Jump to content

Does No Tailgate Save Fuel?


Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm pretty sure you're not going to notice any difference. I've also heard that removing it messes with the aerodynamics of the truck and actually decreases fuel economy. A custom tune (a la Wait4Me or Wheatley or Westers) tuned for fuel economy should net 2-3 mpg increase too.

Posted

With the tailgate up an air bubble is created in the bed causing smooth air flow over the bed. Remove the tailgate and you loose the air bubble creating more drag.

 

Don

Posted
Didn't Mythbusters do something on this a couple of years ago?

 

 

Yes they did, i think leaving the tailgate up and have the next were about equal, a cover and no gate made MPG worse.

Posted

Mythbusters did test this out and did a road test and a water-flow test with a model truck and found that the air pocket in the airbed does allow air to flow over the cab and over the bed and drop behind the truckbed. If you take out the tailgate, the airflow over the cab drops right into the bed and causes more drag. In their show, with two identical trucks and exact driving parametes, fuel, and weight, the truck without the tailgate ran out of fuel I think at least 15 or 30 miles before the one with the tailgate. It was a pretty sweet episode.

Posted

I've done the tailgate up vs down experiment on two different road trips. I reset the avg mpg with it up, drove 50 miles, and made note of the #'s. I pulled off, dropped the tailgate, got back up to speed, reset the computer, drove 50 miles, and compared the #'s. On two different road trips, maintaining the same speed, driving style, terrain, etc., I got 1-1.5 mpg more with the tailgate up than I did with it down.

 

Like someone said, one truck doesn't make for a definitive answer. But, that was my experience with it...

Posted
using your DIC?

 

HAHA! Yeah, using my Driver's Information Center. :nopity:

 

The first trip, I wasn't going to be on the road long enough to run a full tank. The 2nd trip, I was going to be in the mountains by the time I needed a 2nd tank of fuel. So, that's why I did the 50 miles each, on flat ground. I figured the unboard computer, even if it was wrong, would be wrong the same way for both times.

Posted

sorry hate using that acronym sometimes......I guess I should run my own tests.......

Posted

Long term, It looks like I got about .4 mpg increase in mileage after installing my Access cover. At this rate I figure I'll break even on my investment by the year 2035. Using the DIC, I went from 16.1 to 16.5.

 

Looks cool though.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Forum Statistics

    250.6k
    Total Topics
    2.7m
    Total Posts
  • Member Statistics

    343,007
    Total Members
    8,960
    Most Online
    Brendan C
    Newest Member
    Brendan C
    Joined
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 1,274 Guests (See full list)

  • Latest Articles

  • Posts

    • You're better read than that Atlas. 😏   British science fiction writer Arthur C. Clarke formulated three adages that are known as Clarke's three laws, of which the third law – that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic" – is the best known and most widely cited.   Stribeck and the pivotable Hersey Number isn't voodoo nor snake oil. That part is physics. It's what marketing and bean counters do with it that is snake oil and voodoo.    Stribeck is the relationship between Hersey and the Coefficient of Friction. Within the Hersey Equation if viscosity and viscosity is 'Dependent' on.......heat.......and.......viscosity index or the temperature to viscosity slope.    Specifically Hersey is the viscosity AT THE TEMPERATURE IN THAT LOCATION FOR THAT SLOPE.   Hydrodynamic lubrication exist when the film thickness in the location is 3X the Ra roughness of the surface. This is irrespective of the hardness of the substrate. To obtain that thickness X viscosity is required for Y velocity at Z load. That's a lot of moving parts. It is also impossible to maintain in an ICE but nearly possible with a turbine under constant load.    What does that mean? Error heavy and operate light. Wear is inevitable but the rate of wear and the milage obtainable are a function of prevailing conditions and HABITS. The only penalty is viscous drag and at fractions so low as to be well worth the effort. Double the life, half the manufacturing carbon foot print. Greed is the only impediment.    The materials generated by SwRI are the RESULT not an estimation or a hypothesis.    Don't delude yourself sir, EV's have as many pitfalls as ICE's. We just don't know what they are yet and it will take longer to sort as MARKETING and GREEDY CEO's have had more time to polish the turd they are selling. 
    • You can always count on greed to prey on ignorance and stupidity.    Friend bought a 2019 Ford Flex and asked me about using Valvoline R&P 5W30 in it. Told him give the miles on it and the fact it wasn't yet using oil that it was a good plan. He uses a Valvoline quick change shop for his oil service.   First they tell him that isn't the oil the OEM recommends. He told them he didn't care what the OEM thought. Then they floated the, "But it will void your warranty"    His reply was it's a 2019, there is no warranty and informed them their knowledge of the law was lacking.    Then they tell him 'But it will ruin your motor"!.    Mine to ruin he says. Finally they give in and charge him 150% the semi-syn price    Point it the brainwash is so embedded that even the service industry is drunk on their swill. The public is right behind them. Echoing the same lies on every forum and media platform. If the end goal is indeed EV then I'd say that ship is about built. 
    • Diesel hit $6.00 here today at the truck stop.   Payed $2.79 for E85 today too.
    • Thanks for posting, I'm sure it will help someone
  • GM-Trucks.com Clubs

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...