Jump to content

a question about leasing a vehicle


76BBSub

Recommended Posts

Posted

hey guys im a new guys here pretty cool website. ok i have a question when the lease is up on a vehicle. lets say i lease a new vehicle for 3 years after the 3 years is up and it time to take it back to the dealer do i or dont i get any money for that vehicle i dont think you do since i dont really own the vehicle. if i dont get any money for it after the lease is up i have the option of buying it right for what ever the vehicle is worth but if i dont buy i would have to but a down payment down on a new vehicle. just wondering thats all thinking about leasing a new vehicle and just wondering about somethings thats all. :confused:

Posted

Hi Jason, welcome to the site!!!

Leasing, is an effective way to lower your monthly payments. The downfall is that after the term of the lease you own nothing.

Usually you pay monthly payments, and when the term is over you have one of two choices. You give the vehicle back, or you payout a substantial amount and buy the vehicle.

IMHO, leasing is really not the way to go. Yes, it lowers your monthly payment by alot, but in the end you pay much more than you would if you bought it, if you decide to keep it.

Posted

Mervz is exaclty right.  The only advantage to leasing is that you would be able to drive a vehicle with more options on it that you might not be able to afford if you were to buy it.

If you were to put alot of "hard" miles on your vehicle then you might want to consider a lease because you probably wouldn't want it when you are done with it.

Be careful though because if you have a lease and go over the allotted milage then it becomes very expensive, because you have to pay big a substantial penalty for every mile over the lease that you put on that car/truck!!!

Posted

The other thing is that part of the lease agreement usually specifies the residual value of the vehicle, or what it will be worth when you are finished with it.  This assumes normal wear and tear, and that you don't exceed them mileage limits.  Check with your lease company, but I beleive that you can purchase the lease car at the end of the lease for the agreed residual value.

Jeff

Posted

My biggest argument against a lease is that,like stated before,the vehicle depreciates rapidly and on a lease your balance stays fairly high.

I have known three people that ended up with problems from insurance companies because they don't want to pay that much to pay off the vehicle.

It shouldn't be this way but it does happen.

Welcome aboard!

Posted

Welcome to the site bowtiefan.  With a handle like that, you should fit in well here!  (Not that other handles don't.)

As far as leasing a vehicle, I've never liked the idea of it because like mentioned before, after the lease, you own nothing.  If it's something you know your not going to keep and it's just transportation until you save up, find, or get what you really want (whatever the case may be), then the lower payments mught be a good idea.  

Posted

I have a buddy with a '00 Ranger ext. cab 4x4 4.0L. He has a 2 year 48,000 mile lease and he pays ? a month! I think it is outrageous. We argue all the time about it. He says he owns it, but I say he doesn't. He says a lease comes out cheaper in the end if you buy it out, I think he is wrong. He says after his two years, the payoff is only ?,000. I think he must be missing something, cuz he said the price of the truck was around ?,000. How does that work out?

460x24=11040

25000-11040=13960

13960-2000(down payment)=11960???????????????

How can they lease it to him with no interest actually. Maybe I'm missing something, but it doesn't make sense to me how they can pretty much sell it to you for 0 interest. Can someone please explain. Sorry so long.

Thanks

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • No.   That would be an LT and higher trim.  Passive entry.   WT and Custom do not get this feature.  
    • Mediocre, how much did they lose on the poorly conceived EV strategy?   I wonder how much the stock price is being 'inflated' by all the buy-backs?   Cadillac literally looks like a brand without a rudder, no clear goals or product direction - performance or luxury? I guess performance because we can throw a small block in whatever we can and call it a day. Certainly not luxury when a Denali or High Country is reasonably cross shoppable. The Celestiq - no way - no vehicle can command quarter million prices when something wearing the same badge is on the buy here pay here lot across town.   Notice the 'base' Escalade doesn't even come with the 'leather-appointed' seating surfaces.   Hummer EV - fail Silverado EV - fail Sierra EV - fail Bolt/Volt EV (The most successful EV cancelled, restarted, cancelled, whatever its current status it)   Hybrids - none Sedans - none Medium duty - not anymore Minivan - none Coupe - none Convertible - none CUVs - 20+/-   6.2 Recall that landed squarely on the GMs highest seller - and specifically the fattest margin higher trims of the Yukon, Escalade, et. al. The most critical product line they fumbled big time. In the Escalade segment, are those buyers forgiving GM for a bad engine and patiently waiting for the fixes and dealing with the headaches? Nope, they dump them and go straight to the other premium brands.   In the ENTIRE GM portfolio how many aspirational vehicles are there? Corvette, Escalade (quickly being superseded by the obvious better value Denali)...   I posted somewhere else... what if Cadillac left the luxury game and became a performance brand similar to AMG or (gasp) Ferrari? Cut all the entry-level and base models from their line up and focus on the V-series or Blackwing or whatever they call it now. Of course, those would have the pre-requisite luxury and technology as standard equipment. This opens the floor for Buick to step in/up as the luxury brand (like they are in China), no 'performance pretenses' get rid of the 'entry-level' models with equally 'entry-level' power trains and become the Maybach to Cadillacs AMG. With those two brands effectively out of the way Chevrolet, the 'entry-level' brand has the floor to itself and GMC can take over as 'professional grade'.    Now each brand has a focus, no in-fighting, clear direction, and customer targets.   Just need to sneakily slide Corvette into the Cadillac brand and dump the vestigial script writing.
    • I can't get enthusiastic about the 1.5T (or the 1.3 or the 1.2), I won't drive a CVT. But the stupid things sell in volume.
    • There is a big difference in motorcycles and vehicles - nobody needs a motorcycle, they WANT one. That WANT is the most powerful force to drive price upwards.   I've hated every iteration of the Equinox, a prime example of GM laziness. It excelled at absolutely nothing, barely competitive by every metric. At least the latest generation looks decent.    I want to like the Buick Envista, but that pitiful engine plus FWD only is a BIG NO for me, I don't care how good it looks.
    • For as much hate as Ms. Barra receives on here, she sure is a shrewd businesswoman....
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...