Jump to content

MPG on a 94 4.3L full size 2wd


Recommended Posts

Posted

Looking at picking up a 94 1500, reg. cab, long bed. It has a 4.3L and auto trans.I was just wondering what to expect for mpg. and if it would be better than the 17 i am getting with my 05 crew cab. The crew cab is a lease so i want to keep the miles off it since i am getting laid off in a week or so and the company truck will no longer be my daily driver.

Posted

Let me put it this way: My fiancee`'s dad used to have a '93 with that same setup but was a 4x4. It had the big tank on it and he could drive a month back and forth to work and never put gas in it...and he was driving about 10 miles one way. Figure 25 working days x20 miles a day and you've got 500 miles, and you aren't empty. His truck also had an open pipe after the Y in the exhaust, so he had NO back pressure on that thing, so he coulda probably done better with an exhaust.

Posted

I was thinking it should get about 21 or so on the highway, which at 50 mph in my 05 crew cab i can get 19 - 21 on flat ground. I think the 94 has a 3.06 gear in it so even 25 mpg shouldnt be out of question. I just wanted to hear from those that have had a 4.3L in a full size. Thanks

Posted

1997 Chevy 1500 W/T 4x4 reg cab, long box, auto - 72000 miles

18.5 combined cty/hwy

20-21 Hwy at 68-72 mph

Can get about 650-680 miles on 1 tank

Haven't figured city driving yet

Posted
1997 Chevy 1500 W/T 4x4 reg cab, long box, auto - 72000 miles

18.5 combined cty/hwy

20-21 Hwy at 68-72 mph

Can get about 650-680 miles on 1 tank

Haven't figured city driving yet

 

 

 

 

Jeez. What size tank is that? I was under the impression all the V6s came with 24 gallon tanks. With my 24 gallon I can probably get about 320 before I decide to gas up.

 

I don't really have a gas gauge so I'm kinda afraid to go farther. While replacing the fuel pump, we must have either hooked up the harness wrong or something. Gauge hasn't worked ever since. It's my own fault for not checking things out before putting the bed back on. :shakehead:

 

18.5?? Wow..thats pretty good. Any aftermarket tunes or anything.

 

My 16 was with Magnaflow exhaust. Does age and mileage have that big of an effect on mpg?? I was pretty sure I was getting better mileage before I hit the 150k mark.

Posted
Jeez.  What size tank is that?  I was under the impression all the V6s came with 24 gallon tanks.  With my 24 gallon I can probably get about 320 before I decide to gas up.

 

18.5??  Wow..thats pretty good.  Any aftermarket tunes or anything.

 

My 16 was with Magnaflow exhaust.  Does age and mileage have that big of an effect on mpg??  I was pretty sure I was getting better mileage before I hit the 150k mark.

 

 

 

 

The tank on the long box full-size is 34 gallons. No tunes, just an ACDelco air filter and OEM fuel filter (changed every 15000 miles). I don't have cruise which I find gives me better mileage on the road. Hilly terrain and I more-or-less idle down hills. I have the 3.73 rear end and wondering what I'd get with a 3.42 or 3.08.

Posted
Jeez.  What size tank is that?  I was under the impression all the V6s came with 24 gallon tanks.  With my 24 gallon I can probably get about 320 before I decide to gas up.

 

18.5??  Wow..thats pretty good.  Any aftermarket tunes or anything.

 

My 16 was with Magnaflow exhaust.  Does age and mileage have that big of an effect on mpg??  I was pretty sure I was getting better mileage before I hit the 150k mark.

 

 

 

 

The tank on the long box full-size is 34 gallons. No tunes, just an ACDelco air filter and OEM fuel filter (changed every 15000 miles). I don't have cruise which I find gives me better mileage on the road. Hilly terrain and I more-or-less idle down hills. I have the 3.73 rear end and wondering what I'd get with a 3.42 or 3.08.

 

 

 

 

 

wow. I got the 3.42s on mine. Maybe its time for a light tune up.

Posted
wow.  I got the 3.42s on mine.  Maybe its time for a light tune up.

 

 

 

 

The owner before me told me he had a problem with the distributor getting condensation in it from an air conditioning line that was running over it. Rerouted and wrapped the line, changed the distributor and the O2 sensor, which has helped a lot.

Posted

The last fullsize I had with a 4.3 in it gave me 14-15 around town, 18-19 on the freeway, truck was a stripper '87 2wd, TBI, 700R4, 3.42's, A/C on. The thing was a pig! Couldn't get out of it's own way if it had to, using the A/C actually gave better mileage than having the windows down, but it was severely underpowered either way, with the mileage you're getting, I'd keep your current truck. Just my .02

 

Pat

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.5k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    342,903
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    RyGuy43
    Newest Member
    RyGuy43
    Joined
  • Who's Online   5 Members, 0 Anonymous, 522 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • This is NOT impact damage nor neglect. There were previous class action lawsuits because of such paint preparation st GM manufacturing plant. Not just the Cherry Red Color. This paint is applied in three processes to obtain the desired color.  The manufacturer will cover for 36 months or 36k miles only. That rust is actually corrosion because of the paint process failure. Corrosion is covered for 100,100 miles or a certain months. However their corrosion doesn't include this type. Go figure. Clearly manufacturer knew from previous paint issues. This started 3 weeks ago out of the blue.  
    • Is it time to put a piece of tape over the CEL? 
    • consider doing electrical testing?  I would guess some power or ground wire/connection has a problem.   alldata.com has wiring diagrams, connector pinouts and diagnostic procedures you can use to find where the problem is.
    • can you tell if the reader is actually trying to get codes, and the pcm is reporting none, or is your reader just silently failing because it's not communicating with the pcm?
    • Any joy with this truck seems to be short-lived.   The CEL for P0172 ("bank 1" too rich) is now "intermittent".   I'm not sure where to check, or re-check, and my energy to keep chasing problems with junk is wearing thin. The P0172 seems to set as I'm coming to a stop, completely off the throttle, when fully warm. At least, that's what it's done the 3? times it's set.   Everything appears normal on the scanner EXCEPT long term fuel trim. There's only one bank on this vehicle because it's an OBD 1.5 with only one upstream O2 sensor. At idle, it's around -16.4% and will dip to -18% occasionally at idle or off-throttle. LTFT approaches 0 when throttle is held at 2500rpm. Short term appears normal, much closer to zero all the time. The LTFT tells me the engine is running rich at idle but compensating at higher load. But, why?   The EVAP purge valve doesn't appear to be leaking/sucking fuel vapor continuously. Is it sticking just as I come to a stop and the engine is choking on fuel vapor and sets the P0172? But that doesn't explain the persistently negative LTFT. Disconnecting the purge valve doesn't seem to make any difference.   I suppose that leaves another dang issue with the fuel injector. A leaking fuel pressure regulator, a new leak in the spider, or a leaking fuel injector/poppet valve I didn't see, or a small crack in one of the spider legs.   The vacuum line leading to the fuel pressure regulator doesn't have raw fuel in it. It doesn't even smell like fuel when it's pulled off, not until you suck air through it, then you can tell it leads to a fuel component. I'd consider that normal? Nothing is signaling this is a FPR issue from the outside, at least.   The oil smells like fuel but it's not building volume. I've noticed most oil in most engines smells like fuel to some degree so it's hard to say if the smell is an issue or not. Or if the engine just still smells like fuel because the crankcase was full of it a few hundred miles ago. But it's been changed twice since that original issue of the leaking fuel line dumping fuel into the intake.   Patience is running very thin. Every win seems to be accompanied by two steps backwards, or another issue that leads to removing at least the top half of the intake manifold. Enough! LOL
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...