Jump to content

Limited slip vs. locker


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi guys, my truck is only 2wd, but I thought I might get more help posting this in here, anyways, I found that in the rain my Silverado isn't much better than my old S-10 and so I was wondering should I just install a limited slip or go with a used factory locker unit out of a newer Silverado? My truck is a 04 4.8l ext cab short bed with 3.42's. Thanks.

Posted

The "factory locker" out of a silverado IS a limited slip unit. None of our chevys came with a true locking rear end.

 

A good limited slip diff is probably what your after.

 

Steve

Posted

You can check your RPO codes on the glove box sticker. Look for a (I beleive) a G80, which is the locker(which sounds like you DONT have) or G86 the limited slip. If anything, Id go with a Limited Slip. Lockers can perform alot worse on wet pavement.

Posted

If I'm not mistaken you can upgrade your existing axle. You don't have to replace it. Anybody know?

Posted

It depends what you want. Considering its a 4x2, I very much doubt you plan on doing any serious off-roading with it, so Id say you would be better with a limited-slip.

A locker is a waste unless you plan on using it for some serious off-roading.

Posted

IMO the G80 locker is the best way to go for low speed traction (like you would need off road), but the Limited slip is better for all around street traction (just not as good as the locker at low speed).

Posted
You can check your RPO codes on the glove box sticker. Look for a (I believe) a G80, which is the locker(which sounds like you DONT have) or G86 the limited slip.  If anything, Id go with a Limited Slip. Lockers can perform alot worse on wet pavement.

 

 

 

 

 

I have the G80 and its not a true locker. Its a limited slip. you get one wheel off the ground and it will spin. I have never heard of G86.

 

The following are the only RPO's I am aware of (I could be wrong):

 

GK9 Rear Axle: 4.63 Ratio

GTY Axle Wide Track

GT4 Rear Axle: 3.73 Ratio

GT5 Rear Axle: 4.10 Ratio

GU4 Rear Axle: 3.08 Ratio

GU6 Rear Axle: 3.42 Ratio

G80 Rear Axle: Positraction

HC4 Rear Axle: 4.56 Ratio

HC7 Rear Axle: 5.13 Ratio

 

Chevy does not make a true locker available as a stock option for our trucks.

 

Steve

Posted

OK, I was doing a bit of research and I found the G86 code. Sorry! :tear:

 

It looks like pre 2003 G80's are limited slip and 2003 and later G80's are being called lockers. G86 started in 2003 (as far as I can tell) as the code for the limited slip.

 

I still question the fact that GM is calling the 2003 and later G80 a locker! My dad has an 03 with the G80 RPO code and it sure acts like a limited slip.

 

 

Steve

Posted

Well The G80 that is in production now, is a true locker. It is automatic, and will slip some until it locks in (the difference in rpms is what activates it, and I think it is approx 100 rpm difference). Once it locks in, it is no different than a locker that is activated with a switch.

 

It is the same thing that is in the colorados (like I just traded). Trust me once it locks in, there is a huge difference between it and a limited slip (for snow traction anyway, I've not used it elsewhere).

Posted
You can check your RPO codes on the glove box sticker. Look for a (I beleive) a G80, which is the locker(which sounds like you DONT have) or G86 the limited slip.  If anything, Id go with a Limited Slip. Lockers can perform alot worse on wet pavement.

 

 

 

 

 

They called it a locker but it is not one. It is a limited slip and a play on words. GM uses two types of LSD's, the Gov Lock and the Eaton LSD which are both friction clutch based. Some models offer a selectable E locker which is the best of both worlds here. I would never recommand a Detroit sytle locker for street as it cannot power both wheels are different speeds and can effect handling.

Posted

I've never seen a limited slip work when you really need it, but they are the cheapest option and do help some. If you don't mind spending a little money, I would go with a selectable locker (E-Locker or ARB Air Locker). I did run a Lockright for a few years and loved it, just had to put up with the chirping tires. I have the G80 now and it is worthless, the bad part is that now that I have it, I have to change my carrier to put an aftermarket locker in.

Posted
During lockup, a self-energized clutch system causes a cam plate to ramp against a side gear. This ramping action compresses those disc packs mentioned earlier. The ramping continues until both axles - and therefore both wheels - are spinning at the same speed. This is full lock, and it prevents any further wheel slip. (Note: Axle lockup can only occur at speeds below 20 mph.)

 

The above quote is from this site.

 

If it is a limited slip and not a locker, then the Eaton is misrepresenting their product. According to eaton it fully locks up.

Posted
During lockup, a self-energized clutch system causes a cam plate to ramp against a side gear. This ramping action compresses those disc packs mentioned earlier. The ramping continues until both axles - and therefore both wheels - are spinning at the same speed. This is full lock, and it prevents any further wheel slip. (Note: Axle lockup can only occur at speeds below 20 mph.)

 

The above quote is from this site.

 

If it is a limited slip and not a locker, then the Eaton is misrepresenting their product. According to eaton it fully locks up.

 

 

 

 

 

 

They are mis quoting its function as it is friction based. I know the GovLoc well and it has been around for over 30 years now but it is not a true locker. A true locker has a mechanicly slpline/tooth engagement that cannot slip. When a govloc engages it can bang sometimes as clutch grab but power transfer is clutch limited (the bigger the rear axle the bigger the clutches and the more power transfer possible) Myself I never cared much for the clunky operation of the GovLoc nor it inabilty to lock up past about 20 MPH.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 391 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
    • First off you mentioned "Toyo Says" and then gave the pressures 45/50, was this some person at the tire shop that pulled those numbers out of his head ?   Now of course I can't know your exact axle weights front and rear, however I have much the same pickup as yourself other than not knowing your starting weight as per the pounds the truck rolled out of the factory at due to the options yours did or didn't come with or what you have added beyond the extra tire weight. The correct way to know 100% where a person is at is by weighing each axle with the typical weight the vehicle is driven with and that means taking into account passengers and making sure you figure in a full tank of fuel and a little grace for whatever you may put in the bed "groceries" !    I am looking at and not that it really matters as all the tire companies use the same charts anyway, but I am looking at the comprehensive Toyo tire chart in the section that your tire falls under and I know it sounds confusing but your tire is not an LT metric tire like your factory tire but instead because its a standard inch measured tire its under a different category called an LT floatation series tire. That makes a difference as LT metric tires they don't want to see run below 35 psi at highway speed where as with the LT floatation series it can be run down to 25 psi on the highway as long as the weight on the said size of tire is agreeable with or less than that minimum 25 psi. It blows many people away that how is this physically possible, an empty truck for one thing and larger tires with the same size wheel diameter have a lot more air volume so they can carry the same weight as the smaller tire with less air pressure.    So my truck, I have the stock 275/65R20 wheels and tires and I have a bit of weight in the box with a bak flip cover and a rubber bed mat and some tools and spare gas. The front of my gas truck weighs a bit more than some trucks of the similar spec due to double batteries and alternators. However with full fuel and just me in the truck I am weighted such that I can run 40 front and 35 rear and so that is what I have done since day one.    If I base your truck at or slightly below the weight of my truck, in theory with your tires going by the tire chart you might be right around a minimum of 30 pounds front and 25 pounds rear. Of course that would hit pretty much minimum cold inflation pressure one could run with that tire size and a near empty truck. If you have access to an accurate weigh scale to do individual front and rear axle weights I would suggest you do that and make sure your topped up with fuel and whatever else in the truck before you weigh it and then you will have a great starting point to work off of and figure out what your bare minimum pressures are you can safely run. If you do much in the way of hot weather high speed driving, bumping up a bit for a safety margin is never a bad idea but just depends on what type of driving you do. I will include the Toyo chart and the floatation series sizes start on page 31. Without a doubt at these pressures I am speculating at minimum wise for your truck, it would most certainly ride very different then it did when you were using 55 lb front and rear.     https://www.toyotires.com/media/pxcjubjs/application_of_load_inflation_tables_20200723.pdf
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...