in after the full service and needles to say, destroyed my engine.  It’s all on their shop video so they are responsible.   I had my Chevy dealer do the analysis and they confirmed its compromised and said engine replacement. The manager said they only get GM reman engines from GM with full 3 yr warranty and the one they would put in is not same as what’s they are swapping out on 21-25 for recall.    I am looking for advice why that would be a different engine because obviously I had the good 6.2 year and replacing it has my concerns with that recall for 21-15   Also what’s the pros and cons of accepting the engine swap vs telling the shop that bricked the truck to pay up so I buy a new truck. I’m concerned about stigma resale eventually if I just decide to get rid of it after the swap or other issues showing up after the swap out.  
    • Just looked up my records.  I've never gone over 5000 miles between oil changes.  At 46K miles, I have 10 oil changes.  I hope that will help.  I also installed the disabler last year.  I've still had a few times when it didn't seem to engage (which I can tell because the start stop feature kicks in), but for the most part, I think it's working.  For some reason, GM did not include the number of cylinders running in the information screen like I had on other models.  In my Cadillac, it shows me when it's running on 4 cylinders on the fuel milage screen.  I can't find that on my '21 Denali.
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...