Jump to content

thinking about building my rear


Recommended Posts

Posted

again, i'm a mustang guy and have had this truck for a only a couple weeks, so excuse my ignorance. i'm wondering what rear i have in my truck (02 silverado with the 4.8) and what my options are for building it. what do the chevy trucks respond to the best? locker or posi? i have a eaton posi in my mustang and love it. what about axels?

 

thanks for your help

 

Dave

Posted

Have a look in your glove box....listed there are a bunch of codes.

Your axle ratio and type of axle will be listed there.

For a list of codes, check out:

http://www.wiu.edu/users/muwtj1/gq1-j55.txt

 

For example, a 3.73 axle would be code 'GT4', while a locking diff code is 'G80'.

Good luck!

Posted

"Mine" has a stock 3.73 Eaton POSI, the previous owner says it works great. For serious offroading I would bet that nothing works better than a nice ARB Airlocker. Does gearing need to be changed if you go with bigger wheels and tires(as in the size for a lift kit, so I guess 35-38)?

 

Mike

Posted
Does gearing need to be changed if you go with bigger wheels and tires(as in the size for a lift kit, so I guess 35-38)?

 

 

 

 

It's my understanding for that size you'll have to go a 4.10.

My opinion of course.

The PCM would definitely have to be 'told' there's different size tires. ;)

Posted

There are all kinds of ratio/tire swap calculators out there 35's could probably get away with 4.10's 38's you are going to need 4.56 or 4.88's or you can just have no power theres always give and take have fun

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...