Jump to content

Looking for Bigger Tires and Wheels


Recommended Posts

Posted

Ok, I keep hearing that the biggest you can put on a 2001 2500 HD for tires is 285-75-16...Is this true....Guy at work just bought a new Ford 250 super duty and he is putting 35's on it...What is the biggest you can put on a GMC HD without a lift kit and just cranking the torsion bars....what do I need to get for rims??Keep hearing about backspacing.....Sorry, I am new to tinkering with my truck and am trying to learn......I was wondering how many threads everyone still has showing on there torsion bar bolts after they cranked them......Thanks....Joe

Posted

Welcome to the forum Joe...  Technically the stock wheels are being pushed to their limits if you run a 265/75/16, although many people are running 285's with no problems.

 

In most cases 285's will fit with either no cranking or minimal cranking of the T-bars.  Alot will depend on the configuration of your truck, and how it was set-up at the factory.

 

You may be able to go to a taller and skinnier tire with only minor trimming of the front air dam, but I'm not positive about that.

Posted

I have 285's on stock rims and they fit fine. I cranked the tbars to level it out, both front to back and side to side. If you go bigger you'll definitely need new rims, and I'd guess a lift. Some one had put 295's on there’s without a lift, but seeing how close the 285's are I personally wouldn't attempt it.

Posted

I have 305/70-16 on stock wheels and it works just fine.

I had to trim about 1 1/2" from the lower front of the inner fender panel. No cranking the torsion bars.

If you would like to see what it looks like, copy and paste

members.aol.com/jmisecsys

I have had this combination on stock wheels since 1994 and have had no problems and I get 50K miles at least out of the tires, rotating them every 5K miles.

Posted

305's Baby yeah!!No probs and they fit just fine on factory rims,and by the way this is the second truck I run 305's on factory rims,haven't had one problem yet including tire wear.Goodyear told me I would have no probs with the 305's on factory rims and they were right......Gun

Posted

Wow! 305's are even wider than 285's. I can't believe they fit ok on that 6.5" rim. The truck looks sweet Shotgun! I am also still deciding on tires, but I don't want problems with the Allison.

Posted

Shotgun,

     Have you had any problems with the ABS?  Do they function any differently?   Whats the difference on the speedometer?

 

Thanks,

           Frank

Posted

Frank,No probs at all with the ABS and yes speedo was a little off but corrected that with the hypertech programmerIII..Gun

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I mentioned this somewhere else recently but don't remember wher it went. I met a guy the other day who had a set of 305/75's on a truck that looked just like Shotguns only it was ext. cab. He didn't say how far exactly he cranked the torsion bars but he said he got about 2 inches out of it. He also trimmed (carefully) only the corners off of the air dam. His tires were mounted on 16x10 inch wheels. I am so positve his center caps said Westin but I can't seem to find anywhere that Westin even makes wheels  ???

 

I can not express enough how good this truck looked. I wish I could find those wheels. This guy also told me that his ride had improved by cranking his bars.   :flag:

In my experience I have never found this to be true. Thats why I haven't raised mine yet, but since I'll be under there changing oil tomorrow anyway I think I'll go ahead and give them a couple turns.

 

Nothing enhances a trucks looks like a set of wheels.

Posted

I've heard that cranking the torsion bars up a little improved the ride/handling too.  

I took my 2002 HD 6.0 in the other day to mount my 305/70/16 I just got. They wouldn't do it even if I raised the torsion bars. They said they WILL NOT FIT without "major cutting and trimming". I argued for a while then threw them in the back and left.

 

If 285's fit fine, the 305/70's are basically the same height but a little wider. it shouldn't take much to get them on.

 

I think I lift it anyways a little.

"8100HD"'s is looking real nice with the 3 inch body lift.

Posted
Hey Knuts the place you went to surely isn't the only game in town. Go somewhere else. Shotgun's pic is proof. If you squint and look real close at his pic you can see where he just cut away the corner of his air dam.
Posted
Yeah I hear you. I just wanted to be sure they'd fit and I'll go somewhere else anyways. Just waiting on the body lift. I've been told the '02 isn't "approved" yet. Although I believe its the same as an '01.
Posted
Sears has the 285/75R16 on sale for 725 installed. lifetime rotation and balancing.  is that a good price?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • I have thought an EV might have some practical value in extending the life of the ICE members of ones fleet. Now....I'm convinced of it. I've been letting my better half access Raven (Mitsubishi Mirage) for her needs while Dizzy has been in the shop. Being the fuel freak I am and given the fact Raven is capable of over 60 mpg in clean air on a warm day I was taken back by the wife's ability to take a car that had used a half a tank of gas that to that point had returned a value of 57 mpg and return in with a decimating 51 mpg for that same tank in that same day in a 15 mile round trip of short hop errands and a stop in the drive through at Micky D's.  😱   Trust me on this. It would take the remainder of that tank driven on the highway to return that tank to just 54 mpg. This is not a Mitsubishi issue. This is an ICE issue that is magnified in vehicles capable of such high fuel economy values. On a percentage basis your 1500 does the same thing. Short hopping an ICE consumes a good deal more fuel and in doing so provides zero additional useable outputs. That entire volume of fuel is wasted in diluting the cylinder walls oil films, creating crankcase moisture and acid content and the resultant wear.    Enter the SLATE. All of that is avoided and the ICE's advantage in range and made useful at reduced wear for your ICE!   Kind'a cool. 
    • Back in the day people would buy cars based on performance. The charger posted does 0-60 in 3.3 seconds. And it’s fully loaded.  It has a decent warranty and will fit most anyone’s needs. Remember the original Hemi? 90 day warranty. 25K mini truck or that car? I’d go with the car. It wouldn’t fit my perimeter. If I could just talk my wife out of her Genesis. It would be perfect for her.
    • Let's pivot this back. Someone said they wanted pictures.   Even better, there's already video. Pre-prod prototypes are already on the road and they're letting the press drive them.   JerryRigEverything did a good review. I really enjoy his content and EV adventures, so I was thrilled when he had the chance to review a Slate:    
    • The Charger EV was stillborn. Wrong car at the wrong price for Dodge's intended audience. Now at a good price with fire-sale discounts, and still not selling, it's still very much the wrong car. Again, Dodge's intended audience. I believe a lot of Stellantis' EV blunders were all under Tavares' regime at Stellantis...the board convinced him to move on. Neat car, just wasn't received on the level that would sustain mass production.   Dodge is headed in a better direction for its core business. I didn't think there was anything left to get excited about re: the Durango after its 15 year run, but they're just now releasing a 392 version that should price out in the low 40's. Nicely done. I'm not sure I would touch anything Stellantis makes with a 10' pole these days, but the Durango is still mostly parts designed like 3 parent companies ago so maybe it's still OK?
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...