Jump to content

Rear diff drain plug


Recommended Posts

Posted

So everywhere I read says that I should of been able to just change the fluid the same way I did the front. Empty it out the drain plug and fill it back up. My rear diff doesnt have a drain plug....I thought they all had it. Something change in 05? So there I was at 10 pm cleaning up the cover and waiting for the silicone to tack up, didnt have a gasket since I wasnt expecting this. :banghead:

 

Who else has done this to an 05?

Posted
So everywhere I read says that I should of been able to just change the fluid the same way I did the front.  Empty it out the drain plug and fill it back up.  My rear diff doesnt have a drain plug....I thought they all had it.  Something change in 05?  So there I was at 10 pm cleaning up the cover and waiting for the silicone to tack up, didnt have a gasket since I wasnt expecting this. :banghead:

 

Who else has done this to an 05?

 

 

 

 

 

It, along with the tranny drain plug and some other things got dumped in the '03 model year update.

 

I did it the old fashioned way, too. Took forever to get all that gasket off.

Posted

Yours wouldn't be the first, GM I think has been phasing the rear axle drain plug out for some time. My friend had a '95 TA that didn't have a rear drain plug. Of course, we were swapping differential covers anyway (put a cast aluminum one on instead of the stamped steel), but yeah...woulda been cleaner w/a drain plug.

Posted
Yours wouldn't be the first, GM I think has been phasing the rear axle drain plug out for some time. My friend had a '95 TA that didn't have a rear drain plug. Of course, we were swapping differential covers anyway (put a cast aluminum one on instead of the stamped steel), but yeah...woulda been cleaner w/a drain plug.

 

 

 

 

Can you imagine the savings on eliminating drain plugs form the transmission and rear differential covers? :banghead:

Posted
Yours wouldn't be the first, GM I think has been phasing the rear axle drain plug out for some time. My friend had a '95 TA that didn't have a rear drain plug. Of course, we were swapping differential covers anyway (put a cast aluminum one on instead of the stamped steel), but yeah...woulda been cleaner w/a drain plug.

 

 

 

 

Can you imagine the savings on eliminating drain plugs form the transmission and rear differential covers? :banghead:

 

 

 

 

 

And the money they make (or provide to the industry period) when everyone has to buy a new gasket every time...Yeah I can imagine it. I still think it's retarded, even if it helps them save money.

Posted
Yours wouldn't be the first, GM I think has been phasing the rear axle drain plug out for some time. My friend had a '95 TA that didn't have a rear drain plug. Of course, we were swapping differential covers anyway (put a cast aluminum one on instead of the stamped steel), but yeah...woulda been cleaner w/a drain plug.

 

 

 

 

Can you imagine the savings on eliminating drain plugs form the transmission and rear differential covers? :banghead:

 

 

 

 

 

(Assuming you were being sarcastic, PM26)

 

I'm guessing you're not an engineer or in product development. :banghead:

 

You would be surprised...modifying the transmission pan and rear axle to remove the threads, and taking two different drain plugs out of inventory, along with the time (however short you may think it is) to install it makes a HUGE difference when you're dealing with thousands of assemblies per year.

 

Cost reduction progams within a company are the only way companies will make their profits in the competitive (and quickly saturating) market of automobiles. The real winner in the long run is the company that can capitalize on cost savings without sacrificing product quality...not easy to do.

 

-Steve

Posted

Well, a couple of things. Yes, I was being sarcastic. So cost cutting measures are important. I used to own a '95 Nissan 4X4 V6 pickup. It had 8 drain and fill plugs - yes eight of them: 2 on each differential, 2 on the transfer case, and two on the transmission (5 speed manual). Changing the fluids on that truck was a pleasure. Changing the transmission fluid and rear differential oil on this '06 Chevy truck is a nightmare. A dealer or an independent shop will probably charge one hour labor at $ 90 just to remove the covers and scrape of the old gaskets. Who is saving money now? $ 5 in savings for GM now translates to a $ 180 loss for the owner. Of course the customer has a choice: he can upgrade, at his expense to a nice after market finned aluminum covers for a mere $ 500 and "save" money in the long run.

And the most important thing is: why do they assume that their customers will keep buying their product when they pull cheap stunts like that? Eliminating a drain plug from the transmission and rear differential is an unbelievably stupid idea. I do not believe an engineer could come up with something like this. Some been counter, maybe.

Maybe they think that the customer is stupid and does not notice these little things like absence of drain plugs, crooked bracket on the hitch receiver electric plug, uneven gaps between front fenders and doors, shaking hood because of wrong adjustment

of the stops, scrubbing tires at 3000 miles because somebody blew off the alignment procedure at the factory, gurgling sound coming from the A/C vents, whining bearings on serpentine belt idlers, lack of wheel well liners in the back, no factory splash guards on a 4X4 truck, etc, clunky driveshafts, defective intermediate steering shafts,. Wrong! I seriously doubt I will be buying another GM truck. The quality is simply not there.

Posted
Well, a couple of things.  Yes, I was being sarcastic.  So cost cutting measures are important.  I used to own a '95 Nissan  4X4 V6 pickup.  It had 8 drain and fill plugs - yes eight of them: 2 on each differential, 2 on the transfer case, and two on the transmission (5 speed manual).  Changing the fluids on that truck was a pleasure.  Changing the transmission fluid and rear differential oil on this '06 Chevy truck is a nightmare.  A dealer or an independent shop will probably charge one hour labor at $ 90 just to remove the covers and scrape of the old gaskets.  Who is saving money now?  $ 5 in savings for GM now translates to a $ 180 loss for the owner.  Of course the customer has a choice:  he can upgrade, at his expense to a nice after market finned aluminum covers for a mere $ 500 and "save" money in the long run.

 

You have to remember that that is $5*100,000 (just for a figure) of $500,000 in savings for the manufacturer. Once it's out the door, they aren't really concerned with how much YOU spend to do the maintenance. Service shops are LOVING it, however.

 

And the most important thing is: why do they assume that their customers will keep buying their product when they pull cheap stunts like that?  Eliminating a drain plug from the transmission and rear differential is an unbelievably stupid idea.  I do not believe an engineer could come up with something like this.  Some been counter, maybe.

 

That's exactly the problem. The bean counters are in charge. That's why the GTO came to market and disappointed ALOT of people (myself included). That's also why alot of the parts on your truck aren't made in the USA.

 

Maybe they think that the customer is stupid and does not notice these little things like absence of drain plugs, crooked bracket on the hitch receiver electric plug,  uneven gaps between front fenders and doors,  shaking hood because of wrong adjustment

of the stops, scrubbing tires at 3000 miles because somebody blew off the alignment procedure at the factory,  gurgling sound coming from the A/C vents,  whining bearings on serpentine belt idlers,  lack of wheel well liners in the back, no factory splash guards on a 4X4 truck, etc, clunky driveshafts, defective intermediate steering shafts,. 

 

 

 

The fact that most of us who actually work on our own vehicles miss is that, yes, most of their customers don't realize these problems for a LONG time. Hell most of their customers would NEVER notice the drain plugs being removed. They could remove the engine oil drain plug and most people would never realize it until it cost them $3000 to change the oil (I'm being unrealistic, I know, but I believe my point is made).

Posted

figuring most people never change tranny of diff fluids, the lack of a drain plug is probably not noticed by 95 % of vehcile users.

 

my 93 GMC doesn't have any on tranny of diff, in fact I cant remember any GM vehcile I've owned having drain plugs on those two items.

Posted

Not having a drain plug isnt just a GM thing...

 

My 02 Dodge didnt have one

My 84,90,93, 97 and 2000 GM's didnt either.

My mother had a 86 ford tbird, no plug, my fathers 94 bronco didnt have one either.

 

Its just the way it is. Personally i would rather have to take the cover off. That way you can inspect the little magnet in there for chunks of metal that may be an early indicator of a problem.

 

Having to take it off saved my father from a major diff prolem on his 94 bronco. He was chenged the oil and noticed some metal chunks on the magnet. Those chunks were peices of his pinion bearing that was going south( never felt it driving). Since he caught it early it was a $200 bearing job vs a $1000 differential.

Posted

4X4 trucks are somewhat different. On these vehicles, changing the diferential oil is recommended at least every 30k miles, depending on the truck's use. If you are a serious off-road entusiast, you want your truck to have fill and drain plugs. Or when using your truck for heavy duty towing, you need to periodically change the rear differential oi. This is what we are talking about. I agree that on rear wheel drive cars and Suvs people never change the rear differential oil. that is not what we are discussing.

 

Also, properly designed drain plugs will have a built-in magnet to trap those metal shavings.

 

FWIW, my '69 6X6 deuce and a half has fill and drain plugs on all three differentials, and a large built-in magnet in the drain plugs. Working on that truck makes working on a Silverado look like a child's play. For one thing, each wheel weighs 200 lbs and the front wheel lug torque spec is 350 ft-lbs. The rear inner wheel lugs need 450 ft-lbs. The engine itself weighs 1600 lbs and holds 22 quarts of oil in the crankcase.

Posted
So everywhere I read says that I should of been able to just change the fluid the same way I did the front.  Empty it out the drain plug and fill it back up.  My rear diff doesnt have a drain plug....I thought they all had it.  Something change in 05?  So there I was at 10 pm cleaning up the cover and waiting for the silicone to tack up, didnt have a gasket since I wasnt expecting this. :cheers:

 

Who else has done this to an 05?

 

 

 

 

 

It, along with the tranny drain plug and some other things got dumped in the '03 model year update.

 

I did it the old fashioned way, too. Took forever to get all that gasket off.

 

 

 

 

The diff drain was lost in the '03 year, but the transmission drain is still on my 2003.

Posted

welp you undo the fill bolt suck the juice out and put new stuff in.

 

trannys get flushed.

 

i kinda like it keeps the shop floor cleaner.

 

i do agree it totaly sucks for the DIY though.

Posted

dont forget about them dumping the underhood light too

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • It is possible to add your own 12v outlet to your truck.  Check out this video:   I verified via GM Upfitters that pin 31 is the same on the 1500 trucks.  The wire is GM part number 84779405.   You can get the GM 12v outlet from Amazon  https://www.amazon.com/Genuine-Accessory-Receptacle-25774623-13549530/dp/B0F1H9YRGF EWAY 12 Volt Power Adapter for GM   https://www.amazon.com/EWAY-Chevrolet-Silverado-Cigarette-Ignition/dp/B0915RRW6Q/ref=sr_1_1?   I just haven't figured out a good place to put the 12v outlet in my truck.   Some people are getting USB-C to 12V adapters  https://www.amazon.com/WYMECT-Cigarette-Lighter-Socket-Adapter/dp/B0F87WNQKB/ref=sr_1_1_sspa? Not sure if they provide the correct amperage that a device like a tire inflator would need.  
    • Thanks; I looked there a few minutes, and I think I can find something. I really never looked there, as I thought it was stuff like PTO/aftermarket bodies/accessories like snow plows.
    • This is a 1/2 ton thing ONLY.  All HDs 2020-2026 have the two speed transfer case, with Autotrac as an option.     1/2 tons 2019-2026, regular 4x4s come with a single speed case (no 4LO!), and trucks with Z71 ordered, or all Trail Boss trucks come with the 2 speed case.  2 speed case is also an option on WT, and is also standard on High Country.  
    • 2013 5.3 still to this day calls for the PF48 filter.  Which as a 15psi bypass pressure.     There is a TSB, 17-NA-157 that talks about the PF-63 and PF-64 filters which have a higher bypass rating of 22psi.    TSB HERE - temp.xml   "Beginning in 2012, the oil pumps began to regulate main gallery feedback instead of pump out pressure. This means that the oil pump now does not begin to regulate until pressure is built up to the main gallery. This change reduces the amount of time it takes to provide oil to the engine bearing and lifters during extreme cold start conditions.  Main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are present on the following engine families which use Spin-on oil filters: Small Gas Engine (SGE), Large Gas Engine (LGE), High Feature (HFV6) Gen2 and Small Block Gen5 gasoline engines. These engines with the main gallery feedback oil pump control systems are factory built with an ACDelco® oil filters"   It also calls out what engines use those filters.  The gen 4 small blocks were not on that list (LMG, LC9, L9H, L92, L94, L20, L96).  Gen 5 small blocks use the higher pressure filter.          That all said...   Your 7045 Napa filter is the PF63 equivalent, with 22psi bypass.  You are already using the higher bypass pressure filter.  You CAN keep using it, you don't technically have to use it though.  
    • Do you know WHY the filter relief setting was increased to 22 psig?    When the new system goes into the second stage the pump volume ramps up considerably. It was found that the 15 psi filter bypass setting put the filter in bypass on a warm engine when the second stage was activated. Raising the filter bypass setting forced the filter to do what it designed to do. Filter. Preventing debris from circulating during high load, high rpm operation.    So next question is how did GM find this out? VLOM/lifter failures and a deep dive by Melling Corp.    Last question. Is it required? Look at it like this; a motor may be equipped with a rev limiter. But it only works if the set point in reached. That 22 psig setting only matters if the pressure differential across the filter media exceeds 15 psig during normal warm operation. Second stage kicks in around 3000-3500 rpm.    I can't answer your question because I don't know you and how you use the truck. But I think there is enough information here to let you decide for yourself. 😉
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...