Jump to content

MAF Sensor


Recommended Posts

Posted

How long should a 2003 Silverado ECSB Z-71 (5.3L V-8 Non-flex-fuel) remain running if you unplug the MAF Sensor? I did this in my quest to figure out why my truck is running sluggish/missing/no power (see my other recent post...major engine problems). My truck stayed running for approx. 20 seconds with the MAF sensor unplugged...the engine did not change in the way it ran when I did this.

 

I think I have a bad MAF sensor. Would this be a fair assumption?

Posted

from what i have read when you disconnect the maf the engine should run differently as the ecm is not getting a reading from the maf. if the engine ran the same i would say the maf is bad. you may call the dealer and see if they can test it for you.

Posted

It is very possible, though it should give you an engine code if it is bad, I would trying cleaning the wires inside of the senosr, CRC makes a cleaner specifically for MAF's. If it does turn out that the MAF is bad, I happen to have a few brand new GM MAF's that just have scratches or dings and work perfectly if you are interested. I think they are about 210 bucks from GM, im sure I could get you a heck of a deal if that turns out to be your problem.

Posted
It is very possible, though it should give you an engine code if it is bad, I would trying cleaning the wires inside of the senosr, CRC makes a cleaner specifically for MAF's. If it does turn out that the MAF is bad, I happen to have a few brand new GM MAF's that just have scratches or dings and work perfectly if you are interested. I think they are about 210 bucks from GM, im sure I could get you a heck of a deal if that turns out to be your problem.

 

 

Thanks for the advice. Thats exactly what a ASE Certified tech friend of mine told me...so thats what I did. I cleaned the wires inside the MAF with the CRC MAF cleaner and still no change. Thats when he told me to unplug the MAF to test it that way...he said that if it is functioning the engine should run differently...but it didn't so I will go to GM today to get one. Thanks for the offer, but I think I am still going to get one here so they can calibrate it to my truck...I have the Truck VIN # and the numbers on the MAF itself.

 

Thanks again for the advice. I'll let everyone know how it goes.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • On the subject of OLM, Gm's OLM tool may be more "informed" than others brands. I recall OLM's in mid-2000's Chrysler products literally counting down a set number of miles. That's all the OLM appeared to be.    I would actually expect GM to be able to explain the parameters that their OLM takes into account from a high level. No, I would not expect them to disclose their software coding or data analysis around their parameters.   So we're talking about two different topics, so to continue the subject on the other one, I'd be curious to know how much "standard particulate matter" in fresh oil is able to be filtered at first start by a fresh oil filter. How much particulate matter is enough to "matter"?   I.e. how much of a "lever" do we think this equates to (variability in particulate content, in fresh oils, between different makes/brands, some which filter less, and some that filter more).   We can say that more particles = more wear = shorter engine life as a logical statement and use that data with a little marketing to scare people into selecting a more refined/filtered oil. Using a similie, is this like deciding to forego two alcoholic drinks in a lifetime because we're worried about the potential impact on lifespan? Are there numbers which translate the ISO test results into a quantifiable increase in wear for a given engine/use case?
    • I'm pretty sure it doesn't actually recalibrate the speedometer it just changes the wheel speed sensor inputs to the computer. The truck still thinks it has stock tires.
    • I apologize, I missed this post, at risk of going off CURRENT TOPIC.   I'm not saying it is BS, I'm questioning how much information is being held back. GM is NOT going to spell out exactly every parameter in the algorithm. Liability, intellectual property, etc.    I'm not naive enough to believe that it is as simple as revolutions, coolant temperature, miles, time; are you?    I don't do irrational either, and boiling the OLM down to four simple values that I could code in an afternoon (I'm not a coder) is irrational - unless it suits your agenda to ignore it. 
    • Chris 21 I appreciate your constructive response. !!  😉😉😉   The 6.6 is gas.  Correct me if I’m wrong but by recalibrating the speedo you’re correcting the shift points of the transmission on these trucks.?.
    • That is a huge misconception.     Bigger does not always equal safer.  Modifying does not make it safer either, with exceptions.   Think of this.  Your truck in stock form is capable of emergency maneuvers, proper stopping distances, its handling is designed around the factory wheel/tire packages, etc.   37s and a lift?  Now you've affected your braking distances, handling and ride control.  You've raised your center of gravity higher.  Your front visibility is now obstructed more than stock, same for your rear.  Does it look cooler?  Yes.  Does it now work as good as it did from factory on road?  NO.       As for my mention of exceptions?  Say you had a sedan or crossover.  They typically come with all season tires.  If you swap out for a performance all season or a summer tire, you improve your car by lowering its stopping distance (better braking because of traction) and improve the handling (regular and emergency) of the vehicle.  That is an actually improving modification.  My old 2019 LD 1500, I ran UHP all season tires on 20in wheels in a factory offered size.  It improved all aspects of how it drove over the Duratracs it came with from the factory in the stock 18" tire.  
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...